• Please read the Announcement concerning missing posts from 10/8/25-10/15/25.
  • This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

LGBT adoption and parenting

Maybe I'm a bit burned out.

Take a vacation (voluntary).. turn off the phone, computer, etc etc etc, and go visit nice beaches, that and drink strange concoctions that have tiny plastic umbrellas in them. (but don't let your wife see you checking out the babes in thong bikini's)
 
Dude, it's LGBTQS. You left off the 'S'. The 'S' is for STUPID, so we can include the rest the Democratic Party who don't fit the other 5 letters.

Mexico pay for that wall yet?

I'd probably refrain from calling other people "STUPID," if my team was dumb enough to buy that one :roll:
 
Mexico pay for that wall yet?

I'd probably refrain from calling other people "STUPID," if my team was dumb enough to buy that one :roll:

You bought Obamacare, the dumbest healthcare plan ever devised. Where's that $2500 savings every family was going to get?

waiting-on-our-2500-obamacare-savings-25633876.png
 
We already know what love is, pal. I think you are the one that needs to get a clue.

You know the love between 2 men or 2 women (I don't mind), but this one is real love!
 
Dude, it's LGBTQS. You left off the 'S'. The 'S' is for STUPID, so we can include the rest the Democratic Party who don't fit the other 5 letters.

That is possibly the most revealing post I've seen from you in some time. It says everything I need to know about you and your anti-LGBTQ attitude.
 
You know the love between 2 men or 2 women (I don't mind), but this one is real love!

And how is what either Clax or the governness has not real love?
 
You are still projecting. There is nothing to show that either man believes they are or desires to be a woman. And given the number of stay home dad's with working mom's we have nowadays, in those households that that can afford to not have both parents working, you are most likely also projecting artificial gender roles on what is "being a woman".

And this is before we note that you are doing the same that every anti SSM, anti gay adoption poster does. You only concentrate on male gay couples. You guys never make points dealing with gay women, until those of us on the pro side bring it up. Which is very telling, and simply confirms that you are projecting your ick factor into the issue.

Sent from my Z982 using Tapatalk

I am not talking about the artificial side effect, rather than the biological. What concerns gay couple, I actually prefer gay women than men. I rather a child grow in hands of a mother than someone that thinks he's a she.
 
Here in the States, we have a lot of bad "kids."

Just read today about a "kid" in New York City who ran up to a middle-aged man and hit him in the head.

I would much prefer that children have two GOOD gay parents than two BAD "normal" parents.

And so would anyone who has been the victim of violence by a "kid" who had "normal" parents or -- more probably -- only a mother to raise the bad actor.
 
I am not talking about the artificial side effect, rather than the biological. What concerns gay couple, I actually prefer gay women than men. I rather a child grow in hands of a mother than someone that thinks he's a she.

That's not exactly supported by evidence.
 
That's not exactly supported by evidence.

What you are saying is not supported neither. and if it is, probably they are gay or simply support the LGBT community
 
1.) In some places same-Sex Couples Are Being Turned Away From Becoming Adoptive Parents.
2.) Why should we allow same-sex couple to adopt?
3.) Don't they ruin the child psychologically by teaching the wrong things and going against mother nature?
4.) The entire nature is getting destroyed by adopting kids and showing that its OK, to not have a dad and a mother.
5.) The society must grow their population and by exposing kids to couples of same sex, we are destroying their mental life and avoiding the growth of the society.[/B]

Every so often these threads come up and every time the same results . . . they go down in flames lol because theres no facts to support their bigotry.

1.) places that dont have rights and freedoms
2.) same reason we allow ANYBODY that qualifies to adopt, children need a loving caring home
3.) no
4.) no facts make that true
5.) no facts make that true
 
I am not talking about the artificial side effect, rather than the biological. What concerns gay couple, I actually prefer gay women than men. I rather a child grow in hands of a mother than someone that thinks he's a she.
You keep making this claim, but you are.not showing any support of gay men, or at least half of those getting married, think they are women. Gays, not transgenders. You are either conflating the two, or projecting your own beliefs on what gays are like.

Let me guess. If the father is a stay at home dad, and the mother is the breadwinner, then she thinks she's a he, and he thinks he's a she, right?

Sent from my Z982 using Tapatalk
 
Who is Clax and governess?
Not following the thread? They have mentioned their same sex mates several times.

Sent from my Z982 using Tapatalk
 
What you are saying is not supported neither. and if it is, probably they are gay or simply support the LGBT community

Not neither means is. Thanks for agreeing and admitting you are wrong.
 
How many homicidal, disturbed, serial killers were adopted by gay parents?


Zero.
 
Back
Top Bottom