• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Isn't it about time that a Lady should be President of the US?

Isn't it about time that a Lady should be President of the US?

  • yes

    Votes: 24 70.6%
  • no

    Votes: 9 26.5%
  • better: a non-binary person .....

    Votes: 1 2.9%

  • Total voters
    34
I have to ask, how long has it been since anyone voted for a President based on mere "qualifications" and not based on one's sentiment combined with values?

Has anyone here ever voted for a candidate who they viscerally despised over one who they liked on the basis that the candidate they voted for was simply more qualified than their opponent?
Yes, in 2016
 
Biden is in such cognitive decline, he probably needs assistance going to the bathroom. I could :poop: a more qualified president then Biden.
You have absolutely zero basis to make the comment, so it amount to defamation and name calling. Pretty childish on your part, if you ask me.

Meanwhile, the previous guy suffers from acute narcissistic personality disorder (and I will point out, very well documented by experts in the field), which manifested itself in the fact that he could not accept the fact that he was sounded defeated in the last election. We all witnessed his meltdown, which carries on to this day. Even you are more qualified than that guy.
 
Women have very meaningful roles in the Catholic Church, so that is simply a lie on your part, it appears it is you who is willfully ignorant and so much so you cannot provide any examples while spouting lies
Oh they do? Give us just one truly meaningful role women play in the Catholic Church that isn’t subservient to the men that run it. You can’t because it doesn’t exist. The Catholic Church is a wholly male dominated entity. You must not be Catholic because you would know that already if you were and wouldn’t be making such clueless posts about something you obviously know nothing about.
 
Oh they do? Give us just one truly meaningful role women play in the Catholic Church that isn’t subservient to the men that run it. You can’t because it doesn’t exist. The Catholic Church is a wholly male dominated entity. You must not be Catholic because you would know that already if you were and wouldn’t be making such clueless posts about something you obviously know nothing about.
Women serve in religious orders according to the role they were made for.

Women cannot be validly ordained as a priest, the powers of a priest do not transmit to women. Even if a bishop said the rite of ordination that women would not be validly a priest since Christ does not authorize women to act in his person.
 
Women serve in religious orders according to the role they were made for.

Women cannot be validly ordained as a priest, the powers of a priest do not transmit to women. Even if a bishop said the rite of ordination that women would not be validly a priest since Christ does not authorize women to act in his person.
So women are forever subservient and inferior to men because that is the role they ‘were made for’. Guess that tells us all we need to know about you. The misogyny is strong in you. But what else should we expect from you but the worse.
 
Additional question:

If a Lady - which Lady?
Too late, Phyllis Schlafly is already dead. So, there really isn't any American woman who would be qualified.
 
So women are forever subservient and inferior to men because that is the role they ‘were made for’. Guess that tells us all we need to know about you. The misogyny is strong in you. But what else should we expect from you but the worse.
It’s not inferior to be properly obedient to authority.

Men and women are different and complementary.
 
It’s not inferior to be properly obedient to authority.

Men and women are different and complementary.
Depends on where the authority comes from. And It's not inferior to be defiant of authority, either. If your defiance prevails, It's been justified.
 
Depends on where the authority comes from. And It's not inferior to be defiant of authority. If your defiance prevails, It's been justified.
Not in the church. Women cannot be ordained and thus if women were ordained in sacreligious ceremonies they couldn’t forgive sins in confession or consecrate the Eucharist and thus people counting on those sacraments will go to hell.

So there is physical limits. Being defiant of the authority of reality brings terrible consequences. Just like widespread sodomy and gender bending in Greece and Rome in their late stages led to the fall of those societies
 
Poor whities. :LOL:
When someone makes a racist, disparaging remark about a minority they are labeled as an asshole, a jerk, stupid, the whole gamut.

Question: How is it different when a racist remark is made about a non-minority?
Answer: It isn't.
 
Not in the church. Women cannot be ordained and thus if women were ordained in sacreligious ceremonies they couldn’t forgive sins in confession or consecrate the Eucharist and thus people counting on those sacraments will go to hell.

So there is physical limits. Being defiant of the authority of reality brings terrible consequences. Just like widespread sodomy and gender bending in Greece and Rome in their late stages led to the fall of those societies
We're not talking about the church. Your church or anyone elses. And if you intend to rely on the authority of the Catholic church as the arbiter of authority, there's no room for discussion. Is that your intention?
 
It’s not inferior to be properly obedient to authority.

Men and women are different and complementary.
Stop dodging the question. Is it your position that women are naturally inferior to men and divinely intended to be subservient to men, and if so, how can either possibly be complementary in relation to one another if it is only just one side that benefits from that exclusively patriarchal relationship?
 
Isn't it about time that a Lady should be President of the US?
I had to vote no because of the way you asked it.

Time has nothing to do with it.

If she is more qualified and, let's face it, more popular than her male opponent, then she will be elected.
 
I don't think women should vote.
I think only women should vote.

The world would be a better place.
You can't post a contradiction and expect people to now what you are saying.
 
Too late, Phyllis Schlafly is already dead. So, there really isn't any American woman who would be qualified.
I had to look up the name "Schlafly"

Mrs. America is an American historical drama television miniseries produced by FX and originally aired on sister streaming service FX on Hulu. Created and co-written by Davhi Waller and directed by Anna Boden and Ryan Fleck, Amma Asante, Laure de Clermont-Tonnerre and Janicza Bravo, the series details the political movement to pass the Equal Rights Amendment and the unexpected backlash led by conservative activist Phyllis Schlafly in the 1970s. It features a large ensemble cast led by Cate Blanchett, Rose Byrne, Uzo Aduba, Elizabeth Banks, Margo Martindale, John Slattery, Tracey Ullman, and Sarah Paulson.

 
I don't think women should vote.
I think only women should vote.

The world would be a better place.
How, exactly would it be a better place? Do you think world peace, no poverty and no conflicts would be the norm if a woman was in charge? If so, you don't know women!
 
Only man make good President. Man strong, smart. Woman no belong except bedroom and kitchen.

*thumps chest and grunts*
You have that backwards. Kitchen then bedroom.
 
Back
Top Bottom