- Joined
- Jan 28, 2013
- Messages
- 94,823
- Reaction score
- 28,343
- Location
- Williamsburg, Virginia
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Independent
The new Labour leader looks to be a probable electoral disaster for his party, and that's good for us because he is an enemy of the U.S.
The Threat of Jeremy Corbyn's Anti-American Agenda - Washington Post
"SOME IN the United States see Jeremy Corbyn, the newly elected leader of Britain’s Labour Party, as an analogue of Bernie Sanders, the surging socialist in the Democratic presidential primary. Mr. Sanders himself said he was “delighted” by Mr. Corbyn’s win. Yet what the Guardian newspaper called “the most astonishing leadership victory in any major British political party in modern times” was not merely a blow against “mass income and wealth inequality,” as Mr. Sanders described it. It also validated a radically anti-American agenda that could accentuate Britain’s drift away from the trans-Atlantic partnership.
Mr. Corbyn espouses a foreign policy whose guiding principle is to oppose the United States and Israel by all means. It has led him to label as “friends” such disparate political forces as Hamas, Hezbollah and the populist government of Venezuela and to accept funding from organizations designated by the U.S. government as terrorist groups. Mr. Corbyn endorsed the Iraqi insurgents who fought U.S. troops and equated the Islamic State’s overrunning of Iraqi cities with the 2004 U.S. offensive in Fallujah. He said that Washington, rather than Moscow, is to blame for the civil war in Ukraine. In an interview with Iran’s state television channel, he called the U.S. raid that killed Osama bin Laden a “tragedy.”
. . . . "
The new Labour leader looks to be a probable electoral disaster for his party, and that's good for us because he is an enemy of the U.S.
The Threat of Jeremy Corbyn's Anti-American Agenda - Washington Post
"SOME IN the United States see Jeremy Corbyn, the newly elected leader of Britain’s Labour Party, as an analogue of Bernie Sanders, the surging socialist in the Democratic presidential primary. Mr. Sanders himself said he was “delighted” by Mr. Corbyn’s win. Yet what the Guardian newspaper called “the most astonishing leadership victory in any major British political party in modern times” was not merely a blow against “mass income and wealth inequality,” as Mr. Sanders described it. It also validated a radically anti-American agenda that could accentuate Britain’s drift away from the trans-Atlantic partnership.
Mr. Corbyn espouses a foreign policy whose guiding principle is to oppose the United States and Israel by all means. It has led him to label as “friends” such disparate political forces as Hamas, Hezbollah and the populist government of Venezuela and to accept funding from organizations designated by the U.S. government as terrorist groups. Mr. Corbyn endorsed the Iraqi insurgents who fought U.S. troops and equated the Islamic State’s overrunning of Iraqi cities with the 2004 U.S. offensive in Fallujah. He said that Washington, rather than Moscow, is to blame for the civil war in Ukraine. In an interview with Iran’s state television channel, he called the U.S. raid that killed Osama bin Laden a “tragedy.”
. . . . "
A load of untruths, misrepresentation and quotes taken out of context.
For example, What he actually said about Bin Laden's death was this:
"There was no attempt to arrest him or put him on trial and is yet another tragedy, upon a tragedy, upon a tragedy.
The world trade centre was a tragedy, the attack on Afghanistan was a tragedy, the war in Iraq was a tragedy. Tens of thousands of people have died. Can't we learn some lessons from this?"
The Hamas friends thing was just diplomatic talk. He used the word "friends" in a "collective way" at a meeting in parliament. "I'm saying that people I talk to, I use it in a collective way, saying our friends are prepared to talk.
"Does it mean I agree with Hamas and what it does? No. Does it mean I agree with Hezbollah and what they do? No. What it means is that I think to bring about a peace process, you have to talk to people with whom you may profoundly disagree.
"There is not going to be a peace process unless there is talks involving Israel, Hezbollah and Hamas and I think everyone knows that."
A load of untruths, misrepresentation and quotes taken out of context.
For example, What he actually said about Bin Laden's death was this:
"There was no attempt to arrest him or put him on trial and is yet another tragedy, upon a tragedy, upon a tragedy.
The world trade centre was a tragedy, the attack on Afghanistan was a tragedy, the war in Iraq was a tragedy. Tens of thousands of people have died. Can't we learn some lessons from this?"
The Hamas friends thing was just diplomatic talk. He used the word "friends" in a "collective way" at a meeting in parliament. "I'm saying that people I talk to, I use it in a collective way, saying our friends are prepared to talk.
"Does it mean I agree with Hamas and what it does? No. Does it mean I agree with Hezbollah and what they do? No. What it means is that I think to bring about a peace process, you have to talk to people with whom you may profoundly disagree.
"There is not going to be a peace process unless there is talks involving Israel, Hezbollah and Hamas and I think everyone knows that."
A load of untruths, misrepresentation and quotes taken out of context.
For example, What he actually said about Bin Laden's death was this:
"There was no attempt to arrest him or put him on trial and is yet another tragedy, upon a tragedy, upon a tragedy.
The world trade centre was a tragedy, the attack on Afghanistan was a tragedy, the war in Iraq was a tragedy. Tens of thousands of people have died. Can't we learn some lessons from this?"
The Hamas friends thing was just diplomatic talk. He used the word "friends" in a "collective way" at a meeting in parliament. "I'm saying that people I talk to, I use it in a collective way, saying our friends are prepared to talk.
"Does it mean I agree with Hamas and what it does? No. Does it mean I agree with Hezbollah and what they do? No. What it means is that I think to bring about a peace process, you have to talk to people with whom you may profoundly disagree.
"There is not going to be a peace process unless there is talks involving Israel, Hezbollah and Hamas and I think everyone knows that."
You've literally just said; "It's not true that he had called bin-Laden's killing a 'tragedy' and Hamas and Hezbollah his 'friends', because he had also called 9/11 a tragedy and said he 'doesn't agree with Hezbollah and Hamas'". If you were trying to make a point, you really haven't.
No matter how you're going to put it, the man is an insane radical who identifies with terrorists and is a very convincing example of how the far-left agenda is walking hand in hand with radical Islam as claimed by many of its opposers frequently.
You've literally just said; "It's not true that he had called bin-Laden's killing a 'tragedy' and Hamas and Hezbollah his 'friends', because he had also called 9/11 a tragedy and said he 'doesn't agree with Hezbollah and Hamas'". If you were trying to make a point, you really haven't.
No matter how you're going to put it, the man is an insane radical who identifies with terrorists and is a very convincing example of how the far-left agenda is walking hand in hand with radical Islam as claimed by many of its opposers frequently.
It's like watching religious zealots some times, the degree of the true believer syndrome being so severe among a sizable portion of the left. A pity, that, since the left used to be more or less defined by liberalism instead of all this dogmatic double talk. I suppose if people do not act according to anything even remotely resembling principles they do not see the patent hypocrisy of their attitudes, but pretending something isn't what it is strikes me as downright delusional.
Corbyn has visited Gaza to work with Hamas, what, about eight or ten times by now? It would be as if some extreme right winger were defending a fellow who meets regularly with the kkk and goes out with them on some cross-burning expeditions by claiming the fellow didn't actually light the torch so it's really all okey dokey.
Well Cameron was wanting to give ISIS weapons back in 2013, so let's not get all high horsey shall we? And let's not forget Dubya's best friends, the Saudi government.
No, I said it was taken out of context. What he thought was the tragedy was Bin Laden not being tried for his crimes.
How is he walking hand in hand with terrorists when he has said he doesn't agree with Hamas or Hezbollah and 9/11 was a tragedy.
The guy is a pacifist. When you are trying to get two sides to talk to each other, you don't go around insulting them. It's called diplomatic language.
A load of untruths, misrepresentation and quotes taken out of context.
For example, What he actually said about Bin Laden's death was this:
"There was no attempt to arrest him or put him on trial and is yet another tragedy, upon a tragedy, upon a tragedy.
The world trade centre was a tragedy, the attack on Afghanistan was a tragedy, the war in Iraq was a tragedy. Tens of thousands of people have died. Can't we learn some lessons from this?"
The Hamas friends thing was just diplomatic talk. He used the word "friends" in a "collective way" at a meeting in parliament. "I'm saying that people I talk to, I use it in a collective way, saying our friends are prepared to talk.
"Does it mean I agree with Hamas and what it does? No. Does it mean I agree with Hezbollah and what they do? No. What it means is that I think to bring about a peace process, you have to talk to people with whom you may profoundly disagree.
"There is not going to be a peace process unless there is talks involving Israel, Hezbollah and Hamas and I think everyone knows that."
A load of untruths, misrepresentation and quotes taken out of context.
For example, What he actually said about Bin Laden's death was this:
"There was no attempt to arrest him or put him on trial and is yet another tragedy, upon a tragedy, upon a tragedy.
The world trade centre was a tragedy, the attack on Afghanistan was a tragedy, the war in Iraq was a tragedy. Tens of thousands of people have died. Can't we learn some lessons from this?"
The Hamas friends thing was just diplomatic talk. He used the word "friends" in a "collective way" at a meeting in parliament. "I'm saying that people I talk to, I use it in a collective way, saying our friends are prepared to talk.
"Does it mean I agree with Hamas and what it does? No. Does it mean I agree with Hezbollah and what they do? No. What it means is that I think to bring about a peace process, you have to talk to people with whom you may profoundly disagree.
"There is not going to be a peace process unless there is talks involving Israel, Hezbollah and Hamas and I think everyone knows that."
From a link in the OP article:
Mr Corbyn, The Telegraph can reveal, has taken thousands of pounds in gifts from organisations closely linked to the terror group Hamas, whose operatives he once described as “friends”.
What is an anti-American agenda? If a country opposes our foreign policy, it doesn't make them anti-American.
This will come back to bite him if he ever wishes to run for PM.
From a link in the OP article:
Mr Corbyn, The Telegraph can reveal, has taken thousands of pounds in gifts from organisations closely linked to the terror group Hamas, whose operatives he once described as “friends”.
What is an anti-American agenda? If a country opposes our foreign policy, it doesn't make them anti-American.
.
Taking the Telegraph's word on anything relating to the Labour Party is like believing Russia Today's coverage of Ukraine. It's the mouthpiece of the enemy. You do know it's known as the Torygraph, don't you?
Yes, I suppose quoting Mr. Corbyn is definitely unfair.:roll:
It is if you don't bother to quote him correctly and in context. Wasn't it the Telegraph that invented the report that Corbyn had proposed disbanding the armed forces? Yes, I think it was.
It is if you don't bother to quote him correctly and in context. Wasn't it the Telegraph that invented the report that Corbyn had proposed disbanding the armed forces? Yes, I think it was.
I suppose you have a link to support your claim.
Here's what Jeremy Corbyn REALLY said about getting rid of the Army - Mirror OnlineInstead of saying only Britain should scrap its defences, he said it would be 'wonderful' if every country in the world stood down its arms.
Sure, here's what Corbyn really said.
Here's what Jeremy Corbyn REALLY said about getting rid of the Army - Mirror Online
Tim Stanley of the Telegraph accused him of wanting to disband the armed forces on BBC1's Question Time programme last night. I'd post the link to the programme (in fact, here it is) but you won't be able to watch it unless you're in the UK, or you have a clever proxy.
Here's another right-wing rag pushing the same lie, knowing it to be untrue.
- The anti manThe Economist - 33 mins ago
Mr Corbyn has supported anti-American leaders like Venezuela's late president, Hugo Chávez. He has suggested that Britain should share ...- Backwards, comrades!The Economist - 2 hours ago
You'll be linking us to Fox News and the WSJ next. Yeah, we know, right-wingers don't like him.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?