Legislative Scandal Story Breaking (1 Viewer)

[Navy Pride]

Soth Dakota State Democratic Senator accused of wrongdoing with and 18 year old page..........The hypocrisy of the left strikes again......:

http://southdakotapolitics.blogs.com/

18 October 2006

The South Dakota Attorney General's Office and Senate leaders are investigating allegations of wrongdoing involving a state lawmaker and an 18-year-old legislative page, officials confirmed Tuesday.

The father of a former page has accused Sen. Dan Sutton, D-Flandreau, of misconduct during the last legislative session, according to state Sen. Garry Moore.

 

[Deegan]

Jeez, you can't trust these animals with your children, your wives, or your money, Washington sucks!:roll:

 

[aps]

Jeez, you can't trust these animals with your children, your wives, or your money, Washington sucks!:roll:

Deeg, baby, this involves a state senator. So he's not a "Washington" politico.

 

[Deegan]

Deeg, baby, this involves a state senator. So he's not a "Washington" politico.

Oh, well same difference, sometimes the state politicians are worse, they are not under a national spotlight, they all suck!

 

[Diogenes]

Deeg, baby, this involves a state senator. So he's not a "Washington" politico.

Not yet, but you can bet he wants to be.

 

[aps]

Oh, well same difference, sometimes the state politicians are worse, they are not under a national spotlight, they all suck!

LOL Yes, sometimes they do.

 

[jfuh]

Soth Dakota State Democratic Senator accused of wrongdoing with and 18 year old page..........The hypocrisy of the left strikes again......:

Where's the hypocrisy? 18 yearold and 16 year old are very very different for one - legality. And finally he's condemned for doing so as well. The only hypocrisy thus far is your continued call for responsibilities and honesty while you do not condemn racism, pedophillia and corruption of any one who's a republican.

 

[Captain America]

Is this the part where the democrats should start pointing fingers in other directions like the republicans did when their guy(s) were in trouble? :rofl

Let's see how it breaks.

So far, we have a Senator, makin' whoopie with a 18 year old woman?

Hang 'em high I say! No self respecting politician should be having sex with an adult of the opposite gender! That's not the American way!!

To the gallows!!:rofl


Whoa! Stop the presses. The 18 year old was a MALE!! Having sex with an adult of the same gender.....now THAT'S more like it. For a minute there, I was beginning to worry....

Bailiff....whack his pee-pee!

 

[Navy Pride]

Where's the hypocrisy? 18 yearold and 16 year old are very very different for one - legality. And finally he's condemned for doing so as well. The only hypocrisy thus far is your continued call for responsibilities and honesty while you do not condemn racism, pedophillia and corruption of any one who's a republican.

He is still a page........Senators are not suppose to be sexually involved with pages unless they are named "Slick Willie" Clinton and an intern...........Would you like your 18 year old involved with a senator........This scumbag is 36 years old.

http://www.vote-smart.org/bio.php?can_id=BS034876

Why did I know you woule defend this scumbag?:roll:

 

[Navy Pride]

Is this the part where the democrats should start pointing fingers in other directions like the republicans did when their guy(s) were in trouble? :rofl

Let's see how it breaks.

So far, we have a Senator, makin' whoopie with a 18 year old woman?

Hang 'em high I say! No self respecting politician should be having sex with an adult of the opposite gender! That's not the American way!!

To the gallows!!:rofl


Whoa! Stop the presses. The 18 year old was a MALE!! Having sex with an adult of the same gender.....now THAT'S more like it. For a minute there, I was beginning to worry....

Bailiff....whack his pee-pee!

Why am I not surprised that you of all people would take that tact.....:rofl

 

[jfuh]

He is still a page........Senators are not suppose to be sexually involved with pages unless they are named "Slick Willie" Clinton and an intern...........Would you like your 18 year old involved with a senator........

So quickly the strawman. Sex with someone who's 16 aka jailbait, is far from sex with anyone having sex with someone who is 18 - legal adult capable of conscent as per said by the law. And so soon you bring in clinton, why am I no at all surprised?

Why did I know you woule defend this scumbag?:roll:

I'm not defending him. Try reading NP. I've defended no one here; not as you have defended a pedophile.

http://www.debatepolitics.com/break...it-messages-minors-2.html?posted=1#post398311

 

[Paladin]

...Bailiff....whack his pee-pee!

I don't have anything to contribute to this thread, but gawd, I do love my vintage Cheech and Chong!! :rofl
"Dave's not here, man!"
ted

 

[FallingPianos]

Soth Dakota State Democratic Senator accused of wrongdoing with and 18 year old page..........The hypocrisy of the left strikes again......

why must this be a partisan issue?

 

[Deegan]

I don't have anything to contribute to this thread, but gawd, I do love my vintage Cheech and Chong!! :rofl
"Dave's not here, man!"
ted

I thought that was from that old Dan Ackroyd movie!

 

[Navy Pride]

why must this be a partisan issue?

I don't know.........Why must the Foley scandel be a partisan issue..you tell me.......

 

[jfuh]

I don't know.........Why must the Foley scandel be a partisan issue..you tell me.......

Who made it such? the hypocrisy of your republican party. Calling for traditional values, responsibilities, transparency, good christian morals. Yet then Foley himself a pedophille and he blames it all on alcoholism? The only hypocrisy is the GOP's own hypocrisy, oh as well as that of pedophillic apologetics.

 

[FallingPianos]

I don't know.........Why must the Foley scandel be a partisan issue..you tell me.......

I dont think it should be either.

 

[RightinNYC]

So quickly the strawman. Sex with someone who's 16 aka jailbait, is far from sex with anyone having sex with someone who is 18 - legal adult capable of conscent as per said by the law. And so soon you bring in clinton, why am I no at all surprised?

I'm not defending him. Try reading NP. I've defended no one here; not as you have defended a pedophile.

http://www.debatepolitics.com/break...it-messages-minors-2.html?posted=1#post398311

jfuh-

You do know that the age of consent in DC is 16, right? Foley committed no crime, just like this guy didn't. They both acted inappopriately, and as such, should resign, but neither one broke the law.

 

[jfuh]

jfuh-

You do know that the age of consent in DC is 16, right? Foley committed no crime, just like this guy didn't. They both acted inappopriately, and as such, should resign, but neither one broke the law.

Well that's stupid, actually no I did not know that the age of consent in DC is 16. How the **** can a 16 year old adolescent give consent? Stupid.

 

[Navy Pride]

Who made it such? the hypocrisy of your republican party. Calling for traditional values, responsibilities, transparency, good christian morals. Yet then Foley himself a pedophille and he blames it all on alcoholism? The only hypocrisy is the GOP's own hypocrisy, oh as well as that of pedophillic apologetics.

Yeah Republicans are the ones calling for Hastert head:roll: Get a frigging clue will ya........

 

[Navy Pride]

I dont think it should be either.

Well the democrats saw blood in the water and jumped all over it.......

 

[jfuh]

Yeah Republicans are the ones calling for Hastert head:roll: Get a frigging clue will ya........

So where's Hasterts head? Whom specifically are calling for his head?

 

[RightinNYC]

Well that's stupid, actually no I did not know that the age of consent in DC is 16. How the **** can a 16 year old adolescent give consent? Stupid.

The same way that 36 other states declare the age of consent to be 16 or younger. If you have a problem with this law specific to DC, blame the overwhelmingly Democratic legislature.

So, now that you're aware that Foley broke no law in his actions, I'm assuming you'll drop your line of attack claiming that there's a difference between the situations and instead agree that in both cases, the persons involved should have resigned simply because their actions broke ethical codes.

 

[Deegan]

The same way that 36 other states declare the age of consent to be 16 or younger. If you have a problem with this law specific to DC, blame the overwhelmingly Democratic legislature.

So, now that you're aware that Foley broke no law in his actions, I'm assuming you'll drop your line of attack claiming that there's a difference between the situations and instead agree that in both cases, the persons involved should have resigned simply because their actions broke ethical codes.

:rofl

Could not have said it any better. You would think a guy with 90 grand in his freezer would step down as well.:roll:

 

[jfuh]

The same way that 36 other states declare the age of consent to be 16 or younger. If you have a problem with this law specific to DC, blame the overwhelmingly Democratic legislature.

So, now that you're aware that Foley broke no law in his actions, I'm assuming you'll drop your line of attack claiming that there's a difference between the situations and instead agree that in both cases, the persons involved should have resigned simply because their actions broke ethical codes.

I drop that there were any legal variances in the two. However I do not drop that there still remains a difference between the two 16 and 18 are still quite varied.
Also, how does democratic legislature have anything to do with it? California, NY both democratic heavy states, both require consenting age to be 18. That argument is neither here nor there in any validity.