- Joined
- Apr 25, 2010
- Messages
- 80,422
- Reaction score
- 29,077
- Location
- Pittsburgh
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Independent
so Ill write you down as a no, you cant LMAOCan you tell us what the price of gas will factually be in a week?
Two weeks?
Three months?
Since you are asking others to make random predictions…
Can you tell us what the price of gas will factually be in a week?
Two weeks?
Three months?
Since you are asking others to make random predictions…
Purposefully so.You didn't address the OP's points.
Cause you cant LOLPurposefully so.
Not can you predict what prices will be a week, month or three months from now.Cause you cant LOL
at least not with anything that matters and supports the failed claims of the XL being a fix
How so?Not can you predict what prices will be a week, month or three months from now.
Could the pipeline expansion have helped? Potentially.
We will never know because it was stopped.
This is the situation we are in. I don’t see what mocking others does to change it.
Purposefully so.
Not can you predict what prices will be a week, month or three months from now.
Could the pipeline expansion have helped? Potentially.
We will never know because it was stopped.
This is the situation we are in. I don’t see what mocking others does to change it.
Thanks for proving my point again!!Not can you predict what prices will be a week, month or three months from now.
Could the pipeline expansion have helped? Potentially.
We will never know because it was stopped.
This is the situation we are in. I don’t see what mocking others does to change it.
The Keystone XL was going to be a branch of the Keystone Pipeline that currently exists pictured below which is a Canadian pipeline owned by TC Energy that carries Canadian tar sand oil for Asian markets but was never built.
Silly kids, facts are not for right wingersThe Keystone XL was going to be a branch of the Keystone Pipeline that currently exists pictured below which is a Canadian pipeline owned by TC Energy that carries Canadian tar sand oil for Asian markets but was never built. It had many issues being built fo over 10 years due to environmental concerns and eminent domain issues.
View attachment 67380265
For those of you claiming that this would have magically helped the situation we are in now and we wouldn't be in it if it was built can you tell us what the average "gas" prices would factually be
in us (currently around 4.25)?
in the world (currently about 4.90)?
if it was built.
*if the word "factually" by all means guesstimate and support your guess with something intellectual, economically sound nad how the XL would fix the situation
thanks!
oh yeah and for those that just think the pipeline was just "shut off" and needs to be turned back on, i wouldn't even post if i was you LOL
The Keystone XL was going to be a branch of the Keystone Pipeline that currently exists pictured below which is a Canadian pipeline owned by TC Energy that carries Canadian tar sand oil for Asian markets but was never built. It had many issues being built fo over 10 years due to environmental concerns and eminent domain issues.
View attachment 67380265
For those of you claiming that this would have magically helped the situation we are in now and we wouldn't be in it if it was built can you tell us what the average "gas" prices would factually be
in us (currently around 4.25)?
in the world (currently about 4.90)?
if it was built.
*if the word "factually" by all means guesstimate and support your guess with something intellectual, economically sound nad how the XL would fix the situation
thanks!
oh yeah and for those that just think the pipeline was just "shut off" and needs to be turned back on, i wouldn't even post if i was you LOL
no a more likely comparison would be how would flights to Hawaii help with traffic in PittsburghWhy did we need an interstate highway system when we already had loads of other roads?
If you think i did that (which i factually did not) then by all means actually answer my question, have at it tell us how a complete Xl expanding tar sands capacity would have fixed the country's and worlds issue . . .thanksYou seem to ignore the entire purpose of the XL pipeline - which was to expand capacity.
there are right wingers here that understand the facts in the OPSilly kids, facts are not for right wingers
they don't give a shit about facts and reality, just spouting their talking points and dropping steaming piles of troll shit everywhere. It's proven every single day, they won't refute this, it will be moronic one liners, deflections and repeats of the lies
This is not correct, there is no reason that tar sands oil cannot be made into gasoline.Something that needs to be printed out on slips of paper so they can be stapled to the forehead of anyone who starts blithering on about how Biden and Obama supposedly made gasoline expensive by stopping that stupid waste of a pipeline.
What it carries is not refined into gasoline. It cannot be. It gets turned into industrial lubricant. It could not possibly do what they claim it could.
it can be but its significantly more costly and takes longer and not worth it at allSomething that needs to be printed out on slips of paper so they can be stapled to the forehead of anyone who starts blithering on about how Biden and Obama supposedly made gasoline expensive by stopping that stupid waste of a pipeline.
What it carries is not refined into gasoline. It cannot be. It gets turned into industrial lubricant. It could not possibly do what they claim it could.
Energy Dept. Report Admits Economic Benefits of Keystone XL Pipeline
Biden's Energy Department published a report that showed that revoking the Keystone XL Pipeline permits cost thousands of jobs and billions of dollars.www.breitbart.com
good 'ol Joe
The Keystone XL would have delivered roughly 830,000 barrels of crude oil from Canada to the U.S. through the pipeline. Additionally, a labor agreement signed by four unions with TC Energy in August 2020 promised the project would have created 42,000 American jobs and 2 billion in total wages.
Energy’s report indicated the Keystone XL project would have created between 16,149 and 59,468 jobs annually for a two-year period, which is up from a 2014 report sponsored by the department that showed it would have only created 3,900 direct jobs and 21,050 total jobs over a two-year construction.
here I will help him outLMAO tell us you know nothing about the keystone XL without telling us you know nothing about the Keystone XL, you should go back and read this thread slowly so your post doesn't look so stupid LMAO
LMAO tell us you know nothing about the keystone XL without telling us you know nothing about the Keystone XL, you should go back and read this thread slowly so your post doesn't look so stupid LMAO
you do know back when Obama first vetoed the bill for it there was a move to override his veto and it fell 4 votes short and 3 or 4 Republican Senators voted against the override.Energy Dept report lied then?
And increase capacity with fewer and less severe environmental issues.The Keystone XL was going to be a branch of the Keystone Pipeline that currently exists pictured below which is a Canadian pipeline owned by TC Energy that carries Canadian tar sand oil for Asian markets but was never built. It had many issues being built fo over 10 years due to environmental concerns and eminent domain issues.
View attachment 67380265
It would have helped, no magic involved. The pipeline was much higher capacity than the existing line. It was also in addition to existing capacity. The difference is primarily shipped by rail.For those of you claiming that this would have magically helped
Pennies on the dollar. That is more than enough given the environmental benefit.the situation we are in now and we wouldn't be in it if it was built can you tell us what the average "gas" prices would factually be
in us (currently around 4.25)?
in the world (currently about 4.90)?
if it was built.
Economically sound is a given. That was checked to death before permits were issued.*if the word "factually" by all means guesstimate and support your guess with something intellectual, economically sound nad how the XL would fix the situation
Don't thank me yet.thanks!
Why not. They have more facts than you can bring to bear.oh yeah and for those that just think the pipeline was just "shut off" and needs to be turned back on, i wouldn't even post if i was you LOL
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?