AmericanbyChoic
Banned
- Joined
- Jul 13, 2013
- Messages
- 236
- Reaction score
- 32
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- Political Leaning
- Undisclosed
Re: Is There Any Way To Cure The "Official Report" Believers
No I don't… the premise is that because it moved, it wasn't on the moon. The premise itself is absurd. That it moved, tells us that some force was applied to it. For the premise to be true, the moon would need to be void of the potential for force to be applied… I'll submit that the flag's pole shifted in its mooring… thus the force in play is gravity over the opposing force or whatever failed causing it to shift.
"FIRE HOT!" Steel Melt when exposed to HOT FIRE for long time."
Well, the evidence seems to be trending the other way… but I'm holding out much hope that you'll find your wind soon.
Well, there's no end to the people of some academic experience who fail to graps the obvious in the real time crisis. I missed the 2012 election fraud and I stand as one of the preeminent authorities on the planet, regarding the means of otherwise reasonable people to underestimate socialists… .
Just a guy that has long made a very nice living building stuff…
Actually it was known immediately… Such material has a very low bond rating and the forces of impact ALONE were more than enough to detach it from the structure.
One would think a physicist would understand that. But you can rest assured that anyone who's ever paid exquisitely painful fines because their technicians were present within the projected period that the local Fire Marshal claims that such was knocked off super structure, would positively know this…
Yep… which faded exponentially with every second that the fire continued to burn.
Okay.
Actually, you do. The flag moved, and the motion was in response to a force, per standard classical mechanics going back to Newton. Saying "something" moved it is a real duh moment. Of course something moved it, or it would've remained stationary! The question - for anyone with half a brain is - WHAT moved it?
No I don't… the premise is that because it moved, it wasn't on the moon. The premise itself is absurd. That it moved, tells us that some force was applied to it. For the premise to be true, the moon would need to be void of the potential for force to be applied… I'll submit that the flag's pole shifted in its mooring… thus the force in play is gravity over the opposing force or whatever failed causing it to shift.
ABC sez: There's virtually no end to the evidence of steel melting…
WHAT? I acknowledged the ad-hoc witness testimony concerning melted steel, but that refers to conditions days and weeks after collapse in the debris pile. There is NO hard evidence. Produce some. Produce ONE thing which proves steel melting was EVEN PRESENT, let alone the cause of collapse.
"FIRE HOT!" Steel Melt when exposed to HOT FIRE for long time."
As I mentioned, and you probably disbelieve, I have a degree (bachelor of science) in physics. If you want to argue physics with me, I'll mop the floor with you. Then everyone will get to see that I DO know the meaning of the word 'ignorant'.
Well, the evidence seems to be trending the other way… but I'm holding out much hope that you'll find your wind soon.
Zdenek Bazant, a world-reknowned structural and mechanical engineer, professor of engineering, author of hundreds of papers on structural engineering and specifically a number of papers about the collapses which are widely recognized as the authoritative analyses on progressive collapse, doesn't seem to agree with you. He says:
Well, there's no end to the people of some academic experience who fail to graps the obvious in the real time crisis. I missed the 2012 election fraud and I stand as one of the preeminent authorities on the planet, regarding the means of otherwise reasonable people to underestimate socialists… .
And you are?
Just a guy that has long made a very nice living building stuff…
NIST disagrees with you and your (lay) pals. They say if the fireproofing hadn't been dislodged by the impacts (something you couldn't possibly have known at the time)
Actually it was known immediately… Such material has a very low bond rating and the forces of impact ALONE were more than enough to detach it from the structure.
One would think a physicist would understand that. But you can rest assured that anyone who's ever paid exquisitely painful fines because their technicians were present within the projected period that the local Fire Marshal claims that such was knocked off super structure, would positively know this…
there was a good chance the buildings could've survived.
Yep… which faded exponentially with every second that the fire continued to burn.