Side-topic, but have you a source in mind for this claim? I don't necessarily dispute it, but I haven't heard it before.FDR wanted the Democrat Party to be a Progressive party and tried to purge Conservatives from its ranks. He wanted the two parties to offer the American people a stark ideological choice. Well, his dream has now been realized, and it’s a nightmare. It’s funny how each party believes that THEY are not extreme but it’s the OTHER side who’s extreme. The reality is that they’re both extreme but too delusional to realize it, kinda like how the villain in the movie never believes he’s the villain but is actually the good guy.
Mark
Mad Libs didn't think it was stupid when Trump claimed that he could automatically declassify documents by Presidential fiat. They demanded in-advance documentation, though I have not seen that requirement in writing. If Mad Libs think one Presidential action is dicey when not backed up by documents, why not all such actions?What record do you think there needs to be? Biden, an old man with an infirm hand, declares a pile of paper meets his approval for signature and says, "Sign these!". Period. End of story. Why would he sign a document commanding that documents be signed? How stupid is that?
Until comment 286 I have NEVER seen you or any Rightie on here refer to anyone else as "dung". Now you are doing it to cover up for posting a racist trope. Kamaltoe, or Kamaldung, same thing, we recognize the trope. You can dance all you want, and you can plead your innocence for 99 more posts, but I have only ever heard expressions like those used by racists and against people of color.Well, by extension I'm also calling all the Bidungs "dung-names," not just Rapey Joe, and not even a Mad Lib could doubt that Jill Bidung is a white female politician, since she and her cohorts took control of the country while their puppet was incapacitated.
Keep feeding me those Mad Lib straight lines; it's loads o' fun.
BULLSHIT! These two events cannot be conflated, and you know it. Trump's claim was not only long after the fact, long after he had already left office, but in direct violation of a court order to produce those documents. What's your excuse for his efforts to hide them from the law after he knew they were sought? Your analogy isn't even apples and oranges, it's weather balloons and Osage oranges. One of them flies while the other one just rots on the ground. Guess which is which.Mad Libs didn't think it was stupid when Trump claimed that he could automatically declassify documents by Presidential fiat.
How do you live with yourself?They demanded in-advance documentation, though I have not seen that requirement in writing. If Mad Libs think one Presidential action is dicey when not backed up by documents, why not all such actions?
Even if I had not worked the Bidungs into the mix, it still would not matter that I made a pun on Cameldung's name, because a pun is all it ever was. You want to believe that it's OK to pun on the names of your enemies-- I'm sure you'd never object to the failed attempt of some Lib to rename Trump as "Drumpf"-- which I have seen here from some unoriginal posters. But you're married to the idea that no one can pun on a multiracial's name, even if the pun has nothing to do with their race. "Kamala" sounds like "camel," and the correlation arises from the fact that she never let anything but dung come out of her mouth. Drivel on about "racism," all you like, but the Libs' policy of racial hoaxing has been fully exposed and you have zero credibility.Until comment 286 I have NEVER seen you or any Rightie on here refer to anyone else as "dung". Now you are doing it to cover up for posting a racist trope. Kamaltoe, or Kamaldung, same thing, we recognize the trope. You can dance all you want, and you can plead your innocence for 99 more posts, but I have only ever heard expressions like those used by racists and against people of color.
There's still no written specification as to the exact process a President must use to declassify documents, and this compares to the argument that BIdung could just go ahead and allow his aides to employ the autopen. What's rotting are all Lib arguments made to give the Bidung regime a pass on all of their dickery. I will admit that the autopen attack by the Cons probably is one of the weaker Con strategies, but the "advance pardon" for people like Hunter and Fauci is so horribly corrupt that any attack is morally justified.BULLSHIT! These two events cannot be conflated, and you know it. Trump's claim was not only long after the fact, long after he had already left office, but in direct violation of a court order to produce those documents. What's your excuse for his efforts to hide them from the law after he knew they were sought? Your analogy isn't even apples and oranges, it's weather balloons and Osage oranges. One of them flies while the other one just rots on the ground. Guess which is which.
How do you live with yourself?
Methinks thou dost protest too much.Even if I had not worked the Bidungs into the mix, it still would not matter that I made a pun on Cameldung's name, because a pun is all it ever was. You want to believe that it's OK to pun on the names of your enemies-- I'm sure you'd never object to the failed attempt of some Lib to rename Trump as "Drumpf"-- which I have seen here from some unoriginal posters. But you're married to the idea that no one can pun on a multiracial's name, even if the pun has nothing to do with their race. "Kamala" sounds like "camel," and the correlation arises from the fact that she never let anything but dung come out of her mouth. Drivel on about "racism," all you like, but the Libs' policy of racial hoaxing has been fully exposed and you have zero credibility.
FYI, Trump's original family name was Drumpf before his family changed it. I often default to using it as in "Kaiser Drumpf", because just like so many from Project 2025's Heritage Foundation, I'm an "Originalist".Even if I had not worked the Bidungs into the mix, it still would not matter that I made a pun on Cameldung's name, because a pun is all it ever was. You want to believe that it's OK to pun on the names of your enemies-- I'm sure you'd never object to the failed attempt of some Lib to rename Trump as "Drumpf"-- which I have seen here from some unoriginal posters. But you're married to the idea that no one can pun on a multiracial's name, even if the pun has nothing to do with their race. "Kamala" sounds like "camel," and the correlation arises from the fact that she never let anything but dung come out of her mouth. Drivel on about "racism," all you like, but the Libs' policy of racial hoaxing has been fully exposed and you have zero credibility.
I'll go way out on a limb here and say that for a President to declassify documents, it has to be done WHILE HE'S STILL PRESIDENT !!!There's still no written specification as to the exact process a President must use to declassify documents,
Assumes facts not in evidence.and this compares to the argument that BIdung could just go ahead and allow his aides to employ the autopen.
^^^ Mostly bullshit. ^^^What's rotting are all Lib arguments made to give the Bidung regime a pass on all of their dickery. I will admit that the autopen attack by the Cons probably is one of the weaker Con strategies, but the "advance pardon" for people like Hunter and Fauci is so horribly corrupt that any attack is morally justified.
The meaning of what. the phrase "protest too much?" In the bard's play the correct context is that Queen Gertrude is responding to the play her son Hamlet set up to "catch the conscience of the king." She says that the play's grieving wife is "protesting"-- which in the right context means "declaiming"-- her grief too loudly to be believable. Sort of like alleged "anti-racists" constantly declaiming that racism is everywhere, thus justifying their empty rhetoric and hollow virtue signaling.Methinks thou dost protest too much.
Look up the meaning.
But Mad Libs didn't bring up the original family name because they cared about accuracy. They did so because the original name sounded like English "dumb," which also could've played into the family's reason for changing it. Libs wanted to take advantage of an accidental sound-alike pun, and that's fine with me. Their act of commission, which no Lib, mad or otherwise, ever protests, justifies any and all puns used against Lib politicians.FYI, Trump's original family name was Drumpf before his family changed it. I often default to using it as in "Kaiser Drumpf", because just like so many from Project 2025's Heritage Foundation, I'm an "Originalist".
Wanting to shun the family's German roots was cowardly.
Feel free to cite the specific rule that states that priority.I'll go way out on a limb here and say that for a President to declassify documents, it has to be done WHILE HE'S STILL PRESIDENT !!!
Assumes facts not in evidence.
^^^ Mostly bullshit. ^^^
NO - you are WRONG! They changed their name because they wanted to publicly separate themselves from their German identity, and thus avoid anti-German sentiment in this country.But Mad Libs didn't bring up the original family name because they cared about accuracy. They did so because the original name sounded like English "dumb," which also could've played into the family's reason for changing it. Libs wanted to take advantage of an accidental sound-alike pun, and that's fine with me. Their act of commission, which no Lib, mad or otherwise, ever protests, justifies any and all puns used against Lib politicians.
Changing the subject fails to buttress your argument about the name Drumpf. One has nothing to do with the other.Feel free to cite the specific rule that states that priority.
Nothing's greater bullshit than the Dems' endorsement of elder abuse for the sake of political advancement.
Oooh, look! A video!!Biden was never mentally compromised
c'mon man
I'm not talking about the Trump Family's motives for changing their name. I'm stating that I don't believe any Mad Libs brought up the original name for any reason but because the name sounds like English "dumb."NO - you are WRONG! They changed their name because they wanted to publicly separate themselves from their German identity, and thus avoid anti-German sentiment in this country.
Since you weren't following my argument about the reason Mad Libs brought up a name no longer being used, I threw in a side topic. You don't have to address it if you don't want to. I wasn't really expecting an answer anyway.Changing the subject fails to buttress your argument about the name Drumpf. One has nothing to do with the other.
Did you read and understand what SKyChief posted?If there is no crime, what is the point?
Now, everyone pay attention to the Biden Crime Family and make sure NO ONE ever votes for Biden again.
Probably no more accountability than for the guy who tried to overturn a free and fair election.
None of the answers on the poll are good. I don't think anyone will be held accountable.
But funny how Democrats (and their media) spend four years outright lying to us about Biden, but somehow the issue is that it a "Republican stunt".
You think you're smart because you figured out that both sides play dirty? Congratulations.and that matters how?
the Red and Blue teams both work for the same Corrupt dee cee handlers, so it all becomes a 'stunt' if you will.
have we figured this out yet, or we still into Dialectical thinking ??
never mind, i know the answers all ready.
Right wingers are fine covering up Trump's cognitive decline.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?