• Please read the Announcement concerning missing posts from 10/8/25-10/15/25.
  • This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Justice Department Told Trump in May That His Name Is Among Many in the Epstein Files

This post is scum and the people spreading this crap - shouldn't be. It's rampant on this forum and I think it's a huge detriment to the entire forum.

Trump is a piece of ****. You knew this when he bragged about grabbing women by their privates in the 2016 election and you voted for him anyway because you don't give a flying **** about what terrible things he does because you've been taught that your hate for Democrats is more important than your love for the country.
 
A House Oversight panel subcommittee voted to subpoena Bill and Hillary Clinton on Wednesday over their alleged ties to notorious pedophile Jeffrey Epstein’s convicted accomplice, Ghislaine Maxwell

Raw meat for the rabid base. Clinton testifying isn't going to do anything, they're just trying to point your attention away from Maxwell herself, and from Donald Trump.

Clinton testifying will just be right wingers grandstanding and Clinton occasionally saying "I do not recall."
 
I know you don't. A bunch of powerful people raped children, for years, and you don't care.
Correct.

The DOJ has had almost a decade to bring anyone who raped someone to justice...over both Republican and Democratic administrations. If there was any there there, people would be in jail.

I don't share...and I don't care about...your desire to weaponize this issue against your political foes.

~snipped your utter bullshit~
 
Correct.

The DOJ has had almost a decade to bring anyone who raped someone to justice...over both Republican and Democratic administrations. If there was any there there, people would be in jail.

I don't share...and I don't care about...your desire to weaponize this issue against your political foes.
So now you're pretending to believe Ghislane Maxwell trafficked children to nobody.

I assume you'll be calling for her release. After all, you think she's an innocent woman.
 
Christians. When will you stand up?
Never. He lied. They told him he was in there. He then went onto say he wasn’t publicly. The charlatans look the other way as he continually and knowingly lies. I’m guessing they do too.
 
So now you're pretending to believe Ghislane Maxwell trafficked children to nobody.

I assume you'll be calling for her release. After all, you think she's an innocent woman.
I haven't said a thing about that woman. Keep your deflections to yourself. I'm not interested.
 
I haven't said a thing about that woman. Keep your deflections to yourself. I'm not interested.
So she did engage in human trafficking resulting in the rape of children?
 
Small wonder Trump pushed for total immunity for presidents even though he is calling for the arrest of Obama. I guess his rotting brain forgot Obama was president. 🤪
 
Last edited:
"Being mentioned in the records isn’t a sign of wrongdoing."

End of story. End of thread.

It may indeed, be. It would seem quite possible, with the lengths Trump is going through to cover-up his involvement.
 
So what does it mean when someone is on a list of high profile names?
Is that simply guilty by association? No due process for Trump?
No innocent until proven guilty of anything?
The Dems howl about not giving due process consideration to a migrant from El Salvador who was wrongly sent to a prison in EL Salvador.
But when it comes to a duly elected president sitting the White House, the unproven fact of Trump's name being on some list is enough to declare he is a pedophile.
Does anyone think that's a bit harsh given no indictment and no trial?

He's hiding everything, jaypatriot. You see what he's doing.
 
Does Elon have his own copy of the Epstein files?

GwoGX4SXEAAETBY

I'm wondering the same.
 
So you have already convicted him of pedophilia because he could be on some "list" that belonged to Epstein? Is that how justice for the most important leader in the entire world works now?
Or maybe because you are a fan of due process, you might consider another round of impeachment if the Dems take over the House? Would that be your concession to fair justice for a president?

Trump's protecting pedophiles for some reason, jaypatriot.
 
Trump's protecting pedophiles for some reason, jaypatriot.
We can discuss that when all of the evidence is uncovered.
But is your definitive statement anything more than just partisan speculation?
 
He released nothing. And the GOP are protecting him.
What a shock? A loyal GOP protecting their president.
I never heard of that before.
That being said, like Nixon in 1974, his own party could not defend him given the preponderance of evidence of a coverup of the Watergate scandal.
Don't you think evidence should be present before a president is found guilty (in public opinion) of being a pedophile or covering up for others?
 
He...said it out loud.

 
Didn't the Oversight Committee vote to subpoena the Epstein files yesterday? I know that won't necessarily lead to a release to the public (but it might end up being a first step toward a public release) - but it will certainly lead to a bipartisan group learning what is in those files.

I would guess that could very easily lead to Dems doing what Dems do and leaking (but leaking only anything which involves Trump) - which would infuriate Trump's team and thus ultimately lead to the full release. Day after day, Dems try to make the entire Epstein story about Trump and only Trump. I think they are so very consumed by their TDS that they actually lose sight of how ignorant it likely is to think Trump info will end up being among the most important and telling contents within those files.

This is playing games. The DOJ has all the files. Trump could release them, this very moment. Instead, he's protecting pedophiles.
 
Don't you think evidence should be present before a president is found guilty (in public opinion) of being a pedophile or covering up for others?
So why doesn't he release the evidence that would exonerate him?
 
Back
Top Bottom