Quit dancing around and admit it.
Keep repeating yourself, maybe it'll make up for the fact that you were incapable of understanding the sentence.
There we go again, Apoc. Doing what your self righteous self does best. Put words into other peoples mouth. I never said propaganda, and never implied it.
So you do wanna play PC, alright. FYI you didn't say the word "unreliable" as well, even though two posts ago you said that this is what you've said, so basically you've lied, aye?
YNET has a habit of linking everything to terrorist organzations
Prove it.
hence was not surprised this accusation came from them.
And since the basis-argument is wrong, this supportive argument supports a false statement and is hence false as well.
Actually, in the case of the IHH, your quiet right.
You were saying that it was this newspaper that has linked the IHH to terrorist organizations.
You've therefore lost every credibility and are making false statements with the intent of discrediting the newspaper.
You claim my attempts to "discredit" this newspaper is quiet amusing. You yourself have admitted this link is based on nothing but wild conspiracy theories.
Never have I admitted such things. I've said the opposite, the link is based on details that are given to the readers. They are able to make their own minds since the details are there, and the details are very convincing.
I have, it just didnt suit you hence why you never heard.
Bull****, you've said "Considering the source you linked, no. It was an expected conclusion.", that was your entire post, no supportive arguments."
Again, denying the obvious is only playing against you.
Read the article. Tell me the sources they listed and the evidence they used to conclude it is linked with a terror organization. And then come back to me. Apparently, they used one letter expressing gratitude to Hasan Nasrallah for his support of their business as "evidence". How pathetic you should fool yourself into believe everything YNET says.
The only one who's fooling himself here is you.
If YNET has an agenda it's an anti-government agenda. It's a center-left newspaper. Even then, YNET has 100% credibility, never in its past did it actually give false information.
Now besides that, they have given the letter, the posts in the blog, and the wife of the Lebanese military officer that was involved in Hariri's murder.
So your saying YNET has had no bias in its past?
No, I'm not saying that - facts say that, and you simply decide you go against the facts and against reality without even giving a convincing argument. It's pathetic.
You're simply claiming that "it's a biased newspaper" because it's Israeli, nothing more and nothing less, and that is a very bigoted and disgusting attitude.
Or because no such terror links exist that the BBC (for example) can formally call valid accusations, with exception to the IHH obviously.
No, there's no "because" there, the BBC didn't even cover it and I fail to see its interest to cover it, a bit less than I fail in seeing your point here though.
Does it? Or does it mean he is thankful for Nasrallah's gratitude towards his business and everything he has sacrificed?
It obviously and undoubtedly means he has supportive opinions of Nasrallah, I don't see a room for an argument here.
You're saying that a person who thanks Nasrallah for supporting his business and says in his blog that Arab countries should be more supportive of Nasrallah and his organization has no supportive opinons of Nasrallah, and that's just ridiculously false.
I have read the article. Stop using childish bait.
Your claim that the letter was the only evidence being presented has exposed the fact that you didn't read the article, and that Kaya is a game over.
And thanks for putting your ego aside and admitting the established link was based on nothing but BS
Never done that, that is an equally infantile and desperate attempt as the "just admit it" rant.