• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Is There Collusion Between Alan Grayson and MSNBC?

I named the thread after the title of the article, not based on my personal beliefs or conclusions.

As far as I know there is no reqirement in Bias as to how you name threads, in Breaking News there is. For you to say it is not based upon your personal beliefs or conclusions doesn't ring true. Your commentary was: All I can say is "lolololololololololololololol"
 
Know why there are no threads asking "Is there collusion between Fox News and the Republican Party?" Because for there to be "collusion," there would have to be two separate entities. You have one cable news network that stages events for Republicans, lies for them, and gets its scripts straight from the Party; you have another (CNN) whose election "coverage" mainly consists of giving Republicans free airtime to lie; and then you have MSNBC, a business that was dragged kicking and screaming (and not always convincingly) into RE-organizing its programming around a center-left audience when FNC beat it out for the radical right (a coveted advertising demographic, because they believe everything they're told and have plenty of money to waste). The "liberal media" is as nonexistent as the "International Jewish Conspiracy" that the right used to rely on as its bugaboo.
now that's a new one. What is this "international jewish conspiracy?". I'm afraid i haven't heard of it.
 
The "liberal media" is as nonexistent as the "International Jewish Conspiracy" that the right used to rely on as its bugaboo.

Those canards about the International Jewish Conspiracy are furthered mostly by the hard left these days.
 
Theres much more evidence for a pro-israeli bias and direct effect of Israeli affiliated institutions on the US media, than there was for any international Jewish conspiracy.

Those canards about the International Jewish Conspiracy are furthered mostly by the hard left these days.

Let's call that an opinion.
 
Grayson gets his butt handed to him in Florida!

See ya Alan.
 
I named the thread after the title of the article, not based on my personal beliefs or conclusions.
As far as I know there is no reqirement in Bias as to how you name threads, in Breaking News there is. For you to say it is not based upon your personal beliefs or conclusions doesn't ring true. Your commentary was: All I can say is "lolololololololololololololol"

chirp, chirp, chirp
 
That psycho needed to go.
 
it's been a joke on NRO for some time now that Grayson was just using his seat as a two-year audition for MSNBC; where he would be a slightly-less vitriolic Kieth Olberman. be hilarious if that turned out to be truth :D
 
With all the free time and promotion from Fox News I'm not surprised he won.

i watch FOX pretty much every evening; i can't recall ever seeing the guy.
 
i watch FOX pretty much every evening; i can't recall ever seeing the guy.

I watch Fox a lot too, and only recall seeing him 2 times since he quit the network to run for office.
 
With all the free time and promotion from Fox News I'm not surprised he won.

Apparently, you must think Ohioans get most of their information from Fox News. Which implies quite a bit about you, actually.
 
Apparently, you must think Ohioans get most of their information from Fox News. Which implies quite a bit about you, actually.
I didn't say they did and since you think I did, that implies quite a bit about you ----- actually. :mrgreen:
 
now that's a new one.

Actually, it's an old one.

What is this "international jewish conspiracy?".

The real history of it is that the regime of Czar Nicholas II wrote a book titled "Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion" to rationalize pogroms against Russian Jews. The book was translated and became a worldwide bestseller, catalyzing anti-semitic right-wing movements around the world including, ultimately, the Nazi Party. For the first half of the 20th century, Jews were basically treated as anything from an "unsavory element" to a sinister menace even in the United States. Henry Ford wrote a screed against Jews called "The International Jew." Basically, right-wingers had a very simple explanation for all their problems: Jews. Jews in government, Jews in the media, Jews in academia. Jews, Jews, Jews. If they didn't like a fact printed by a newspaper, it was because it was part of the "Jew-run media" according to conservatives. If they didn't like a study from a university, it was because of all the "Commie Jews" on the faculty. And the right didn't even stop using it after WW2 - it just eventually stopped being effective because nobody cared anymore much past the '70s. So then moved on to new bugaboos, new propaganda bogeyman, new people to inspire hate and violence against. Because that's just the sort of people conservatives are.
 
Last edited:
Actually, it's an old one.



The real history of it is that the regime of Czar Nicholas II wrote a book titled "Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion" to rationalize pogroms against Russian Jews. The book was translated and became a worldwide bestseller, catalyzing anti-semitic right-wing movements around the world including, ultimately, the Nazi Party. For the first half of the 20th century, Jews were basically treated as anything from an "unsavory element" to a sinister menace even in the United States. Henry Ford wrote a screed against Jews called "The International Jew." Basically, right-wingers had a very simple explanation for all their problems: Jews. Jews in government, Jews in the media, Jews in academia. Jews, Jews, Jews. If they didn't like a fact printed by a newspaper, it was because it was part of the "Jew-run media" according to conservatives. If they didn't like a study from a university, it was because of all the "Commie Jews" on the faculty. And the right didn't even stop using it after WW2 - it just eventually stopped being effective because nobody cared anymore much past the '70s. So then moved on to new bugaboos, new propaganda bogeyman, new people to inspire hate and violence against. Because that's just the sort of people conservatives are.
like liberals? :/

please, im sure you have more than one source cited that EVERYONE on the right hates and always has, hate jews.
 
:lol: yeah. antisemitism a right-wing phenomenon. :roll: :lol:

Henry Ford was a Progressive. as were the Eugenicists who tended to look down on Jewish blood as a genetically inferior infestation of "good white north european stock" (though admittedly they tended to worry more about 'the negro and mongrelized asian hordes'; they were really sweet people.)
 
Anti-Semitism is rather rampant among the left at present. Much of it takes the guise of being "pro-Palestinian."
 
I didn't say they did and since you think I did, that implies quite a bit about you ----- actually. :mrgreen:

If you think that the only reason Kasich won was because of Fox News, you must. Sorry, dude; math is math.
 
If you think that the only reason Kasich won was because of Fox News, you must. Sorry, dude; math is math.

I'm not going to say that was the only reason, but it sure didn't hurt. It gave him free face time with his base.
 
Actually, it's an old one.



The real history of it is that the regime of Czar Nicholas II wrote a book titled "Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion" to rationalize pogroms against Russian Jews. The book was translated and became a worldwide bestseller, catalyzing anti-semitic right-wing movements around the world including, ultimately, the Nazi Party. For the first half of the 20th century, Jews were basically treated as anything from an "unsavory element" to a sinister menace even in the United States. Henry Ford wrote a screed against Jews called "The International Jew." Basically, right-wingers had a very simple explanation for all their problems: Jews. Jews in government, Jews in the media, Jews in academia. Jews, Jews, Jews. If they didn't like a fact printed by a newspaper, it was because it was part of the "Jew-run media" according to conservatives. If they didn't like a study from a university, it was because of all the "Commie Jews" on the faculty. And the right didn't even stop using it after WW2 - it just eventually stopped being effective because nobody cared anymore much past the '70s. So then moved on to new bugaboos, new propaganda bogeyman, new people to inspire hate and violence against. Because that's just the sort of people conservatives are.

All you need do is scan the pages of this august message board to find your left-wing compatriots engaging in quite a bit of, er, theorizing about Jewish control of the media. Among other theories.

Something tells me you'll have quite a blind spot for it, however, and for the conservatives calling them out on it.
 
Back
Top Bottom