Judge rejects challenges to Georgia voters before Senate runoffs

[Rawley]

That is a nice story. First off, I voted for Jo, not Joe. I have voted for one Dem for POTUS in my lifetime and that was almost 30 years ago.

Yes. You've argued that before. No one is buying it.

second, while it probably helps you sleep at night to tell yourself that about why your god lost, the fact of the matter is that more than 58 judges, 3 state supreme courts and the US supreme court all disagree with you.

ONe judge disgreed with me. And she should have recused herself. FOcus,. Your obsession with TRump has overtaken your life

 

[Slartibartfast]

Yes. You've argued that before. No one is buying it.


ONe judge disgreed with me. And she should have recused herself. FOcus,. Your obsession with TRump has overtaken your life

I think your shift key is sticky

 

[Rawley]

I think your shift key is sticky

My fingers get ahead of themselves sometimes

 

[GolfingChef]

Yes. You've argued that before. No one is buying it.

that is because you partisan sheep cannot fathom anyone being outside of one of the two sheep pens, you are just not capable of understanding someone that has not sworn their soul to one party or the other.

 

[iliveonramen]

Nope. "Voter suppression" means something entirely different to the Democrats that it does to every patriotic American.

Can you clarify? What exactly does voter suppression mean to each group?

 

[GolfingChef]

ONe judge disgreed with me. And she should have recused herself. FOcus,. Your obsession with TRump has overtaken your life

You should get out more, this is not the only case to allege illegal votes since the last election.

 

[Rawley]

Can you clarify? What exactly does voter suppression mean to each group?

To patriotic American is means efforts to stop people from legally voting.

To Democrats it means any efforts to ensure only legal votes are counted - VOter ID, signature verification, requesting mail-in ballots, efforts to ensure integrity of registration rolls, ballot challenges...

 

[Rawley]

You should get out more, this is not the only case to allege illegal votes since the last election.

Perhaps you should go to another thread to vent your Trump hate.

 

[iliveonramen]

To patriotic American is means efforts to stop people from legally voting.

To Democrats it means any efforts to ensure only legal votes are counted - VOter ID, signature verification, requesting mail-in ballots, efforts to ensure integrity of registration rolls, ballot challenges...

There’s always suggestions of wide spread illegal voting on the right but never any proof.

So why are Republican’s so insistent on solving a problem that doesn’t exist while making it even more annoying and cumbersome to vote?

 

[Rawley]

There’s always suggestions of wide spread illegal voting on the right but never any proof.

So why are Republican’s so insistent on solving a problem that doesn’t exist while making it even more annoying and cumbersome to vote?

These people filed change of address forms stating that they moved out of Georgia. Then they voted in this election. You don't think this is a problem? You don't think it's worth investigating whether they voted illegally? Really? How is this making it "more annoying and cumbersome to vote?"

 

[GolfingChef]

Perhaps you should go to another thread to vent your Trump hate.

perhaps you should keep up with the news

 

[jakiejakester]

And we realize that the only way you DEmocrats can win is with illegal votes - the point of the Counties' action. Sad.

How sadly pathetic that anyone can be so duped into believing that the election was fraudulent! It means that you do not believe the DOJ, DHS, the Attorney General, CISA, the GOP Governors and Secretaries of States in Georgia et al BUT you do believe all the debunked conspiracy theories that sore losers cling to! It's to the point that no matter how many times courts, facts and recounts are done you'll never accept the results. Why? Because Trump to you that the election was stolen from him? You nor anyone else has shown any proof/evidence to dispute the results yet you relentlessly post made up shit that is so easy to disprove. We can disprove everything you claim yet YOU can't prove anything that you claim.

Trump lost and in 21 days he will be gone thanks to the will of the people.

 

[jakiejakester]

ONe judge disgreed with me. And she should have recused herself. FOcus,. Your obsession with TRump has overtaken your life

HAHA! You need to look in the mirror. The only people here who have allowed Trump to "overtake" their lives are Trump supporters. What the rest of us have done is vote him out of office and it wasn't close. Trump's the only President to have never won the popular vote and he's relegated to being a sad, one-term President who history will remember as the worst President in American history. BYE DON!

 

[Rawley]

HAHA! You need to look in the mirror. The only people here who have allowed Trump to "overtake" their lives are Trump supporters. What the rest of us have done is vote him out of office and it wasn't close. Trump's the only President to have never won the popular vote and he's relegated to being a sad, one-term President who history will remember as the worst President in American history. BYE DON!

Georgia. Senate run offs. Focus. Lose the hate

 

[iliveonramen]

These people filed change of address forms stating that they moved out of Georgia. Then they voted in this election. You don't think this is a problem? You don't think it's worth investigating whether they voted illegally? Really? How is this making it "more annoying and cumbersome to vote?"

A) They didn’t vote in this election. It’s a voter role purge and pre-emptive not as a result of out of state people voting.

B) The list is like 4k names.

C) Purging voter roles with 90 days of a Fed election with zero notice is not allowed.

 

[Rawley]

A) They didn’t vote in this election. It’s a voter role purge and pre-emptive not as a result of out of state people voting.

B) The list is like 4k names.

C) Purging voter roles with 90 days of a Fed election with zero notice is not allowed.

It is not a purge. No one is touching the registration rolls. The Counties were allowing them to vote, but only provisional ballots. Stacy's sister said nope. Read the whole story not just the propaganda from Stacy and Mark "Steele Dossier" Elias

 

[iliveonramen]

It is not a purge. No one is touching the registration rolls. The Counties were allowing them to vote, but only provisional ballots. Stacy's sister said nope. Read the whole story not just the propaganda from Stacy and Mark "Steele Dossier" Elias

I read it from politico..what “non-propaganda” site are you referring to?

 

[Rawley]

I read it from politico..what “non-propaganda” site are you referring to?

The AJC article in the OP

I found the Politico story. Yes. As per typical, they printed the left's propaganda

 

[GolfingChef]

These people filed change of address forms stating that they moved out of Georgia. Then they voted in this election. You don't think this is a problem? You don't think it's worth investigating whether they voted illegally?

Ironically, the judge you hate so much said it is worth investigating, but that the people cannot be removed until such time as it is investigated.

She said the change of address form alone is not enough, which seems pretty logical to me

 

[Rawley]

Ironically, the judge you hate so much said it is worth investigating, but that the people cannot be removed until such time as it is investigated.

She said the change of address form alone is not enough, which seems pretty logical to me

Sorry, I don't share your vitriol. I simple said she should of recused herself.

And no one was removing anyone from the rolls. Made-up propaganda from the Plaintiffs. Facts matter (to some of us)

 

[OpportunityCost]

Other than a relationship, what evidence do you have that there is any bias or impartiality problems?

Any appearance of impropriety or favoritism is to be avoided so as to prevent accusations of bias and favoritism. Its called ethics.

Don't even try to play the orange man bad card, it doesn't alleviate ethical decisions on the part of judges.

 

[Luce]

Yeah, but it's still not as cool as having a brother that is the governor of the state that determines whether or not you get elected.

Or, in Kemp's case, it's even cooler when you get to be the secretary of state in your own election and decide who gets to vote.

 

[Luce]

Not on the surface, no. I disagree with the judge not recusing herself. The optics are piss poor.

If the intent is to issue a fair ruling that is in accordance with the law, then surely a different judge could have done the same thing and all of this could have been avoided.

Dude, the president hired his whole damn family. Nobody gives a shit about optics anymore.

 

[weaver2]

If Republicans put the energy they expend in suppressing/depressing the votes of Americans into actually helping Americans instead, they then might have one hell of a political party.

The $2000 aid package is emblematic of the problem. McConnell will find some way of blocking it. Why would he block help right now when people are so desperate: because blocking it weakens the economy, makes Biden more likely to fail. It's a power play and McConnell doesn't care who gets hurt just so long as he retains the power over the Senate.

 

[mrjurrs]

Any appearance of impropriety or favoritism is to be avoided so as to prevent accusations of bias and favoritism. Its called ethics.

Don't even try to play the orange man bad card, it doesn't alleviate ethical decisions on the part of judges.

And who gets to make that call? The judge. If it appears the judge has acted unethically, the state judicial commission (or whatever GA calls it) will call a hearing and determine if there has been an ethical violation. If there was, the judge will pay.

Is there any way you can tie your definition of ethics to djt?