• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

KBJ Should be Rejected by Any Self Respecting Woke Democrat

C

code1211

Banned
DP Veteran
Joined
Jul 13, 2012
Messages
47,695
Reaction score
10,468
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Other
I've been waiting for some expert somewhere on one of the Democrat Propaganda outlets to call out the obvious short coming of KBJ.

When asked if she could define the word "woman", she said that she could not because she was not a biologist.

BIOLOGIST? Seriously? Are genders defined based on biology? C'mon, KBJ! 1950 called and they want their thinking back.

Any good Democrat in 2022 understands that gender identification has NOTHING to do with biological considerations and everything to do psychological considerations.

Should be a slam dunk for Democrats to reject this heretic. Next thing you know, she'll be talking about X chromosomes and the age of adulthood.

This is blasphemy against Democrat Party Dogma and the Democrat Party High Priests need to step in and make things right!
 
Why are you spewing Republikkkan party dogma?
 
Michael Cole said:
Nah. I don't like her hair. Disqualify her for that

I hope you didn't waste too much time on the OP. She knows how to define woman. And she knows not to take the bait.
Click to expand...
Correct. The only reason she did not define woman was because of the direction the questions were going and she knew once she defined woman, Blackburn was going to bring up transgenders. Smart move by Jackson - she saw right through it

I really wish people would stick to threads already posted. This has been brought up ad nauseum
 
Useless thread, and a key reason that modern liberalism has power for short stints only.
 
Your entire post is a sad joke. The American public saw right through the kabuki theater of the GOP extremists, especially bullshit questions like the one you posed above. I can't even begin to imagine the breadth and depth of the faux outrage from the right if Brett Kavanaugh had been asked what the definition of a man was during his congressional hearings. They'd still be screaming on top of their lungs.

Your reach has far exceeded your grasp.
 
Should I go ahead and order tissues for you for when she is sworn in?

All the bullshit in the world isn't going to stop her confirmation.... Probably better to spend your time praying Thomas survives the scrutiny his ethics violation.... Perhaps we will see the second impeachment of a supreme court justice...
 
When all you got is her very smart answer to a dumb question....you know just how good she is. What has happened to American politics is so darn sad?
 
who os "KBJ"?
 
azgreg said:
What I got most from the KBJ's hearings is how intimately familiar the republicans are with child pornography.
Click to expand...
true-Biden has been on the public stage for decades
 

In what way would a biologist define what a woman might be?

A biologist would define "A Woman" as an adult human being with 2 X Chromosomes.

Why would anyone need a biologist to determine the gender of an adult if biology has no connection with the gender of an adult?
 
Gender is defined by grammarians. It has to do with words. For example, hers is the female-gendered possessive pronoun. Using gender as you are doing is inaccurate and confusing.

The term woman is defined by biology, so the prospective Supreme Court Justice is correct.

This is a better point. Ketanji Brown Jackson is being evasive.
 
TurtleDude said:
true-Biden has been on the public stage for decades
Click to expand...
I can't help but wonder why Barret wasn't asked that question by republicans, certainly she would be able to come up with a good answer.
Or, could it be Blackburn's question was just bait to draw KBJ into a transgender discussion?
 

Are you saying, then, that facts from biology are all that should determine what is a woman and what is not a woman?
 
911Sparky said:
I can't help but wonder why Barret wasn't asked that question by republicans, certainly she would be able to come up with a good answer.
Or, could it be Blackburn's question was just bait to draw KBJ into a transgender discussion?
Click to expand...
the crap with dudes swimming in girls events is going to be before the USSC in the near future
 
No self respecting liberal will listen to zero credibility traitor trolls and their nonsense lies
 
code1211 said:
Are you saying, then, that facts from biology are all that should determine what is a woman and what is not a woman?
Click to expand...
I’m saying it was a stupid question to pander to idiots.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Menu
Log in
Register
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…