• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Jim Jordan Should Be Disqualified From Ballot Over Jan. 6 - 14th Amendment, Sec 3

Should Jim Jordan be DISQUALIFIED from the ballot based on the 14th Amendment?


  • Total voters
    34
All of them would be fine to investigate and possibly take actions as well, but somebody needs to the first one - so my personal choice is Rep Jordan.

My first choice would be Ted Cruz. But yes, Jim Jordan was definitely seditious.
 
My first choice would be Ted Cruz. But yes, Jim Jordan was definitely seditious.
Jordan has been very much in contact with DJT - the chief instigator of the attempted coup at the Capitol.
 
Jordan has been very much in contact with DJT - the chief instigator of the attempted coup at the Capitol.

I always knew he loves Trump the Terrorist. Thank God he was never my Representative≥
 
He may be in waiting hopefully soon like DJT is.
Given the amount of information we have at our disposal. The answer to both of those questions is apparently going to be a resounding no.
 
He won’t be when the House flips to the GOPutins, as you well know.
So you think it would be any better under the control of the party of Epstein?

Yeah, go ahead and take that conspiracy theory crap down to the basement.
 
Because of his actions before, during, and after the January sixth insurrection.

What did you think we were referring to?
Yes comrade, who needs messy elections where the voters may select nasty Republican traitors. It's our patriotic duty to purge ballots of anyone disloyal to the Democrat party. Simply weaponize election boards to "purify" ballots on the basis of so-called reasonable suspicion. It's classic KGB tactics repackaged as defense of democracy.

The January 6th stop the steal rally had permits for the rallies a mile or so away and on the Capitol grounds. Communications with rally organizers aren't proof of insurrection no matter what Democrats would like to pervert into an excuse for political repression.
 
Yes comrade, who needs messy elections where the voters may select nasty Republican traitors. It's our patriotic duty to purge ballots of anyone disloyal to the Democrat party. Simply weaponize election boards to "purify" ballots on the basis of so-called reasonable suspicion. It's classic KGB tactics repackaged as defense of democracy.

The January 6th stop the steal rally had permits for the rallies a mile or so away and on the Capitol grounds. Communications with rally organizers aren't proof of insurrection no matter what Democrats would like to pervert into an excuse for political repression.
Lol, The insurrection is proof of insurrection. That's all that's needed.
 
Lol, The insurrection is proof of insurrection. That's all that's needed.
Right, no proof is needed that Jordan was involved or endorsed the so-called insurrection. All that's needed is unsupported allegations adopted by true believers. Lol.
 
Right, no proof is needed that Jordan was involved or endorsed the so-called insurrection. All that's needed is unsupported allegations adopted by true believers. Lol.

The fact that he refuses to co-operate should send him to jail for contempt.
 
The select committee is engaging in a partisan witch hunt; without legislative purpose. There is nothing wrong with resisting an illegal subpoena.

Nancy Pelosi hand picked committee members. She ought to be summoned to answer questions about her refusal to increase security despite multiple advance requests. She has a huge conflict of interest that should have compelled her to recuse herself from the process
Oh sorry, the whole purpose of the partisan circus is to destroy Republicans.
 
The select committee is engaging in a partisan witch hunt; without legislative purpose. There is nothing wrong with resisting an illegal subpoena.

How can a subpoena be illegal ?
How is this one illegal ?

Nancy Pelosi hand picked committee members. She ought to be summoned to answer questions about her refusal to increase security despite multiple advance requests. She has a huge conflict of interest that should have compelled her to recuse herself from the process
Oh sorry, the whole purpose of the partisan circus is to destroy Republicans.

Which Republicans do you think should be serving on the committee ?
 
How can a subpoena be illegal ?
How is this one illegal ?



Which Republicans do you think should be serving on the committee ?
Which ever ones House minority leader McCarthy picks. That's the way its done to achieve some level of fairness. But that's not on the Marxist Democrat agenda.

Oh wait, you are trying to gete to nominate Banks and Jordan, sharp as marble you are. If they were on the committee it might not have turned into the KGB style partisan show trial it has become.
 
Which ever ones House minority leader McCarthy picks. That's the way its done to achieve some level of fairness. But that's not on the Marxist Democrat agenda.

Oh wait, you are trying to gete to nominate Banks and Jordan, sharp as marble you are. If they were on the committee it might not have turned into the KGB style partisan show trial it has become.
Those two have no interest in finding the truth. Failed mandated reporter jordan can't even remember his conversations with djt that day.
 
No interest in the truth? Nancy Pelosi who turned down multiple requests by Capitol police to increase security hand picked the select committee members. She has a clear conflict of interest but she is not worried, she won't be summoned to testify.
What is a "failed mandated reporter"?
 
Jim Jordan will not be disqualified from the ballot. Just more distractions from the democrats who are in full crazy mode due to the coming mid term elections.
31 democrats are retiring from congress so far.
 
It's not a question whether or not Rep Jordan has been seditious towards our US Government but what legal/legit actions are now needed to seal the deal based on his alleged violation(s) and the 14th Amendment?



View attachment 67375860
Hometown Stations (WLIO) in Lima, Ohio, reported on Saturday that Democratic demonstrators gathered outside Jordan's office and demanded he be removed from the ballot over his actions related to January 6. They argued that Ohio's Secretary of State Frank LaRose, a Republican, can remove the GOP congressman from the ballot—citing the 14th Amendment, Section 3.

"Frank LaRose can disqualify him from being on the ballot," Taft Mangas, an organizer of the anti-Jordan rally, told the local news channel. "He needs to take a look at this and do what is right and make sure that the people that are running for office are actually qualified to run for office. That they are legitimately allowed to run for office."




The 14th Amendment, Section 3 states:

"No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any State, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any State legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any State, to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof."
Who's been convicted of insurrection? Furthermore can show a direct tie of Jordan aiding anyone who has been so convicted?
 
Who's been convicted of insurrection? Furthermore can show a direct tie of Jordan aiding anyone who has been so convicted?
One might say that's the duty of the 1/6 Committee now in progress.
 
One might say that's the duty of the 1/6 Committee now in progress.
Their duty seems to be slime as many republicans they can to try and affect the mid term elections. But so far they are not moving the needle. Democrats are running for the exit with 31 retiring at last count.
Everyone know the committee is partisan and biased.
 
Which ever ones House minority leader McCarthy picks. That's the way its done to achieve some level of fairness. But that's not on the Marxist Democrat agenda.

Oh wait, you are trying to gete to nominate Banks and Jordan, sharp as marble you are. If they were on the committee it might not have turned into the KGB style partisan show trial it has become.

And those Republicans would agree to serve ?
Do you have any evidence of the Speaker of the House Pelosi, blocking any Marxist Republicans from sitting on the committee ?

Or is it just the case that only Liz Cheney and Adam Kinzinger are the only two Republicans who agreed to serve on it - and the Republican National Committee actually censured them for their participation ?

The Marxist Republicans cant have their cake and eat it
You can't refuse to sit on the committee (and censure those that do) and then in the next breath, whine about unfair representation

Republicans are such hypocrites !
 
And those Republicans would agree to serve ?
Do you have any evidence of the Speaker of the House Pelosi, blocking any Marxist Republicans from sitting on the committee ?

Or is it just the case that only Liz Cheney and Adam Kinzinger are the only two Republicans who agreed to serve on it - and the Republican National Committee actually censured them for their participation ?

The Marxist Republicans cant have their cake and eat it
You can't refuse to sit on the committee (and censure those that do) and then in the next breath, whine about unfair representation

Republicans are such hypocrites !
Nancy Pelosi extended an invitation to the minority leader to appoint a quantity of Republican Congress people to the committee. I believe it was 3.

McCarthy appointed Banks, Jordan and one other member to the committee. Pelosi dismissed Banks and Jordan out of partisan hubris. The remaining Republican appointee then resigned in protest of Pelosi's abuse.

The true story is readily available with a simple search. Try doing one before you embarrass yourself futher.
 
Nancy Pelosi extended an invitation to the minority leader to appoint a quantity of Republican Congress people to the committee. I believe it was 3.

McCarthy appointed Banks, Jordan and one other member to the committee. Pelosi dismissed Banks and Jordan out of partisan hubris. The remaining Republican appointee then resigned in protest of Pelosi's abuse.

The true story is readily available with a simple search. Try doing one before you embarrass yourself futher.

So how come those that ***DO*** serve get censured ?
 
Back
Top Bottom