I'm not sure what "the view expressed in this thread" is.
Is it the view that Islamophobia is being used as a political chip today? Then, yes.
Is it the view that historical Christianity five hundred years in the past should be used as a political chip today? Then, no.
Is it the view that all religion is evil? Then, no.
Is it the view that the Spanish Inquisition offsets contemporary jihadist terrorism? Then, no.
Is it the view that jihadist terrorism should not be a political issue? Then, no.
Is it the view that Christianity is a religion of violence? Then, no.
I will oppose the term Jihadist. In fact, they are criminals with a very violent history. They twisted the Religious texts for their own purpose.
In fact, Simon Peter, one of Jesus disciples drew his sword and struck the high priest servant,
End
But Jesus answered, "No more of this!" And he touched the man's ear and healed him. (Luke 22:51)
Nice cherry picking out of context.
The question, why he did before?
What????
Btw, I'm still waiting for you to tell us how jihadists have "twisted" Islam. C'mon, you can do it.
First, it is a very long subject how the so-called jihadist twisted Islam. In my opinion, their existence isn't Islamic. They serve their narrow political and economic view, and for sure, the Western powers interest not the interest of Islam and Muslims. second, I wish to tell you that you can direct your questions to Ronald Regan or Margaret Thatcher but the problem that they are deceased. They call these terrorists now, freedom fighters. Finally, it's a waste of time to elaborate on your concerns because it will not change anything from your side.
So, that's a no. You can't give us so much as one little example. Not even one . Got it.
do you agree with what China is doing to Muslims? Is that a proper way to deal with Islam? (Putting into 'reeducation camps', and using aversion thearpy (torture actually) to get them to embrace theism, the Chinese state and XI in specific?)
So, that's a no. You can't give us so much as one little example. Not even one . Got it.
God bless your ignorance. You make a statement of your own on behalf of someone and agree on that statement too
do you agree with what China is doing to Muslims? Is that a proper way to deal with Islam? (Putting into 'reeducation camps', and using aversion thearpy (torture actually) to get them to embrace theism, the Chinese state and XI in specific?)
Here are your words from post #3:
I will oppose the term Jihadist. In fact, they are criminals with a very violent history. They twisted the Religious texts for their own purpose.
When challenged to provide an example to demonstrate how they do that, you can't. All you have to do is give a verse, then explain how it has been manipulated to serve the purposes of those who would do us harm. Should be easy for you if you're correct. But, you aren't. You tell a lie, and I'm going to repeat the challenge every time you repeat the lie.
I answered you. Was that a real question, or were you just trolling again? Never mind. I know the answer to that one too.
I am not a student of yours to receive questions that I must answer, or I will be the naughty student. Google is full of answers to all your question. In addition, you can find hundreds of Islamic website working full time to answer your concerns if you are looking for answers not just to argue. I expressed my views briefly in that thread. However, details are a totally different case. What is the point of wasting my time to explain in details how the so-called jihadist twisted the verses of the Quran? I told that their existence by itself isn't Islamic in my opinion.
He is a troller. Don't waste your time with him
This from you????
People keep saying this, but nobody has ever given a concrete example. I challenge you to be the first.
YOU made a declarative statement. YOU should be able to back it up.
If your interpretation of Islam was correct, there would be a large scale insurgency going on in the United States right now.
After all, we have plenty of Muslims.
But no such thing has occurred.
Gee, I wonder why that is? :roll:
The problem is that I don't care about religion to back my declarative statement as you described it. I don't defend religion but a history. I don't find myself obliged to answer every question and every concern of yours and others because I don't have time for it. You notice that I don't log in very often. Throwing accusations is very easy. However, answering them is a different story.
Because most Muslims just want to live peaceful lives?
If your interpretation of Islam was correct,
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?