- Joined
- Mar 17, 2016
- Messages
- 14,235
- Reaction score
- 1,453
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Undisclosed
Did you really say that? You should have said compare modern to medieval. They seem pretty much the same.
Ideologically speaking, there is no difference.
Heiferdust. Take the time to actually study Islamic History and you'll find quite distinct eras within the history. Your insistence that they are all the same is simply ignorance.
So you are ignoring the difference between Islam at the time of muhammad and at, say, the time of the Nasrids in Spain?
Heiferdust. Take the time to actually study Islamic History and you'll find quite distinct eras within the history. Your insistence that they are all the same is simply ignorance.
Modernized Western Islam?
No such animal. Islam cannot change. If you wish to use westernized and modern, that is fine, just don't tack Islam on the end.
Have you ever even met a Muslim before? If you haven't, you'll have to forgive me if I ignore your baseless opinions according. I've met more than I can count. I'm pretty sure I know what I'm talking about here, and I'm pretty certain you just like spouting self-affirming, jingoistic bull****.
There's no such thing. There is no King James version of the Qur'an.
There are however modernized, Western Muslims.
Given that most Christians aren't sentencing people to death for wearing multi-fabric clothes, stoning homosexuals, jailing fornicators and adulterers, and so on, I'm not sure what your point is here.
Have you ever even met a Muslim before? If you haven't, you'll have to forgive me if I ignore your baseless opinions according. I've met more than I can count. I'm pretty sure I know what I'm talking about here, and I'm pretty certain you just like spouting self-affirming, jingoistic bull****.
No such animal. Islam cannot change. If you wish to use westernized and modern, that is fine, just don't tack Islam on the end.
There's no such thing. There is no King James version of the Qur'an.
There are however modernized, Western Muslims.
I'm sure that Fox News highly edited out their real issues, but that being said it's hard for me to listen to ISIS talk about Christianity and Western Imperialism after the things they've done to other countries and ethnic groups --or their own children, for christ's sake.
I'm not sure I attach any meaning to "peaceful" in the context of Islam than I do socialism/libertarianism/etc being peaceful or violent. Salafi Islam is clearly violent, in both it's non-militant (They aren't violent to other groups, but they are quite violent to people living in their lands, e.g. Saudi Arabia's absurdly high death penalty cases) and militant cases (e.g. terrorism, death penalty, slavery, sexual abuse of children, etc). Modernized Western Islam? Not really a violent ideology in the least, and they stand in diametric opposition to Salafism. There's no risk of them committing terrorism or being violent or supporting violent Islam.
You referred to "modernized Western Islam", and I said there is no such thing. There are however modernized Western Muslims. I 'm drawing a distinction between the creed and its adherents.
Islam is a subject that can be discussed in it's own right, independent of how many Muslims you may have met. It starts with the Qur'an, hadiths, and the life and times of Mohamed and the first Muslims.
If we can't agree on that, I will bid you adieu.
could say the same about christianity, most of whose adherents have become less fundamentalist
I'm sure that Fox News highly edited out their real issues, but that being said it's hard for me to listen to ISIS talk about Christianity and Western Imperialism after the things they've done to other countries and ethnic groups --or their own children, for christ's sake.
I'm not sure I attach any meaning to "peaceful" in the context of Islam than I do socialism/libertarianism/etc being peaceful or violent. Salafi Islam is clearly violent, in both it's non-militant (They aren't violent to other groups, but they are quite violent to people living in their lands, e.g. Saudi Arabia's absurdly high death penalty cases) and militant cases (e.g. terrorism, death penalty, slavery, sexual abuse of children, etc). Modernized Western Islam? Not really a violent ideology in the least, and they stand in diametric opposition to Salafism. There's no risk of them committing terrorism or being violent or supporting violent Islam.
Where does it say they are doing this because they have no jobs, like this administration wants us to believe?