- Joined
- Mar 17, 2016
- Messages
- 14,235
- Reaction score
- 1,453
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Undisclosed
The order to pull out of Iraq was signed by Bush.
But the decision to leave 0 troops was Obamas.
The order to pull out of Iraq was signed by Bush.
The order to pull out of Iraq was signed by Bush.
Actually:
This is your perception of who his actions favor being used to determine his religion after having stated it was debatable (see definition of the word: moot) that Obama was a Muslim. Would you care to rephrase your statements to mesh with your current position that you're not saying Obama is a super secret Muslim?
But the decision to leave 0 troops was Obamas.
The U.S.–Iraq Status of Forces Agreement (official name: Agreement Between the United States of America and the Republic of Iraq On the Withdrawal of United States Forces from Iraq and the Organization of Their Activities during Their Temporary Presence in Iraq) was a status of forces agreement (SOFA) between Iraq and the United States, signed by President George W. Bush in 2008. It established that U.S. combat forces would withdraw from Iraqi cities by June 30, 2009, and all U.S. combat forces will be completely out of Iraq by December 31, 2011.[1]
The order to pull out of Iraq was signed by Bush.
No, coldjoint, the decision to leave "0 troops" wasn't Obama's. It was in the agreement Bush signed:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/U.S.–Iraq_Status_of_Forces_Agreement
You can either inform yourself and admit you are wrong, or you can double down with another bull**** statement. It's up to you. It's definitely better than continuing to sell conspiracy theories.
Funny how Obama is taking credit for it then
The Obameter: Direct military leaders to end war in Iraq | PolitiFact
Obama was advised to leave troops there. And could of done that. What Bush signed lost its authority under a new president.
And this conspiracy crap is not being advanced by me. I have said conspiracy 0 times. I have seen you say it every post.
Obama was advised to leave troops there. And could of done that. What Bush signed lost its authority under a new president.
And this conspiracy crap is not being advanced by me. I have said conspiracy 0 times. I have seen you say it every post.
Last time, Obamas policies have strengthed Islamists and made the world, and the US, far less safe than it has ever been before.
Really? Agreements signed by the President of the United States are only valid until there's a new President?
Must inspire confidence in your allies, I bet.
He doesn't understand or know how international agreements actually work. I don't think he understands that these agreements don't bind the person who signed them. They bind the countries that are party to it. If his statement held any water, NAFTA would no longer have authority when Bush II came to power.
Hell, we can go local and say the Civil Rights Act of 1968 no longer held authority once Nixon came into power. His position betrays a level of ignorance that is absolutely astounding.
Actually, if the same rule could be made internationally it would add a cool, video-RPG-game quality to diplomacy.
International agreements aren't dependent on the executives who signed them being in power but on the parties involved existing. So no, don't repeat the asinine assertion that an international agreement is rendered void by an election. Please, don't double down on this absurd point.
You are a conspiracy theorist and you should try your hardest to distance yourself from it. Obama isn't a secret muslim. That isn't moot.
You are 3 strikes down. So far you've been wrong about every absurd claim you've tried to make. I'd give up if I were you.
Really? Agreements signed by the President of the United States are only valid until there's a new President?
Must inspire confidence in your allies, I bet.
Who died and made you boss. Your opinion of me is also a moot point. You should just talk to yourself, I doubt anyone else is interested.
Lmao, giving up already? I would too if I had been proven wrong 3 times in a row in less than 3 posts. Let's examine how you were proven wrong:
1. Obama made the decision to pull out of Iraq.
Truth: The order for troop removal was signed by the Bush administration.
2. Obama made the decision to leave zero troops in Iraq.
Truth: The order for complete troop removal is in the agreement signed by the Bush administration.
3. International agreements are rendered void by an election.
Truth: That's absolutely stupid and indicative of just how little you know about global politics.
Let me gues.... you are a Trump supporter?
Our allies have 0 confidence in us thanks to Obama. And I refer to the Iran agreement that any president, but Clinton, will cancel or eviscerate.
You talking to me?:lamo
It's pretty apparent that you're now running away. There is no need to waste bandwidth after being wasted by another poster.
You have the market cornered on wasting bandwith. And I am not running, you are making excuses, transferring blame, and pushing a tired narrative.
Making... what excuses? You make 3 claims. All 3 are demonstrably wrong. Why are you still wasting bandwidth doing something other than admitting you were wrong?
Just checking with the thread...still more jokes about Radiohead or have we diverted to other topics OTHER than the fact that Muslims in the loving and peaceful religion of Islam beat the **** out of a bunch of people with pipes for listening to music and having a beer?
I could pick apart your claims.