- Joined
- Nov 16, 2017
- Messages
- 83,189
- Reaction score
- 82,453
- Location
- Southern CA.
- Gender
- Female
- Political Leaning
- Independent
Or maybe the Russians - who have been trying to infiltrate Signal - helped the editor/reporter gain access.Well then, he was invited to the group chat. He didn't add himself. The only way to gain access was to be sent an invite.
Could have been Russia.I have complete confidence that they will find out who added an anti-Trump political hack to the signal chat. They'll also find out that it was no accident that somebody like him was included.
You believe in crystal balls? That’s an idiotic post, backatcha on the nice day!The real problem for our nation's national security is how the hell a well-known anti-Trump political hack's name was added to a high-level government group chat. Who did this? Was this done during the Biden administration as an attempt to set Trump's people up? I put nothing past the slimy Democrats. Nothing.
Post #71He was not invited.
He's not doing that either but, as always, it's your world and the rest f us just live here.He's been cutting Congress out by grabbing its power of the purse.
Yep, plenty of American whiskey sitting on the shelves with no place to go thanks to Trump's tariffs and threat of tariffs...Who is in charge of popping the popcorn?
Since i'm in Tennessee, i'll supply the booze. Plenty of distilleries here.
Sure, he's grabbing the power of the purse. Remember, he's Executive Ordering his way around monies allocated by the Legislative Branch.He's not doing that either but, as always, it's your world and the rest f us just live here.
it was mother****ingWell then, he was invited to the group chat. He didn't add himself. The only way to gain access was to be sent an invite.
The multi-billion dollar encrypted comms system the US government has designed just for this purpose. The government builds and maintains a SCIF for every one of these principles just for this type of thing.What is the alternative to Signal?
SCIF | |
---|---|
Purpose | Protect sensitive information from unauthorized access |
Location | Federal buildings, military installations, embassies, and government contracting offices |
Security | Reinforced doors, walls, and floors, soundproofing, and motion sensors |
Access | Limited to those with the appropriate security clearance |
Electronics | Most electronics are banned, but cell phone detectors are often used |
Types | Fixed, temporary, and mobile |
The crooked judge won't recuse himself because he's part of the scam to bring Trump's people down. He'll take his sweet time with this.
Also, the Democrats and their crooked legacy media will keep this fiasco, they no doubt helped to create, alive until after the midterms. I have no doubt the Democrats found someone who is responsible for illegally adding creepy boy, Democrat Goldberg's name to the chat. Who else would do this but them? Yeah, there's a conspiracy. The Trump administration should now go over everything they say and do with a fine-toothed comb. Also, Goldberg should have told the powers that be that his name was added in error to a chat two days before the actual chat began. Why didn't he? He was in on it.
...then why did the Pentagon state commercial apps like Signal should not be used?From this morning: The Democrats shit show
Wednesday, March 26
Gabbard, Ratcliffe and FBI Director Kash Patel are among officials appearing before the House Intelligence Committee to discuss global threats to the U.S. The hearing was scheduled before The Atlantic’s revelations.
“I used an appropriate channel to communicate sensitive information,” Ratcliffe said. “It was permissible to do so. I didn’t transfer any classified information.”
Like Joe Biden's garage, Trump's chandelier bathroom or Hillary Clinton's storage room on Martha's Vineyard?Oh, I dunno. Maybe a special secure room where these types of conversations can take place?
Hey, I'm with you. Cut congress out of the equation entirely, especially when the majority in the House and the Senate are the same as the White House. In such a case the ONLY branch of government we can rely on is the Judicial and they should have absolute, unfettered power. The LAST thing we need in a situation like this is a federal government that serves the people. We need a federal government that serves the government!
That's how I felt about Aileen Cannon.For real. And if anyone thinks this was a random assignment they're smoking something.
You mean the same crooked judge who ruled in favor of Clinton information the FBI discovered be released and the one who was lenient on J6 rioters?The crooked judge won't recuse himself because he's part of the scam to bring Trump's people down. He'll take his sweet time with this.
How did they help create it when administration officials were the ones who inadvertently invited him and made this a story?Also, the Democrats and their crooked legacy media will keep this fiasco, they no doubt helped to create, alive until after the midterms.
Of course this has to be the most logical explanation, because there's no way the same folks who had to retract claims of fraud numerous times because they got it all wrong could never make that mistake. "The Democrats forced Waltz to add a phone number he did not recognize to the chat!" Makes perfect sense.I have no doubt the Democrats found someone who is responsible for illegally adding creepy boy, Democrat Goldberg's name to the chat. Who else would do this but them? Yeah, there's a conspiracy.
Indeed. Had they done so from the start, they wouldn't have used Signal to begin with since the Pentagon said that was a no-no and avoided this mess.The Trump administration should now go over everything they say and do with a fine-toothed comb.
That doesn't necessarily follow. He doesn't have to be in on the incompetence he is reporting on. The story here is top level government officials added him to a chat he should never have been a part of; that is a news story. Or, are you in favor of the news media not report these things in order to protect the government?Also, Goldberg should have told the powers that be that his name was added in error to a chat two days before the actual chat began. Why didn't he? He was in on it.
This judge just got the nod from the appeals court in the deportation case.Ruh Ro!
I can hear the fireworks from here, stay tuned…….
Why did Waltz add a number he didn't recognize to the chat?I have complete confidence that they will find out who added an anti-Trump political hack to the signal chat. They'll also find out that it was no accident that somebody like him was included.
How 'bout the backroom at the Wild Orchid.Like Joe Bidens garage, Trump's chandelier bathroom or Hillary Clinton's storage room on Martha's Vineyard?
Your argument is that, when someone breaks the law, our judges should not be able to do anything about it.This is good. Boasberg can now find all parties guilty and remove the entire Trump administration. This is the way the Constitution is supposed to work! If a district judge isn't allowed to dissolve the sitting administration then we simply don't have a democracy.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?