Navy Pride
DP Veteran
- Joined
- Jul 11, 2005
- Messages
- 39,883
- Reaction score
- 3,070
- Location
- Pacific NW
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Very Conservative
Deegan said:Jeez, you can't trust these animals with your children, your wives, or your money, Washington sucks!:roll:
aps said:Deeg, baby, this involves a state senator. So he's not a "Washington" politico.
Not yet, but you can bet he wants to be.aps said:Deeg, baby, this involves a state senator. So he's not a "Washington" politico.
Deegan said:Oh, well same difference, sometimes the state politicians are worse, they are not under a national spotlight, they all suck!
Where's the hypocrisy? 18 yearold and 16 year old are very very different for one - legality. And finally he's condemned for doing so as well. The only hypocrisy thus far is your continued call for responsibilities and honesty while you do not condemn racism, pedophillia and corruption of any one who's a republican.Navy Pride said:Soth Dakota State Democratic Senator accused of wrongdoing with and 18 year old page..........The hypocrisy of the left strikes again......:
jfuh said:Where's the hypocrisy? 18 yearold and 16 year old are very very different for one - legality. And finally he's condemned for doing so as well. The only hypocrisy thus far is your continued call for responsibilities and honesty while you do not condemn racism, pedophillia and corruption of any one who's a republican.
Captain America said:Is this the part where the democrats should start pointing fingers in other directions like the republicans did when their guy(s) were in trouble? :rofl
Let's see how it breaks.
So far, we have a Senator, makin' whoopie with a 18 year old woman?
Hang 'em high I say! No self respecting politician should be having sex with an adult of the opposite gender! That's not the American way!!
To the gallows!!:rofl
Whoa! Stop the presses. The 18 year old was a MALE!! Having sex with an adult of the same gender.....now THAT'S more like it. For a minute there, I was beginning to worry....
Bailiff....whack his pee-pee!
So quickly the strawman. Sex with someone who's 16 aka jailbait, is far from sex with anyone having sex with someone who is 18 - legal adult capable of conscent as per said by the law. And so soon you bring in clinton, why am I no at all surprised?Navy Pride said:He is still a page........Senators are not suppose to be sexually involved with pages unless they are named "Slick Willie" Clinton and an intern...........Would you like your 18 year old involved with a senator........
I'm not defending him. Try reading NP. I've defended no one here; not as you have defended a pedophile.Navy Pride said:Why did I know you woule defend this scumbag?:roll:
Captain America said:...Bailiff....whack his pee-pee!
Navy Pride said:Soth Dakota State Democratic Senator accused of wrongdoing with and 18 year old page..........The hypocrisy of the left strikes again......
Paladin said:I don't have anything to contribute to this thread, but gawd, I do love my vintage Cheech and Chong!! :rofl
"Dave's not here, man!"
ted
star2589 said:why must this be a partisan issue?
Who made it such? the hypocrisy of your republican party. Calling for traditional values, responsibilities, transparency, good christian morals. Yet then Foley himself a pedophille and he blames it all on alcoholism? The only hypocrisy is the GOP's own hypocrisy, oh as well as that of pedophillic apologetics.Navy Pride said:I don't know.........Why must the Foley scandel be a partisan issue..you tell me.......
Navy Pride said:I don't know.........Why must the Foley scandel be a partisan issue..you tell me.......
jfuh said:So quickly the strawman. Sex with someone who's 16 aka jailbait, is far from sex with anyone having sex with someone who is 18 - legal adult capable of conscent as per said by the law. And so soon you bring in clinton, why am I no at all surprised?
I'm not defending him. Try reading NP. I've defended no one here; not as you have defended a pedophile.
http://www.debatepolitics.com/break...it-messages-minors-2.html?posted=1#post398311
Well that's stupid, actually no I did not know that the age of consent in DC is 16. How the **** can a 16 year old adolescent give consent? Stupid.RightatNYU said:jfuh-
You do know that the age of consent in DC is 16, right? Foley committed no crime, just like this guy didn't. They both acted inappopriately, and as such, should resign, but neither one broke the law.
jfuh said:Who made it such? the hypocrisy of your republican party. Calling for traditional values, responsibilities, transparency, good christian morals. Yet then Foley himself a pedophille and he blames it all on alcoholism? The only hypocrisy is the GOP's own hypocrisy, oh as well as that of pedophillic apologetics.
star2589 said:I dont think it should be either.
So where's Hasterts head? Whom specifically are calling for his head?Navy Pride said:Yeah Republicans are the ones calling for Hastert head:roll: Get a frigging clue will ya........
jfuh said:Well that's stupid, actually no I did not know that the age of consent in DC is 16. How the **** can a 16 year old adolescent give consent? Stupid.
RightatNYU said:The same way that 36 other states declare the age of consent to be 16 or younger. If you have a problem with this law specific to DC, blame the overwhelmingly Democratic legislature.
So, now that you're aware that Foley broke no law in his actions, I'm assuming you'll drop your line of attack claiming that there's a difference between the situations and instead agree that in both cases, the persons involved should have resigned simply because their actions broke ethical codes.
I drop that there were any legal variances in the two. However I do not drop that there still remains a difference between the two 16 and 18 are still quite varied.RightatNYU said:The same way that 36 other states declare the age of consent to be 16 or younger. If you have a problem with this law specific to DC, blame the overwhelmingly Democratic legislature.
So, now that you're aware that Foley broke no law in his actions, I'm assuming you'll drop your line of attack claiming that there's a difference between the situations and instead agree that in both cases, the persons involved should have resigned simply because their actions broke ethical codes.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?