• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
  • Welcome to our archives. No new posts are allowed here.

Julian Assange says his next leak will virtually guarantee an indictment of Hillary

Re: Julian Assange says his next leak will virtually guarantee an indictment of Hilla

Moot said:
UPDATE: Apparently, Trump knew Epstein, too. lol As the plot thickens....or sickens...

Trump Accused of Raping 13-Year-Old Girl in Federal Lawsuit
Click to expand...

Pretty sure that this lawsuit had already been debunked here in the forums and elsewhere.
Unless some validity can be demonstrated for this lawsuit, I don't think it needs to be considered as valid any further.

There is a corroborating pattern of behavior with Bill Clinton, however, there doesn't seem to be any with Trump.
 
Re: Julian Assange says his next leak will virtually guarantee an indictment of Hilla

eohrnberger said:
Pretty sure that this lawsuit had already been debunked here in the forums and elsewhere.
Unless some validity can be demonstrated for this lawsuit, I don't think it needs to be considered as valid any further.

There is a corroborating pattern of behavior with Bill Clinton, however, there doesn't seem to be any with Trump.
Click to expand...

Pretty sure most of the Clinton scandals and conspiracy theories have been debunked as well. But that hasn't stopped the right wing from repeating them as if they were weren't.

Validity...don't need no stinkin validity to falsely accuse someone of a crime...just ask the republican congress.
 
Re: Julian Assange says his next leak will virtually guarantee an indictment of Hilla

eohrnberger said:
Not sure if that's what Trump will do or not. You seem to have some sort of certainly about it. How did you come to this certainty of yours?
Click to expand...

You seem certain about your beliefs about me.

I take Trump at his word. Apparently the secret to supporting him is to not believe anything he says.
 
Re: Julian Assange says his next leak will virtually guarantee an indictment of Hilla

eohrnberger said:
Pretty sure that this lawsuit had already been debunked here in the forums and elsewhere.
Unless some validity can be demonstrated for this lawsuit, I don't think it needs to be considered as valid any further.

There is a corroborating pattern of behavior with Bill Clinton, however, there doesn't seem to be any with Trump.
Click to expand...

But he is connected to this guy just as Clinton is. You only care about Clinton.
 
Re: Julian Assange says his next leak will virtually guarantee an indictment of Hilla

Moot said:
Pretty sure most of the Clinton scandals and conspiracy theories have been debunked as well. But that hasn't stopped the right wing from repeating them as if they were weren't.

Validity...don't need no stinkin validity to falsely accuse someone of a crime...just ask the republican congress.
Click to expand...

Well, yeah...but but Clinton!
 
Re: Julian Assange says his next leak will virtually guarantee an indictment of Hilla

Moot said:
Pretty sure most of the Clinton scandals and conspiracy theories have been debunked as well. But that hasn't stopped the right wing from repeating them as if they were weren't.

Validity...don't need no stinkin validity to falsely accuse someone of a crime...just ask the republican congress.
Click to expand...

There's a difference between being falsely accused of something of a single instance, and repeated behavior of the same. The Clinton scandal history is an example of the latter.
 
Re: Julian Assange says his next leak will virtually guarantee an indictment of Hilla

rocket88 said:
So the answer is to elect someone who will really hang them out to dry?

America was great, in part, because of NATO. If he really wants to "make America great," abandoning NATO isn't the way to do it.
Click to expand...

rocket88 said:
You seem certain about your beliefs about me.

I take Trump at his word. Apparently the secret to supporting him is to not believe anything he says.
Click to expand...

In other words, no substantiation as to your assertion that Trump would 'hang US allies out to dry'.

In other words, no substantiation as to your assertion that Trump would abandon NATO.

Got it.
 
Re: Julian Assange says his next leak will virtually guarantee an indictment of Hilla

rocket88 said:
But he is connected to this guy just as Clinton is. You only care about Clinton.
Click to expand...

Where has that been established?
 
Re: Julian Assange says his next leak will virtually guarantee an indictment of Hilla

So, nothing new from Assange, then? Perhaps he is waiting for the DNC?
 
Re: Julian Assange says his next leak will virtually guarantee an indictment of Hilla

rocket88 said:
But he is connected to this guy just as Clinton is. You only care about Clinton.
Click to expand...

Either they are all pedophiles, or none of them are? That's pretty weak sauce.

The Wiki article that Moot cited, doesnt even have Trump's name in any of its text. How's that a connection of any kind?

Sorry, unproven.

A law suit filed in California, dismissed and refiles in New York, sounds awfully suspicious.

In late April 2016, rumors began to circulate online holding that Republican presidential Donald Trump had either been sued over, or arrested for, raping a teenaged girl. One of the earliest versions of the rumor was published on 2 May 2016 by the Winning Democrats web site, which reported that woman using the name Katie Johnson had named Trump and billionaire Jeffrey Epstein in a $100 million lawsuit, accusing them of having solicited sex acts from her at sex parties held at the Manhattan homes of Epstein and Trump back in 1994 (when Johnson was just 13 years old):
. . . .
A judge recommended on April 29 that “Katie Johnson” should have to pay her own attorneys’ fees and court costs related to the $100 million lawsuit she brought against Trump and billionaire pedophile Jeffrey Epstein over alleged sexual assault charges. Then on May 2, a U.S. District judge ordered the entire lawsuit thrown out.
Lawsuit Charges Donald Trump with Raping a 13-Year-Old Girl : snopes.com
Click to expand...

"the Winning Democrats web site" - That sure sounds rather suspicious. I wonder who could be behind that? Judge threw the whole thing out, only for it to be refiled in New York.

Yeah, this sounds just rock solid. :roll:

I think the law suit is little more than a fishing expedition, with suspicious supporters / funders.
 
Re: Julian Assange says his next leak will virtually guarantee an indictment of Hilla

DiAnna said:
This was covered in Comey's congressional hearings. She didn't request a "classification" be stripped off so that classified information could be sent without designation. There is a term for removing classified information in order to resend the rest of the document, the non-classified portion, to a non-secure source, and that is what she requested. Comey said this is common practice and has always been common practice.
Click to expand...

That's not what was claimed in the OP and Comey didn't get all the emails.
 
Re: Julian Assange says his next leak will virtually guarantee an indictment of Hilla

bubbabgone said:
Silence is Consent | BREAKING: WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange says his next leak will virtually guarantee an indictment of Hillary Clinton

Not much detail and leaving aside the Comey and Lynch speed bumps, this does sound interesting on its' face given the hacked DNC emails already released.
Click to expand...

Something not quite right here as the article refers to the FBI's ongoing investigation and expressing doubt Clinton will be indicted. These are past events, not active ones. Though the posted article has a 7/22 byline, it appears to actually be an older article.

The reference to the "declassification" that the it could be sent through a non-secure line was address by Comey before Congress. Folks, I think someone is trying to get you to bet on last year's Superbowl by showing you a tape and telling you its live action...
 
Re: Julian Assange says his next leak will virtually guarantee an indictment of Hilla

Moot said:
So Hillary is like Al Capone, now? :roll:
Click to expand...

No she is above the law.
 
Re: Julian Assange says his next leak will virtually guarantee an indictment of Hilla

calamity said:
Well, after watching everything from Whitewater to Benghazi, I disagree completely. But, I don't expect people who believe she murdered Vince Foster to agree.
Click to expand...

I didn't know she murdered any one? Oh well. What difference does it make?

It is her policies that I don't agree with.
 
Re: Julian Assange says his next leak will virtually guarantee an indictment of Hilla

PIPEWRENCH said:
No she is above the law.
Click to expand...

What law is she above?
 
Re: Julian Assange says his next leak will virtually guarantee an indictment of Hilla

Unitedwestand13 said:
Vladimir Putin.

He seems to be interested in the DNC for some reason.
Click to expand...

Who then likes Trump, and Trump likes Putin.

We're getting dangerously close to Glenn Beck territory! ;)
 
Re: Julian Assange says his next leak will virtually guarantee an indictment of Hilla

PIPEWRENCH said:
I didn't know she murdered any one? Oh well. What difference does it make?

It is her policies that I don't agree with.
Click to expand...

If people only attacked her policies, it wouldn't be a problem. The Hillary hate goes way beyond policy. How many people here in DP call her a bitch or worse? How many immediately target sex and seek to emasculate her male supporters?
 
Re: Julian Assange says his next leak will virtually guarantee an indictment of Hilla

Moot said:
What law is she above?
Click to expand...

If it was a Republican dodging Democratic witch hunts, these same people would be cheering her on. Remember these are some of the same people who celebrated Pailin's decision to quit her governor job and saw it as a final FY to the Alaskan democrats trying to nail her for corruption.
 
Re: Julian Assange says his next leak will virtually guarantee an indictment of Hilla

PIPEWRENCH said:
There have been many criminals that have skirted the law for that long and longer who never got held accountable. ....
Click to expand...

But enough about Trump.
 
Re: Julian Assange says his next leak will virtually guarantee an indictment of Hilla

Wiggen said:
Printing in purple makes you appear even more delusional than the other right wing extremists that post here. I appreciate it, however, as now I can just skip by your efforts without wasting my time.
Click to expand...
Agreed. The continued use of purple font is annoying -- just looks like a young teenager screaming for attention.

It does, however, make it easy to scroll over and ignore.
 
Re: Julian Assange says his next leak will virtually guarantee an indictment of Hilla

calamity said:
If people only attacked her policies, it wouldn't be a problem. The Hillary hate goes way beyond policy. How many people here in DP call her a bitch or worse? How many immediately target sex and seek to emasculate her male supporters?
Click to expand...

I have no problem pointing out the insanity of her policies. That is another thread. I could right a book and barely scratch the surface.
 
Re: Julian Assange says his next leak will virtually guarantee an indictment of Hilla

PIPEWRENCH said:
I have no problem pointing out the insanity of her policies. That is another thread. I could right a book and barely scratch the surface.
Click to expand...

Yea
You could "right" a book
Impressive credential
Look forward to reading it
 
Re: Julian Assange says his next leak will virtually guarantee an indictment of Hilla

upsideguy said:
Something not quite right here as the article refers to the FBI's ongoing investigation and expressing doubt Clinton will be indicted. These are past events, not active ones. Though the posted article has a 7/22 byline, it appears to actually be an older article.

The reference to the "declassification" that the it could be sent through a non-secure line was address by Comey before Congress. Folks, I think someone is trying to get you to bet on last year's Superbowl by showing you a tape and telling you its live action...
Click to expand...

Not sure what you're getting at but the emails and indictment Assange is referring to here has to do with the Clinton Foundation and the ongoing FBI investigation of it.
Not what Comey has already decided about the server investigation.
That's what I took from it.
I suppose he might have been suggesting that with new evidence of "intent", Comey might change his mind but I don't think so.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom