• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Leftist thinking at its best

Guilty

I wouldn't actually want a nuclear weapon though. If I had the money, I wouldn't mind a F-35, or LAV, or an EFV. Maybe an attack helicopter.

I would literally sell parts of my body to own an F-22, but I think it is a good thing that buying one is illegal.
 
I would literally sell parts of my body to own an F-22, but I think it is a good thing that buying one is illegal.

I would sell your body parts for an F-18. Since I worked on them in the navy, I actually know how they(used to) work.
 
I would sell your body parts for an F-18. Since I worked on them in the navy, I actually know how they(used to) work.

Actually my body parts wouldn't get you enough for a happy meal. :(
 
Deuce, I wouldn't blame you...and I don't necessarily disagree.

Redress, I thought pilots love the F-14 and F-15, or are you speaking solely in terms of your mechanical inclinations and interest?
 
Reddress what with the "very conservative" leaning, or did you trade with someone? :confused:
------------------------------
That is typical of someone trying to smear the left its a conman tactic among broadcasts like these. I laugh with they use it on the right as well...
 
Yes, that is the view that normal people take.

Crazy people think "arms" refers to anything that is a weapon, including a nuke.

its normally anti gun types who claim that the NRA or the GOA think people can own nukes.

citizens were expected to be able to appear at the muster with standard infantry arms-not ride up with a team of horses towing heavy artillery or sailing up in a 40 gun Man O' War.

the FDR administration used a tortured expansion of the commerce clause to tax the ownership of submachine guns in an idiotic effort to stop prohibition era gangsters. I would concede the use of a nuclear weapon would clearly affect interstate commerce. possessing an UZI does not

I also note that if civilian law enforcement agencies use "assault rifles" and submachine guns (they do) the governmental entity that supplies such weapons is estopped from saying such weapons are too dangerous for other civilians to even own
 
Reddress what with the "very conservative" leaning, or did you trade with someone? :confused:
------------------------------
That is typical of someone trying to smear the left its a conman tactic among broadcasts like these. I laugh with they use it on the right as well...

you really aren't very observant-Redress recently changed to very conservative while the posts continue to be rather liberal. ANother poster now says very liberal after being "slightly right" and actually is posting like a barking moonbat-claiming a Constantine like conversion.
 
you really aren't very observant-Redress recently changed to very conservative while the posts continue to be rather liberal. ANother poster now says very liberal after being "slightly right" and actually is posting like a barking moonbat-claiming a Constantine like conversion.

You, sir, are fairly observant. I understand my conversion, but I am puzzles at the other.
 
You, sir, are fairly observant. I understand my conversion, but I am puzzles at the other.

your posting tenor has not changed-just the slogan under your handle

the other poster went from HOward Baker republican to barking loon liberal in less than two days
 
your posting tenor has not changed-just the slogan under your handle

the other poster went from HOward Baker republican to barking loon liberal in less than two days

You, sir, are completely lacking a sense of humor.

You would not know satire from a flat tire.
 
That was so obviously a plant. A real person that stupid would not be able to use a phone.
 
You, sir, are completely lacking a sense of humor.

You would not know satire from a flat tire.

you sir are silly. I know exactly what is going on. Just because your sense of humor is different from mine, show some tolerance. I thought you libs were open minded
 
Last edited:
you sir are silly. I know exactly what is going on. Just because your sense of humor is different from mine, show some tolerance. I thought you libs were open minded

Oh, are we going to play "Polly wanna cracker"?
 
its normally anti gun types who claim that the NRA or the GOA think people can own nukes.

No, the NRA most definitely does not hold such a view. But some far-right wingers do. And as I said, I do not consider those people to be representative of conservatives as a whole because those people are crazy.
 
Back
Top Bottom