• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Jeffrey Epstein victim’s diary ‘contradicts’ FBI blackmail claims

I dont know what she had. But if she DID have a client list, then Biden FBI had it all along and kept it secret.

Whatever the circumstances, I don't think it's beyond the pale to compel her to testify under oath before Congress on the matter - do you?

Same goes for Christopher Wray.

Since there is no ongoing investigation into the matter, their testifying now obviously wouldn't be prejudicial.
 
I dont know what she had.
Cop out answer, typical. Either she lied about having it or she's lying about it not existing, either way she is a liar. Do you acknowledge this?
But if she DID have a client list, then Biden FBI had it all along and kept it secret.
And Trump has it right now.

We all know the real reason Trump hasn't released it: he's on the list.
 
But Biden isn’t going to save you from supporting what you are supporting.
Im not supporting anything :rolleyes:
What it shows, is the level of influence the powerful people had to withhold the disclosure and ultimately the ability to have the evidence destroyed, which is so obviously what happened here, as obvious as the murder of Epstein himself.

It’s obvious.

And guess what?

His murder and the destruction of the list, both happened on Trumps watch.

And it’s something you support by extension.
You have no evidence that a list even existed and less evidence that Trump destroyed it. Instead of constantly posting TDS fueled lies, make an honest argument
 
Whatever the circumstances, I don't think it's beyond the pale to compel her to testify under oath before Congress on the matter - do you?

Same goes for Christopher Wray.

Since there is no ongoing investigation into the matter, their testifying now obviously wouldn't be prejudicial.
Fine by me. Bring them all up. Wray would know if there was a list and who was on it. Bring him in and ask him. Then ask him why no one was ever charged or prosecuted for anything
 
Im not supporting anything :rolleyes:

You have no evidence that a list even existed and less evidence that Trump destroyed it. Instead of constantly posting TDS fueled lies, make an honest argument

You wouldn’t know honesty if it came up and but you in the ass.
 
Cop out answer, typical. Either she lied about having it or she's lying about it not existing, either way she is a liar. Do you acknowledge this?
I dont know what she had and neither do you
And Trump has it right now.

We all know the real reason Trump hasn't released it: he's on the list.
We dont know that. You believe that because you hate Trump, not because you have any actual evidence.
 
Fine by me. Bring them all up. Wray would know if there was a list and who was on it. Bring him in and ask him. Then ask him why no one was ever charged or prosecuted for anything

I don't know if the matter was being investigated by the Biden FBI for not. If it was, then it's perfectly reasonable that they wouldn't have released any information to that effect until they felt confident enough to seek indictment - big fish and little fish alike. It's pretty obvious that "something" on the matter was on Bondi's desk in February. If that didn't include an "Epstein List"; then there was certainly some other body of information. So - since the matter is a dead-letter now - let her testify on the information she did possess.
 
I dont know what she had and neither do you
She had it or she didn't. Those two options encompass all possibilities.

Either option means she lied. Thank you for proving me right in my belief that you were never going to acknowledge this. I just wanted to make sure everyone saw it.
We dont know that. You believe that because you hate Trump, not because you have any actual evidence.
Everyone knows that. Even you.
 
That may or may not be true, but if the Biden administration had evidence that Trump was involved with Epstein, it would have leaked out. 100%
I disagree. Again, too much risk that if Trump was outed, so would others. Best to keep everything quiet.
 
Lol, he'll get right on it, Sloppy Steve.

 
She had it or she didn't. Those two options encompass all possibilities.

Either option means she lied. Thank you for proving me right in my belief that you were never going to acknowledge this. I just wanted to make sure everyone saw it.
I dont know what she had and neither do you.
Everyone knows that. Even you.
You dont know shit.
 
I disagree. Again, too much risk that if Trump was outed, so would others. Best to keep everything quiet.
If Trump is on the list and Bidens team chose to lose the election rather than out him, all that means is whatever is in there is way, way worse for democrats.
 
If Trump is on the list and Bidens team chose to lose the election rather than out him, all that means is whatever is in there is way, way worse for democrats.
They were bosom buddies for more than a decade, besties
Epstein even used Trumps resort for sex trafficking.

The list is on my desk and is being reviewed

There is no list.
 
If Trump is on the list and Bidens team chose to lose the election rather than out him, all that means is whatever is in there is way, way worse for democrats.

No... it means justice matters more than politics. The White House had - and has - no business snooping into FBI investigations, especially where there are political ramifications involved.

Seriously, though, even if there is a list and Trump's name is on it - is anyone going to be truly shocked? By this point, I don't think it will matter worth a damn - his supporters will keep on supporting him, and the people who oppose him aren't going to change their opposition. That's just where we are as a nation nowadays.
 
No... it means justice matters more than politics. The White House had - and has - no business snooping into FBI investigations, especially where there are political ramifications involved.
Lol. How naive
 
Lol. How naive

It's not. Such a situation is rife with unintended consequences. Trying to make political hay out of FBI investigations has just as much chance of blowing up in your own face as it does of hurting the opposition.

Why do you think LBJ didn't expose Nixon's effort to sabotage the Paris Peace Talks during the '68 campaign?
 
If Trump is on the list and Bidens team chose to lose the election rather than out him, all that means is whatever is in there is way, way worse for democrats.
Who knows? Dersh claims to:



1752180703731.webp
 
Ghislane Maxwell is in prison for trafficking thousands of victims... to nobody, I guess.
For a man named Jeffery Epstein...
She provided the list of everyone she trafficked for, and it was proven in court, which is why she is in prison.
 
Who knows? Dersh claims to:



View attachment 67579171

It's wild how many people know the names, and how many people have copies of the documents, but just won't share them...

But yet all the documents that have been shared show the same story...
 
I think there’s just the one name on the list that keeps it sealed under this administration.
 
And what name kept it sealed under the last administration?
But Trump ran on, and you voted for him in part, because he was going to not be previous admins and release the files. Kash Patel and bongbong’s comments leading up to getting their jobs fueled that believe even more among maga. So Sleepy Joe the Pedo had every reason to hid the Epstein Files to protect Hunter and Hillary and Chelsea, who are all in them (obv). The outlier here is the behavior by the Child Protectors and Their Leader now that it’s the official position of Donald Trump that there is no Epstein Files.

You tell everyone to vote for Trump cause he’s not like the rest, and then when he’s like the rest you demand to know why everyone believed he wasn’t like the rest.
 
Back
Top Bottom