No, I dont agree with anything you say unless you can back it up with facts, instead of guesstimations
And a rise in employment in state govt jobs has nothing to do with either bubble or Clinton
Ok, what's your number on this. And show us what you back it up with.
You're the one making the claim. Back it up instead of wasting your time fishing for something to disagree with
My claim is that most Clinton jobs are BS. I provided a citation and estimations for factors that you agreed were important. I also subtracted the government jobs. My data and methods are transparent. You, on the other hand, are making various claims with absolutely nothing to back them.
I don't remember agreeing to any of your delusional claims, and your methods are crap
That you continue to refuse to give a number is laughably toolish and displays your level of ignorance yet devotion.
That you continue to support delusional claims that you can't back up is laughaby foolish. That I choose not to do the same is wise.
You say that “The Clinton tax increases weren't large enough to have some magical massive impact on the entire economy “Better tell that to Newt, he thought differently in 1993, when he said,“ The tax increase will kill jobs and lead to a recession, and the recession will force people out of work and onto unemployment, and actually increase the deficit.“ Actually during Clinton's second term unemployment dropped from about 5% to about 4%, where’s his first term it dropped from 7.33 to 5%.
Notice where the tax cuts are on this BLS graph? The Dot Com bubble was the years of 1997 – 2000.Check out the graph and tell me how a bubble that stetted in 1997 would have an effect on the Clinton boom. I only see about a 1% kick in the employment rate. Maybe a bit more.
By whom? Also, when exactly did this bubble burst in regards to employment? You're overstating the effects of the dot com "bubble Burst" on the actual labor market by a criminal margin.Clinton's presidency, economically, is defined by the greatest bubble to ever rupture in cosmic history (and the feel-good BS that went along with such).
I read an article about the deficit/budget and I couldn't help but remember this thread...
Capitol Alert: California tax revenue beats projections, Chiang says
I'm going to indulge myself and just say, I told you so.
I read an article about the deficit/budget and I couldn't help but remember this thread...
Capitol Alert: California tax revenue beats projections, Chiang says
I'm going to indulge myself and just say, I told you so.
Just giving the nay Sayers a bite outta the apple repeter.
"The state collected about $1.2 billion more in tax revenue last month than Gov. Jerry Brown projected, ending the fiscal year about $2 billion ahead of expectations, the state controller reported today."
Knowing some wont have the heart to go take a peek at the GOOD NEWS.:mrgreen:
I can already hear them, "oh no, the state was responsible and payed off $7.2 billion of its deficit. Not another fact that challenges our ideology and dogma!"
From the article:
"That's the context of this budget, to fix the long-standing problem. We have fixed it. We're on the road to sustainable balance. It will not be easy - there will be some disagreements, there will be some heartburn," Brown said.
He vowed to be conservative with spending "instead of just enjoying the momentary high and then having the hangover many years later."
Is he the one who decides about spending? I thought that was the overwhelmingly Democratic legislature who did that.
Is he the one who decides about spending? I thought that was the overwhelmingly Democratic legislature who did that.
Yes, it is. I believe that is why the state was in trouble to begin with.
Well California's surplus sure didn't last long. They just spent it all giving the state employees a pay raise.
Actually I believe there was a law put in place in Cali that said there needs to be a supermajority to raise taxes. So revenues basically couldn't increase no matter the policies that they did decide to enact... creating the massive deficit.
Just giving the nay Sayers a bite outta the apple repeter.
"The state collected about $1.2 billion more in tax revenue last month than Gov. Jerry Brown projected, ending the fiscal year about $2 billion ahead of expectations, the state controller reported today."
Knowing some wont have the heart to go take a peek at the GOOD NEWS.:mrgreen:
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?