• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
  • Welcome to our archives. No new posts are allowed here.

Julian Assange says his next leak will virtually guarantee an indictment of Hillary

Re: Julian Assange says his next leak will virtually guarantee an indictment of Hilla

Wiggen said:
We saw that at the recently concluded convention, which reminded anybody with a sense of history of the Nuremburg rallies of the 1930's. Same fanaticism, same cult like devotion to their God.
Click to expand...


Please don't make Nazi comparisons. You just lose credibility in doing so.
 
Re: Julian Assange says his next leak will virtually guarantee an indictment of Hilla

Follow

RevoltPolitic
‏@RevoltPolitic
HAPPENING NOW: Sanders supporters, including delegates, are locked out of the DNC rules committee AND have been kicked out of the building.

Not sure of the truthiness of this.
 
Re: Julian Assange says his next leak will virtually guarantee an indictment of Hilla

Harry Guerrilla said:
I think Hillary/Kaine is done, doa.
It's over.

Just my opinion, but I really do.
Click to expand...

No they aren't. With all the baggage Hillary has on her, she's still made it this far. Same goes for Trump.
 
Re: Julian Assange says his next leak will virtually guarantee an indictment of Hilla

RetiredUSN said:
Yeah...Yeah....Yeah

I keep hearing the same BS by other paranoids like yourself.

Really? ..................Nuremberg rallies? Pretty stupid analogy..

You are just the most recent proof of what I stated to begin with.
Click to expand...

Did you prefer the chants of 'shoot her' or 'throw her in jail' at the convention? I'm guessing you're in the 'shoot her' crowd. And yeah, we've already seen the soft spot Trumpies have for the Heil salute. Nuremberg is a great analogy. Just submit 'Jews' for 'Clinton' and it would be hard to tell them apart.
 
Re: Julian Assange says his next leak will virtually guarantee an indictment of Hilla

TheGoverness said:
Please don't make Nazi comparisons. You just lose credibility in doing so.
Click to expand...

Please don't lecture me. You don't have the education or life experience to do so. And maintaining credibility with you is not real high on my list of priorities.
 
Re: Julian Assange says his next leak will virtually guarantee an indictment of Hilla

Wiggen said:
Did you prefer the chants of 'shoot her' or 'throw her in jail' at the convention? I'm guessing you're in the 'shoot her' crowd. And yeah, we've already seen the soft spot Trumpies have for the Heil salute. Nuremberg is a great analogy. Just submit 'Jews' for 'Clinton' and it would be hard to tell them apart.
Click to expand...
I preferred the chants to throw her in jail, they're more suitable to her crimes.
 
Re: Julian Assange says his next leak will virtually guarantee an indictment of Hilla

Wiggen said:
Please don't lecture me. You don't have the education or life experience to do so. And maintaining credibility with you is not real high on my list of priorities.
Click to expand...

I was just making a suggestion. I wasn't "lecturing" you.
 
Re: Julian Assange says his next leak will virtually guarantee an indictment of Hilla

Wiggen said:
Did you prefer the chants of 'shoot her' or 'throw her in jail' at the convention? I'm guessing you're in the 'shoot her' crowd. And yeah, we've already seen the soft spot Trumpies have for the Heil salute. Nuremberg is a great analogy. Just submit 'Jews' for 'Clinton' and it would be hard to tell them apart.
Click to expand...

Wiggen said:
Please don't lecture me. You don't have the education or life experience to do so. And maintaining credibility with you is not real high on my list of priorities.
Click to expand...

Looks like a Godwin violation to me. On his worst day Trump is Huey Long, not Adolph Hitler.
 
Re: Julian Assange says his next leak will virtually guarantee an indictment of Hilla

Wiggen said:
Did you prefer the chants of 'shoot her' or 'throw her in jail' at the convention? I'm guessing you're in the 'shoot her' crowd. And yeah, we've already seen the soft spot Trumpies have for the Heil salute. Nuremberg is a great analogy. Just submit 'Jews' for 'Clinton' and it would be hard to tell them apart.
Click to expand...

See.....there ya go with the typical liberal drivel.

Ya see there Aristotle?..........................I am not a republican.
 
Re: Julian Assange says his next leak will virtually guarantee an indictment of Hilla

Harry Guerrilla said:
Follow

RevoltPolitic
‏@RevoltPolitic
HAPPENING NOW: Sanders supporters, including delegates, are locked out of the DNC rules committee AND have been kicked out of the building.

Not sure of the truthiness of this.
Click to expand...

Doesn't report of a lockout, but it's the "freshest" news I could find.


Effort to abolish superdelegates fails at DNC rules meeting - The Daily Times: National/World
 
Re: Julian Assange says his next leak will virtually guarantee an indictment of Hilla

TheGoverness said:
No they aren't. With all the baggage Hillary has on her, she's still made it this far. Same goes for Trump.
Click to expand...

Trump had help from Democrats, notice he consistently did better in open primaries, and "The most votes". No, Republicans weren't just spawning to vote for the first time ever for Trump. Democrats knew Hillary had it and were voting for Trump, and in open primaries, Democrats were voting for their candidate, then completely legally voting for Trump. Hillary had Communist opponent, which basically gave her the win by default. Nobody even knew who the other guy was, and he got no media attention, while the news stations talked about Hillary non-stop.
 
Re: Julian Assange says his next leak will virtually guarantee an indictment of Hilla

bubbabgone said:
http://silenceisconsent.net/breakin...illary-clinton/#sthash.y2hjscEV.XlUBeoXU.dpbs

Not much detail and leaving aside the Comey and Lynch speed bumps, this does sound interesting on its' face given the hacked DNC emails already released.
Click to expand...

She is protected and if/when Assange ends up dead what does it matter? I will believe it when I see it.


Sent from my grapefruit using smoke signals.
 
Re: Julian Assange says his next leak will virtually guarantee an indictment of Hilla

Unitedwestand13 said:
Considering that it was Russian hackers that hacked the DNC, I think Putin is trying to make trump the winner.
Click to expand...

I don't know why. Trump seems unpredictable compared to Hilary.


Sent from my grapefruit using smoke signals.
 
Re: Julian Assange says his next leak will virtually guarantee an indictment of Hilla

TheGoverness said:
No they aren't. With all the baggage Hillary has on her, she's still made it this far. Same goes for Trump.
Click to expand...

Greetings, TheGoverness. :2wave:

It reminds me of the Beatles song "I get by with a little help from my friends..." :lol:
 
Re: Julian Assange says his next leak will virtually guarantee an indictment of Hilla

Moot said:
What the OP quoted were emails that were released months ago. They are not new revelations or a game changer because they've already been dissected, chewed up and spit out by the media.

From the OP....


Those stones have already been turned over by congress and the FBI and there is no there...there.

I think I would respect Assange a lot more if he didn't show his political bias. The timing of this release just before the DNC convention is too politically obvious to be believed except by the most gullible and politically naïve.
Click to expand...


^^ This.
 
Re: Julian Assange says his next leak will virtually guarantee an indictment of Hilla

Pumpkin Row said:
Read the laws instead of taking someone's word for it. I'd like to think you're someone who thinks for themselves instead of taking someone's word for it because. Just because. I just showed you every law she broke based on Comey's information. This means that Comey has unintentionally testified against her. He also never specifically said she broke no laws. If I recall correctly, and I'm fairly certain I do, all he said was that using a private server did not break the law, not that what she did with it didn't break the law.
Click to expand...

I have read the laws and I agree with Comey...she did not commit a crime.

In this country a prosecutor has to prove Mens rea (intent) and Actus reum (commited) to indict for a crime. The FBI did not find either in Clintons case.
 
Re: Julian Assange says his next leak will virtually guarantee an indictment of Hilla

Moot said:
I have read the laws and I agree with Comey...she did not commit a crime.

In this country a prosecutor has to prove Mens rea (intent) and Actus reum (commited) to indict for a crime. The FBI did not find either in Clintons case.
Click to expand...

Assange has hinted his focus is the Clinton Foundation. We shall see.
 
Re: Julian Assange says his next leak will virtually guarantee an indictment of Hilla

ocean515 said:
:shock:

Wait a minute. Are you implying you are working with Julian Assange?
Click to expand...

Either that, or she's one hell of a speed reader to get through 20,000 emails already? There is one other potential answer, which I lean toward in this instance - blind partisanship.
 
Re: Julian Assange says his next leak will virtually guarantee an indictment of Hilla

Unitedwestand13 said:
Considering that it was Russian hackers that hacked the DNC, I think Putin is trying to make trump the winner.
Click to expand...

Could be. However, if the leaked documents become the evidentiary proof needed for an indictment and then a conviction, it will be Hillary herself that will have done that, since it will be the documentation of actions she's taken that will have lead to that point, regardless of who hacked and then leaked them for whatever reason.
 
Re: Julian Assange says his next leak will virtually guarantee an indictment of Hilla

Moot said:
I have read the laws and I agree with Comey...she did not commit a crime.

In this country a prosecutor has to prove Mens rea (intent) and Actus reum (commited) to indict for a crime. The FBI did not find either in Clintons case.
Click to expand...
Then what purpose does lying serve? Usually it serves to cover up something that someone knows they did wrong. I'm also fairly certain that dismantling your server, destroying evidence, and the fact that she waited a full two years before destroying said evidence(During an investigation), and use of multiple servers and devices shows pretty clear intent.

Not only that but they can also show that the actions were a result of gross negligence, and Comey clearly stated that Clinton was extremely careless. Both words happen to be synonyms of gross negligence, showing up as references when searching for the definitions of either word. Given that she clearly broke all of those laws I showed, and the evidence I just provided, all things she was stated to have done by the FBI, she either grossly negligent or doing said things intentionally. Either one can be proven from a reasonable perspective. It's entirely possible a prosecutor wouldn't take up the case, but what's clearly evident from what we can clearly observe is that she's guilty. Lack of indictment does not mean lack of guilt. We can all clearly see what her intentions were. She was hiding her communications because she didn't want them archived, turned over what she was okay with being seen, then tried to hide what she didn't want seen, and dismantled her server.

If you disagree, then please explain to me what her intentions were when keeping her emails from being archived, deleting the work-related emails she didn't turn over, lying about her actions, and using multiple devices while claiming she used one.
 
Re: Julian Assange says his next leak will virtually guarantee an indictment of Hilla

DiAnna said:
This was covered in Comey's congressional hearings. She didn't request a "classification" be stripped off so that classified information could be sent without designation. There is a term for removing classified information in order to resend the rest of the document, the non-classified portion, to a non-secure source, and that is what she requested. Comey said this is common practice and has always been common practice.
Click to expand...

I think what they're saying, is that there may be proof in the hacked documents that the FBI didn't see that may prove she may have done exactly that. That's at least what it sounds like. As for me, it's all BS until whatever it is, is actually disclosed and authenticated.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom