• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

'It's a Killing Field': IDF Soldiers Ordered to Shoot Deliberately at Unarmed Gazans Waiting for Humanitarian Aid

According to a News junkie who is she loves up the lies you're told.

I've seen what you support so you're ridicule means nothing.

Yeah it seems like bullshit

Yeah tend to be a big stickler for the truth it's not an insult to tell me that I'm hung up on reality it's a compliment and thank you.
Is there even a point to you going into threads and just denying stuff and telling people you don’t believe them? I’ve seen you do it in multiple threads now and you’re not going to accomplish anything with that sort of behavior.
 
Is there even a point to you going into threads and just denying stuff and telling people you don’t believe them? I’ve seen you do it in multiple threads now and you’re not going to accomplish anything with that sort of behavior.

Dumb trolling for attention. More fool us for giving it to him.
 
Hell no.

What makes them credible?

What makes Reuters credible??


Reuters - Least Biased - Not Left - Not Right - Credible



LEAST BIASED​

These sources have minimal bias and use very few loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using appeal to emotion or stereotypes). The reporting is factual and usually sourced. These are the most credible media sources.

  • Overall, we rate Reuters Least Biased based on objective reporting and Very High for factual reporting due to proper sourcing of information with minimal bias and a clean fact check record.
 
What makes Reuters credible??


Reuters - Least Biased - Not Left - Not Right - Credible



LEAST BIASED​

These sources have minimal bias and use very few loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using appeal to emotion or stereotypes). The reporting is factual and usually sourced. These are the most credible media sources.

  • Overall, we rate Reuters Least Biased based on objective reporting and Very High for factual reporting due to proper sourcing of information with minimal bias and a clean fact check record.
Oh yes The credibility checker probably owned by a news corporation and let us know if you think you're credible.
 
Can you post any links to an alternative take on what is happening then so that you can educate me?
I'm questioning whether or not this is happening. Can you show that it is more than just pinning articles from blog sites.
Doesn't have to be your favourite - just the ones that helps inform your opinion.
Unskeptical that is probably the best thing to inform your opinion.
 
Oh yes The credibility checker probably owned by a news corporation and let us know if you think you're credible.

Err... it's not owned by a news corporation. It's independent.

I mean if you're not prepared to accept Reuters as a credible news source, then you're basically not prepared to accept any news source.
 
Last edited:
They're starting to siege the West Bank also. The colonizer accusations are getting harder to avoid by the day.
As if it was ever in doubt for anyone except Zionist colonisers. "Between the Sea and the Jordan there will only be Israeli sovereignty". Likud Party Charter, 1977. And guess who leads Likud?

 
So the headline is accurate but it is already shown to be not accurate by the very first line in the article.

It’s hilarious just how Ignorant you are in this r topic.
You'll probably also deny Israel's routine use of Palestinian civilians, including children, as human shields, in contravention of a 2005 Israeli High Court ruling that the practise cease. I'll also remind you that the use of human shields is a war crime (the IDF appealed the ruling, and lost).
You're defending a pariah state which has violated every tenet of international law, the laws of occupation, international humanitarian law, and both the Hague and Geneva conventions since its inception in 1948. These are undeniable, documented facts. I'm curious as to why anyone in their right mind would seek to defend such a criminal regime.
 
When the story smells like bullshit it probably is and I'll use that metric from now on this story smells like bullshit.

You know I'm not going to read bullshit articles some complete lawyer writing a story is not evidence of anything.
Well, at least you're honest about your ignorance.
 
I already demonstrated their dishonesty between what their headline said and what the actual article is about.
I get that you are fine with being lie to as long as they are telling you what you want yo hear but not everyone feels that way.
Now that you may have finished a nitpick sealioning, or not, the subject is desperate, starving civilians murdered in light of day by heavily armed, well fed soldiers.
 
Yeah, and the 15 people, including medics that were killed and buried in a mass grave weren't in vehicles that had their headlights or emergency signals on either, according to IDF.

Then when their bodies were recovered, video was obtained from the phone of a paramedic who was killed. They did clearly have them on. The IDF lied. They were murdered, buried in a mass grave with their vehicles.

Then the IDF announced they would investigate. Only after their initial account was proven a lie by the video evidence.

If there was no video evidence, no one would have known.
Milosevic died in prison for ordering the same.
 
The article is behind a pay wall. Did you pay to read the whole article?

Other credible news sources, such as Reuters, are using the word ordered when it comes to this story.
Reuters are merely citing the Haaretz (nonsensical) article.

Haaretz, a left-leaning Israeli newspaper, quoted unnamed Israeli soldiers as saying they were told to fire at the crowds to keep them back, using unnecessary lethal force against people who appeared to pose no threat.
The military told Reuters that the Israel Defense Forces had not instructed soldiers to deliberately shoot at civilians. It added that it was looking to improve "the operational response" in the aid areas and had recently installed new fencing and signs, and opened additional routes to reach the handout zones.
Haaretz quoted unnamed sources as saying that the army unit established to review incidents that may involve breaches of international law had been tasked with examining soldiers' actions near aid locations over the past month.

 
Milosevic died in prison for ordering the same.
Sadly before he was sentenced. Oh well. at least we're well rid of that particular war criminal. When do we start on Israel's? How about Netanyahu first, then Smotrich (self-described as a "fascist homophobe"), for openly and publicly advocating genocide against the Palestinian people, then there's his sidekick, Ben Gvir, another odious illegal 'settler' scum, so extreme he was forbidden service with the IDF. These are the fascist scum supporters of Israel don't like hearing about, because it destroys their 'moral outrage' argument about poor, misunderstood and persecuted Israel.


 
Last edited:
They are the same, what is the functional difference between

Headline: IDF soldiers ordered to deliberately shoot at gazans waiting for aid.

The actual quote: Israeli soldiers deliberately fired at gazans near aid stations.

Obviously they're not going to repeat the allegation exactly word for word from the headline in the article. That would be bad writing.
That you don’t understand the difference between being order to do something and individual soldiers doing something that they were not ordered to do shows a rather obvious lack of critical thinking ability.

To pretend to not understand the difference is either completely naivety or just lying because you are trying to push an agenda.
 
That you don’t understand the difference between being order to do something and individual soldiers doing something that they were not ordered to do shows a rather obvious lack of critical thinking ability.

To pretend to not understand the difference is either completely naivety or just lying because you are trying to push an agenda.
Do let us know when and if these kids with lethal weapons ever get to answer for their crimes. Even genuine war crimes committed by the IDF result in nothing more than a demotion and a token telling-off; 'go sit on the naughty step until you're sorry'.
 
Just another reminder that Israel is not the good guys people want us to believe.


Since that is behind a paywall, here is more:


View attachment 67576934



View attachment 67576935

If there is any silver lining to the current genocide in Gaza, it may come in the form of criminal prosecutions for those who profit from war and debt:

https://consortiumnews.com/2025/06/...tent&eId=72a18643-827c-491d-b8c0-25bb46f562f7

"In her forthcoming report, (Francesca) Albanese will detail exactly how Palestine has been exploited by the global capitalist system and will highlight the role certain corporations have played in the genocide:

“[T]here are corporate entities, including from Palestine-friendly states, who have for decades made businesses and made profits out of the economy of the occupation, because Israel has always exploited Palestinian land and resources and Palestinian life. The profits have continued and even increased as the economy of the occupation transformed into an economy of genocide.”
What changes if US prisons begin filling with rich white-collar war criminals from Wall Street and DC?

What doesn't.
 
I think you as just making excuses for a lying source because you like the story they are trying you push.

And you keep proving my point.

When you hold Israel to unrealistic standard and refuse to put the blame on Hamas where it belongs it shows that your real problem is with the Jews.

Ah, so the Israeli Government's deliberate placing - of its new state-sponsored food sites for starving Palestinians - in areas surrounded by IDF troops isn't setting a trap for people desperate to eat?

Isn't funneling Palestinians toward the guns of IDF soldiers?
 
If there is any silver lining to the current genocide in Gaza, it may come in the form of criminal prosecutions for those who profit from war and debt:

https://consortiumnews.com/2025/06/...tent&eId=72a18643-827c-491d-b8c0-25bb46f562f7

"In her forthcoming report, (Francesca) Albanese will detail exactly how Palestine has been exploited by the global capitalist system and will highlight the role certain corporations have played in the genocide:


What changes if US prisons begin filling with rich white-collar war criminals from Wall Street and DC?

What doesn't.
Its been a constant displacement. Settlers are continuing the violent displacement of palestinians.
 
Back
Top Bottom