Liberals, what would YOU do?

[Aunt Antifa]

It does not have to be a fact that he was reaching for a weapon, only a reasonable possibility.

But then you knew that. He got exactly what was coming to him, the cereal rapist was put out of his misery.

So a police-tactics-knower now insists cops can murder you dead if they simply think someone might have a weapon. This is how we know *they* would like to be policed in their gun-filled homes and communities. Cops can just shoot if they think you’re gonna go for a weapon.

Just say what you really mean: Black people are disposable and always have it coming.

Also, if Blake was putting his dick in Fruity Pebbles, it’s none of your business.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

 

[Aunt Antifa]

yeah it does if they are walking away to get a weapon.

“HE HAS A GUN” is now “I THINK HE MIGHT AT SOME POINT HAVE A WEAPON OPEN FIRE!”

Well. It is my sincere hope that police use this new training technique *every* time they’re called to a home with a weapon in it, regardless of legality of that weapon.

Shoot, shoot, shoot, shoot, shoot, shoot, shoot.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

 

[Simpletruther]

So a police-tactics-knower now insists cops can murder you dead if they simply think someone might have a weapon. This is how we know *they* would like to be policed in their gun-filled homes and communities. Cops can just shoot if they think you’re gonna go for a weapon.

Just say what you really mean: Black people are disposable and always have it coming.

Also, if Blake was putting his dick in Fruity Pebbles, it’s none of your business.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Nonsense deflection. No,cops can’t just shoot people because they think they might hsve a weapon, there has to a reasonable assumption that they may about be about to go for a weapon and use it. But you know this, you just hate cops and love rapists.

 

[Aunt Antifa]

Nonsense deflection. No,cops can’t just shoot people because they think they might hsve a weapon, there has to a reasonable assumption that they may about be about to go for a weapon and use it. But you know this, you just hate cops and love rapists.

Ohhh...I see: they can’t just shoot you if they think you have a weapon, they also have to think you’re gonna go get it.

Well ****. I wonder what you do as a Black person when the reasonable assumption is you’re about to be murdered.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

 

[Simpletruther]

Ohhh...I see: they can’t just shoot you if they think you have a weapon, they also have to think you’re gonna go get it.
Well ****. I wonder what you do as a Black person when the reasonable assumption is you’re about to be murdered.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

No, more fake deflection. They can’t just think you are about to use it. There has to be a reasonable basis, like for instance you are a piece of Shiite cereal rapist who has just attacked police and ignoring their commands, resisting arrest and reaching into your vehicle.
But again, you knew this, you just hate cops and love savage rapists.

 

[Aunt Antifa]

No, more fake deflection. They can’t just think you are about to use it. There has to be a reasonable basis, like for instance you are a piece of Shiite cereal rapist who has just attacked police and ignoring their commands, resisting arrest and reaching into your vehicle.
But again, you knew this, you just hate cops and love savage rapists.

YEah, the screaming kids were probably what led them to think “He’s going to hurt us, let’s murder him quick.”


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

 

[Casper]

YEah, the screaming kids were probably what led them to think “He’s going to hurt us, let’s murder him quick.”


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Now you got, the Only acceptable answer for the OP is shoot him in the back 7 Times. Thankfully they are not Police Officer, we hope.

 

[Sweden]

You are a cop responding to a violent perp breaking a restraining in order. You know he has violent history and outstanding warrants.

He had physically attacked you, you apply a taser which and he still resists. You and partner draw your weapons and he continues to ignore you and walks to his car.

You are quite aware and have seen in training of dash cam films of fellow cops being killed by perps after “reaching in Their car”.


the perp reaches into the car.

What do you do? It takes about half a second for him to turn and fire. Do you wait and “take your chances” ?

What would you do?

You are also aware of the loss of small motor skills under extreme pressure that nearly everyone suffers (google if you doubt that).

What an unfair question! You must know that the lefties don't do doing, they only do condemning what others do. Where they are in power they take no action at all; firstly because they are incapable of agreeing among themselves and secondly because doing things would reduce the time they have available to steal public funds.

 

[noonereal]

Maybe the cops should've assessed the situation first and de-escalated before immediately trying to arrest Blake.

Resisting arrest is a misdemeanor...and shouldn't be a death sentence no matter how you slice it.

The difference between the way the Kenosha police treated Blake who violated a restraining order....and Rittenhouse who killed two people and wounded another is like night and day.

Why weren't the cops wearing body cams?

This is a classic logical fallacy. The Rittenhouse case has nothing to do with Blake escalating a simple arrest to his detriment.

The cops did the right thing in not waiting to be stabbed by Blake, Rittenhouse on the other hand was a beneficiary of systemic police bias. (I'd put his mom in jail too)

See?

Not all left good, all right bad like a mindless dolt. Each incident needs to be seen for what it is.

Learn to think independent of tribe and you will teach yourself much.

all the best

 

[noonereal]

You have decided for a fact that Blake was reaching for a weapon and deserved to be shot in the back 7 times yet you need a fainting couch because I don’t give a single **** about cops?

It is what it is.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Do you know anyone who ever keep a knife under his feet as he drove?

That is one hell of a coincidence... that after physically resisting arrest he went to his and reached in, exactly where the knife was, with no intent to grab it.

That is an inane hypothesis.

But all this is off point as your statement about police is totally unacceptable.

 

[holbritter]

You are a cop responding to a violent perp breaking a restraining in order. You know he has violent history and outstanding warrants.

He had physically attacked you, you apply a taser which and he still resists. You and partner draw your weapons and he continues to ignore you and walks to his car.

You are quite aware and have seen in training of dash cam films of fellow cops being killed by perps after “reaching in Their car”.


the perp reaches into the car.

What do you do? It takes about half a second for him to turn and fire. Do you wait and “take your chances” ?

What would you do?

You are also aware of the loss of small motor skills under extreme pressure that nearly everyone suffers (google if you doubt that).

Not a liberal, but - I would taser him again and tackle the guy before he got to his car door to open it.
I'm on both sides with this one. They both bear responsibility on what happened.

 

[Citizen]

You are a cop responding to a violent perp breaking a restraining in order. You know he has violent history and outstanding warrants.

He had physically attacked you, you apply a taser which and he still resists. You and partner draw your weapons and he continues to ignore you and walks to his car.

You are quite aware and have seen in training of dash cam films of fellow cops being killed by perps after “reaching in Their car”.


the perp reaches into the car.

What do you do? It takes about half a second for him to turn and fire. Do you wait and “take your chances” ?

What would you do?

You are also aware of the loss of small motor skills under extreme pressure that nearly everyone suffers (google if you doubt that).

Well, I know who he is and know where he lives. Pick him up later. He is not going anywhere. Probably going to take his kids home. Let him calm down. Just like you would do for the average white guy

 

[Aunt Antifa]

Do you know anyone who ever keep a knife under his feet as he drove?

That is one hell of a coincidence... that after physically resisting arrest he went to his and reached in, exactly where the knife was, with no intent to grab it.

That is an inane hypothesis.

But all this is off point as your statement about police is totally unacceptable.

If Blake were white, with a gun rack, and screaming kids, cops wouldn’t have shot him 7 times in his back.

“He had a knife,” “He had a gun,” “He was Black in the wrong neighborhood”...we’ve all heard every cop excuse for a “good shoot” that angry white doods use as a fig leaf to edge themselves to this garbage.

We disagree that this was a coincidence.

I missed the memo where I needed your acceptance of any statements I make. Whoops.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

 

[holbritter]

Not let him just walk away to his car, grab him by more than his t-shirt and put him on the ground and in handcuffs. Happens all the time.

Yup. The cop would get ripped up in the press for that too, but at least no one would have been shot.

 

[holbritter]

Well, I know who he is and know where he lives. Pick him up later. He is not going anywhere. Probably going to take his kids home. Let him calm down. Just like you would do for the average white guy

They WOULD NOT do that for anyone...white or not. That's just a bull**** statement.

 

[Citizen]

They WOULD NOT do that for anyone...white or not. That's just a bull**** statement.

LOL. OK. If you say so

 

[holbritter]

LOL. OK. If you say so

I do. This isn't Mayberry and it's not the 1950's.

 

[Simpletruther]

Well, I know who he is and know where he lives. Pick him up later. He is not going anywhere. Probably going to take his kids home. Let him calm down. Just like you would do for the average white guy

Nope, we don’t just “not arrest” people because they decide they don’t want to go. That’s insane.

Why should he act any different later, if his assaulting police and resisting worked the first time? It’s like paying ransom to terrorists, it just means more terrorists are not coming.

Hey we have bank robbers resisting arrest, somebody might get hurt, let’s just let them go and hope to find the, later. It doesn’t work that way. Nor are police trained to do that. The man raped his wife on a regular basis according to her statement. We don’t just let people like that go with kids. He is dangerous.

 

[Simpletruther]

Not a liberal, but - I would taser him again and tackle the guy before he got to his car door to open it.
I'm on both sides with this one. They both bear responsibility on what happened.

Some reports say he had s knife in his hand. Some of those tasers are one shot deals. What if you can’t taser and he is armed?
You don’t tackle perps in that scenario.

 

[Simpletruther]

YEah, the screaming kids were probably what led them to think “He’s going to hurt us, let’s murder him quick.”


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

No, it was the things I Just mentioned that gave them the obvious reasonable fear of it. The piece of Shiite probably beat those kids just like he routinely rape his wife according to her own statement. They should thank the cops.
The best thing that savage ever did was go for a gun in the car, so that society can rid themselves of him. It’s all on him.
Again, I get that since you hate cops and love rapists you are angry, but it doesn’t change the facts.

 

[HennyBogan]

Uh, I dunno back off and call for a social worker to defuse the situation?

How far can you back off in 1 second?

 

[HennyBogan]

Don't know but I wouldn't have put 7 bullets into him.

One shoulda been enough

 

[Aunt Antifa]

No, it was the things I Just mentioned that gave them the obvious reasonable fear of it.

Yes, their fear was obvious, I just don’t agree that it was reasonable.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

 

[Simpletruther]

If they did, it wasn't captured on video and the dispatch audio shows the entire encounter from the time the cops arrived to the time they shot Blake in the back was less than three minutes. So that didn't leave much time for assessing or de-escalating the situation before jumping in to make an arrest, did it?


If you're referring to the knife: Fact check: Jacob Blake didn't 'brandish' knife in Kenosha shooting

There's no evidence that the cops lives were in danger or threatened...so they would be hard pressed to claim self defense...especially after following him and then shooting him the back in front of his kids and finding no weapons in the car other than a knife on the passenger side floor. What kind of knife, the police didn't say...nor could they say if the knife was on him during the encounter or whether he was reaching for it when he was shot.

By all accounts it looks like the cops escalated the situation and then shot him in the back after he didn't comply to their demands to stop.

Yes, in fact there was plenty of evidence their lives were potentially in danger. A violent resisting perp (and serial rapist) is ignoring orders even in the face of deadly weapons trained on him. That alone show a dangerous unhinged mindset. Combined with going into a car reaching for something, poses a potential life ending scenario for the cop. You don’t think these cops have seen dash cam footage of other cops dying exactly like this, with perp reaching into a car? This is all on the unhinged perp.

 

[Simpletruther]

Yes, their fear was obvious, I just don’t agree that it was reasonable.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Yea because you hate cops and love rapists. Go look st the footage of other cops dying exactly the same way, when a violent perp reaches into his car and gets a surprise out for the cops.

It’s utter nonsense to say that isn’t a reasonable fear given a perp is ignoring your orders in the face of weapons drawn on him, that is the defintion of an unhinged person that does that.