• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

kkk Members in Kentucky Pull Gun on LGBTQ+ Activists — Police Let Them Go

I don't think patting a gun hidden under clothing as pulling a gun. A gross overstatement by anyone, including the media reporting on it.
They did pull a gun.
 
Looks to me that IF the one guy pulled a gun that was against the law and the police consequently diffused the situation by removing their guns.
The articles I've read say the protestors did not lawfully have a permit to protest. They'll need one for the next protest.
My own observation was that the alleged KKK guy should not have pulled the gun.

I don't see where anyone's civil rights were violated though.
The police allowed a KKK member who made threats against LGBT people go.

They let the criminal go. You admit as much.
 
The police allowed a KKK member who made threats against LGBT people go.

They let the criminal go. You admit as much.

I admit to the known facts as I read them. I have read that this case has been referred to the FBI though.
I cannot speak as to why the local police let the man go. Can you?
 
Pride before destruction

===

Proverbs 16:18 - Pride goes before destruction, a haughty spirit before a fall.
 
I admit to the known facts as I read them. I have read that this case has been referred to the FBI though.
I cannot speak as to why the local police let the man go. Can you?
A wise poet once spoke on this subject:

Some of those who work forces
are the same that burn crosses.
 
By the same who think silence is violence.
By the same who believe voicing political opinions and political positions differing form their is violence and hate speech which the government should have those people arrested.
 
A wise poet once spoke on this subject:

Some of those who work forces
are the same that burn crosses.

What concrete proof do you have that demonstrates the above in this case?

A wise poet once spoke on this subject.
Don't judge the entire book by its cover.
 
Aside from the police letting them walk away from a brandishing charge? Other than that, you mean?
I especially like this ad hoc nugget:

"Pointing a gun isn't violence!"

Every one of these people would shit their pants immediately, if somene pointed a gun at them. Some would pull out their gun and shoot and be proud of it. Just ask them.

They definitely know that it is violence.

But when they hop in from the high dive to defend the Klan, they end up saying some pretty stupid things they don't even believe.
 
Aside from the police letting them walk away from a brandishing charge? Other than that, you mean?
Not other than that. I'm not sure why LE did not pursue with a brandishing charge.
The case was referred to the FBI though.
 
I especially like this ad hoc nugget:

"Pointing a gun isn't violence!"

Every one of these people would shit their pants immediately, if somene pointed a gun at them. Some would pull out their gun and shoot and be proud of it. Just ask them.

They definitely know that it is violence.

But when they hop in from the high dive to defend the Klan, they end up saying some pretty stupid things they don't even believe.

LOL, "everyone of these people"
Name them or retract.

I would shit my pants so you got one who would.
Some would be proud and pull out their gun and shoot? Who wrote that on this thread or are you making it up again?

Nobody on this thread has defended the Klan. No one.
 
People can read the thread for themselves, Officer Friendly.And they can loonaround for themselves. I will say that statement includes you, insomuch as the pants-shitting is concerned.

So, you have nothing to prove your allegations above. I accept your concession.
 
Back
Top Bottom