• Please read the Announcement concerning missing posts from 10/8/25-10/15/25.
  • This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Judge critical of Trump administration's attempt to control testimony of former official

veritas1 said:
Please. There is such a thing as Executive privilege and Trump is under no obligation to participate in his own political railroading by partisan hacks holed up in secret. BTW, Dems were calling for Trump's impeachment on inauguration day. What crime could Trump have broken before even entering office? I found it hilarious watching the Dems try to put on their serious faces yesterday and claim they took no joy in their vote. They were absolutely pissing themselves with glee. Nobody is fooled by this Schiffshow and the blowback will be substantial.
Click to expand...

The law he broke was campaign finance violation. Paying off the porn stars the way he did it was illegal. Michael Cohen is in prison in part for that crime. That's just the beginning. So you all can protect and defend him all you want. In the end, he will pay for his crimes, and we will have to put the government back together.
 
veritas1 said:
The WB was NOT a witness to the Zelensky call nor anything pertaining to Trump's communications with him and THAT was the basis for this entire charade. As for the WB language above, it is unequivocal and clear. It says the complaint will NOT be processed at all, not that it will be evaluated. This is plain and easy to read for everyone except liberals who ask you not to believe your lyin' eyes.
Click to expand...

Yawn. The IG issued a rare direct statement stating that the WB indeed had/has first hand knowledge of the call.

Paying attention to the facts: it's what's for breakfast!
 
Rogue Valley said:
Judge critical of Trump administration's attempt to control testimony of former official

3dfac748-88ec-49ab-9134-6e25a5d90065.jpg

Former White House counsel Don McGahn



This federal judge appears to not be sympathetic to the White House argument that it can order people that have been issued a subpoena by the House to refuse to testify.

Her ruling will set the precedent for all such WH stonewalling refusals.
Click to expand...


One law for Trump...
 
Rogue Valley said:
Judge critical of Trump administration's attempt to control testimony of former official

3dfac748-88ec-49ab-9134-6e25a5d90065.jpg

Former White House counsel Don McGahn



This federal judge appears to not be sympathetic to the White House argument that it can order people that have been issued a subpoena by the House to refuse to testify.

Her ruling will set the precedent for all such WH stonewalling refusals.
Click to expand...


That's because the Trump House has invented an entirely new decree of blanket "Constitutional Immunity" which basically means that if you even so much as had a Trump/Pence sticker on your car in 2015, you're immune from anything and everything.

Naturally, such an immunity has never existed and never will.
And I guarantee you wouldn't want it to, either.
 
JasperL said:
Again, you're confusing instructions on a form with the law, and the law doesn't give a damn about the instructions. It was processed, found credible, because it was credible. You can wish the whole incident was buried, as the WH tried to do, but they failed, and now how it came to light just does not matter. No one violated any law in filing or evaluating the complaint, nor in finding it credible, passing it to the DNI, etc.

I mean, it's sad and all, boo hoo, that Trump got caught but no one cares that you're sad.
Click to expand...

Yea, they tried to bury it so much that they immediately released the transcript.:lol: Why does reality always contradict you guys? Again, the WB rules were clear and straightforward and DID NOT allow for second hand information. No wonder it had to be changed.
 
The AntiDonald said:
The law he broke was campaign finance violation. Paying off the porn stars the way he did it was illegal. Michael Cohen is in prison in part for that crime. That's just the beginning. So you all can protect and defend him all you want. In the end, he will pay for his crimes, and we will have to put the government back together.
Click to expand...

Nonsense. A Non-Disclosure Agreement is 100% legal and Trump used his own money, NOT campaign money. You guys had nothing then and you have nothing now.
 
veritas1 said:
Yea, they tried to bury it so much that they immediately released the transcript.:lol: Why does reality always contradict you guys? Again, the WB rules were clear and straightforward and DID NOT allow for second hand information. No wonder it had to be changed.
Click to expand...

A laughable and now boring lie. No transcript was released. The IG confirmed in a public statement that the WB had 1st hand information.

Reality wants to be your friend.
 
Tanngrisnir said:
Yawn. The IG issued a rare direct statement stating that the WB indeed had/has first hand knowledge of the call.

Paying attention to the facts: it's what's for breakfast!
Click to expand...

Facts are not something you deal in, ever. From the WB Complaint:

I was not a direct witness to most of the events described. However, I found my colleagues’ accounts of these events to be credible because, in almost all cases, multiple officials recounted fact patterns that were consistent with one another. In addition, a variety of information consistent with these private accounts has been reported publicly.


Fail.
 
veritas1 said:
Nonsense. A Non-Disclosure Agreement is 100% legal and Trump used his own money, NOT campaign money. You guys had nothing then and you have nothing now.
Click to expand...

Already proven that they used campaign money and specifically set up shell companies to do so.

You lose. Again.
 
Tanngrisnir said:
A laughable and now boring lie. No transcript was released. The IG confirmed in a public statement that the WB had 1st hand information.

Reality wants to be your friend.
Click to expand...

Right, now there was no transcript. You're delusional.
 
veritas1 said:
Facts are not something you deal in, ever. From the WB Complaint:

I was not a direct witness to most of the events described. However, I found my colleagues’ accounts of these events to be credible because, in almost all cases, multiple officials recounted fact patterns that were consistent with one another. In addition, a variety of information consistent with these private accounts has been reported publicly.


Fail.
Click to expand...

Irrelevant, given the IG confirmed the WB did, in fact, have 1st hand information.

You just can't help but run from reality, and that's fun!

I win, you lose, again.

Intelligence IG Refutes Trump’ False Claims About Whistleblower
 
veritas1 said:
Right, now there was no transcript. You're delusional.
Click to expand...

A memo summarizing the 30 minute call, w/20 minutes unaccounted for, was released.

No actual transcript was.

No amount of tears from twump sycophants will change that reality.

You remember? Reality? That thing you can't face?
 
Rogue Valley said:
H

At any rate, Trump will be gone in January 2021.
Click to expand...
I wouldn't bet on it.
The Dem candidates are beyond lame.

The 3 frontrunners are 2 sociaist geezers.

And a half-senile ( being generous) really old geezer.

that' the best you could do? Really?
 
ttwtt78640 said:
Great, so let's let the public hear it - first hand.
Click to expand...

How deliciously irrelevant. The complaints of the WB have now been confirmed, under oath, by numerous other officials.

You don't really understand how this all works, do you?
 
Tanngrisnir said:
A memo summarizing the 30 minute call, w/20 minutes unaccounted for, was released.

No actual transcript was.

No amount of tears from twump sycophants will change that reality.

You remember? Reality? That thing you can't face?
Click to expand...

You're apparently unable to wrap your head around the fact that reading a transcript is faster than the interchange it describes. Nothing is unaccounted for. You're simply lying again.
 
ttwtt78640 said:
Great, so let's let the public hear it - first hand.
Click to expand...

They're desperately trying to protect the so called WB because they know if he's subjected to a public grilling it'll become all too obvious that he's nothing but a Democrat hack and operative who coordinated with Schiff's office and has ties to Biden, Brennan AND Ukraine. The whole thing is a pathetic and all too obvious political hatchet job being run by the biggest liar who's ever darkened Congress. Yet, the left gleefully supports it all, of course.
 
Tanngrisnir said:
How deliciously irrelevant. The complaints of the WB have now been confirmed, under oath, by numerous other officials.

You don't really understand how this all works, do you?
Click to expand...

If this alleged quid pro quo was so obvious can you explain why there was a quid but no quo ???????
 
veritas1 said:
You're apparently unable to wrap your head around the fact that reading a transcript is faster than the interchange it describes. Nothing is unaccounted for. You're simply lying again.
Click to expand...

Over 20 minutes are unaccounted for, and the LC under sworn testimony, says text was changed.

You lose again.

Seriously, why lie so much? What's the point?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom