Is there any way to cure a truther?[W:2707]

[Quag]

Re: Is there any way to cure a truther?

I make the statement that all the evidence points to there having been no hijacked
airliners that day. I see violations of the laws of physics in the mainstream media's
explanation of what happened and some people simply brush it aside by saying
that no laws of physics were violated. OK, one of us is wrong, lets let history sort it out.
Note that many years after the fact, the Gulf of Tonkin fiasco was discovered to have been
total FRAUD. I'm confident that in time, the truth will come out.

In the meantime, have fun with that fairy tale about the 19 Arab fanatics.

.... whatever ......

Again because YOU do not understand the laws of physics does not make something against the laws of physics.
All the evidence points to hijacked planes being crashed on 911. All of it! Only made up crap by truthers who want so desperately to think they are some part of the enlighted group who know better than others pretend that this isn't true.
Got evidence show it? haven't even tried to do so yet have you?
nope you got none and never will because the fact is it was 4 planes hijacked and crashed on 911.
truly the truther movement has no clothes!

 

[mike2810]

Re: Is there any way to cure a truther?

It was a broken link..

There are photos existing that clearly show 2 stages of damage. The early photos that were taken after impact that clearly show only a small round hole that is consistent with a missile strike, and then the photos showing more extensive damage after bombs went off. The floors had collapsed. Did those "pancake" as well?

The Pentagon Attack on 9/11: A Refutation of the Pentagon Flyover Hypothesis Based on Analysis of the Flight Path

Scholars for 9/11 Truth & Justice

 

[Menard_K]

Re: Is there any way to cure a truther?

Again because YOU do not understand the laws of physics does not make something against the laws of physics.
All the evidence points to hijacked planes being crashed on 911. All of it! Only made up crap by truthers who want so desperately to think they are some part of the enlighted group who know better than others pretend that this isn't true.
Got evidence show it? haven't even tried to do so yet have you?
nope you got none and never will because the fact is it was 4 planes hijacked and crashed on 911.
truly the truther movement has no clothes!

You have not really looked at the evidence
the fact that two airliners make identical gashes in the sides of two skyscrapers.
the fact that in the case of the Pentagon hit, the "aircraft" strikes the wall
at an angle and does NOT leave tons of aircraft wreckage on the Pentagon lawn,
the fact that WTC7 descends for 2.25 sec at free fall acceleration.
and NONE of this sets of alarms with you?

really?

 

[Thoreau72]

Re: Is there any way to cure a truther?

It's funny Mike and them are still waiting for "peer reviewed papers" before they will commit to thinking one particular way that the paper advances, and then they will all follow like a herd of cattle.

If Dubya & Dick 'fessed up and signed a confession, then they might believe it, but otherwise, they're believers in the gospel. Chapter and verse.

eace

 

[mike2810]

Re: Is there any way to cure a truther?

It's funny Mike and them are still waiting for "peer reviewed papers" before they will commit to thinking one particular way that the paper advances, and then they will all follow like a herd of cattle.

If Dubya & Dick 'fessed up and signed a confession, then they might believe it, but otherwise, they're believers in the gospel. Chapter and verse.

eace

Funny HD,
Best you and others can do is throw personal insults.

I would ask you to prove your statement, yet you never prove anything.
What I accept as creditable is much more realistic than you soaking up everything VToday, or some CT author puts out.
just saying.:mrgreen:

 

[psikeyhackr]

Re: Is there any way to cure a truther?

He didn't and I don't know what he knows but I trust him in that what he knows is beyond extensive and more than anybody, especially some truther, would ever know.

He has probably signed an agreement preventing him from doing so...

And this is important or relevant to what I said how?

Why would he sign any such thing and why would anyone ask him to?

If it is physically possible for the top 15% of a skyscraper to fall straight down and destroy the supporting mass below then why should any physicist have a problem with discussing and explaining it?

psik

 

[Bodi]

Re: Is there any way to cure a truther?

This is a rather odd bit
you see the allegation is that commercial airliners were used as weapons
HOWEVER, since airliners were NOT designed to be weapons and in fact there
is no precedent for any airliner behaving as was seen on 9/11/2001
WHY should an airliner behave as was alleged to have happened on 9/11/2001?

A spoon is not designed to be a weapon either but I bet I could kill you with it, at least spoon your eye out.

 

[Bodi]

Re: Is there any way to cure a truther?

Why would he sign any such thing and why would anyone ask him to?

If it is physically possible for the top 15% of a skyscraper to fall straight down and destroy the supporting mass below then why should any physicist have a problem with discussing and explaining it?

psik

Because of his job and relationship with the government, that's why. Done talking about it.

 

[Menard_K]

Re: Is there any way to cure a truther?

.........
All the evidence points to hijacked planes being crashed on 911. All of it! ......
........ fact is it was 4 planes hijacked and crashed on 911. ........

REALLY? "ALL" of the evidence points to suicidal hijackers taking control of airliners & crashing them into buildings.

How much evidence have you personally reviewed?

oh well .........

have a nice day

: )

 

[Menard_K]

Re: Is there any way to cure a truther?

A spoon is not designed to be a weapon either but I bet I could kill you with it, at least spoon your eye out.

are you making a threat?

 

[Bodi]

Re: Is there any way to cure a truther?

REALLY? "ALL" of the evidence points to suicidal hijackers taking control of airliners & crashing them into buildings.

How much evidence have you personally reviewed?

oh well .........

have a nice day

: )

You live in the Matrix where nothing is real...

 

[Bodi]

Re: Is there any way to cure a truther?

are you making a threat?

Yeah. That is what I just did. I didn't make an analogy and instead I just threatened to kill you, random person on the Internet, with a spoon.

Good analytical skills buddy.

 

[Menard_K]

Re: Is there any way to cure a truther?

Yeah. That is what I just did. I didn't make an analogy and instead I just threatened to kill you, random person on the Internet, with a spoon.

Good analytical skills buddy.

from the world that insists "ALL" of the evidence points to
suicidal hijackers taking control of airliners & crashing them into buildings.

wow
man ...... heavy stuff!


Have a nice day

: )

 

[Bodi]

Re: Is there any way to cure a truther?

from the world that insists "ALL" of the evidence points to
suicidal hijackers taking control of airliners & crashing them into buildings.

wow
man ...... heavy stuff!


Have a nice day

: )

What are you on? You said that the airliners were not designed as weapons so they could NOT be used as weapons... I showed that reasoning to be wrong. Sorry. I know you like to ignore stuff and create tangents... carry on.

 

[Menard_K]

Re: Is there any way to cure a truther?

What are you on? You said that the airliners were not designed as weapons so they could NOT be used as weapons... I showed that reasoning to be wrong. Sorry. I know you like to ignore stuff and create tangents... carry on.

in what way did you prove that an airliner could be used effectively as a weapon?
and indeed produce the sort of damage that was observed on 9/11/2001?

 

[Bodi]

Re: Is there any way to cure a truther?

in what way did you prove that an airliner could be used effectively as a weapon?
and indeed produce the sort of damage that was observed on 9/11/2001?

You are changing the goalposts... you said it could not be used as a weapon. You are now adding "effectively".

An airliner can be used as a weapon and so can a spoon. Do you have any evidence yet?

 

[Menard_K]

Re: Is there any way to cure a truther?

You are changing the goalposts... you said it could not be used as a weapon. You are now adding "effectively".

An airliner can be used as a weapon and so can a spoon. Do you have any evidence yet?

AH, but using the events of 9/11/2001 as "proof" that an airliner can be used as a weapon,
is circular logic ... oops! What I'm asking for is proof that an airliner can do the sort of damage
that was observed on 9/11/2001 (?) any precedent for this?

 

[Bodi]

Re: Is there any way to cure a truther?

AH, but using the events of 9/11/2001 as "proof" that an airliner can be used as a weapon,
is circular logic ... oops! What I'm asking for is proof that an airliner can do the sort of damage
that was observed on 9/11/2001 (?) any precedent for this?

When it happens again THIS will be the precedent. There is always a first time and to declare the first time as not possible because it never happened before is illogical. The first time my ex-wife was crazy to me was just as relevant as the millionth.

 

[mike2810]

Re: Is there any way to cure a truther?

AH, but using the events of 9/11/2001 as "proof" that an airliner can be used as a weapon,
is circular logic ... oops! What I'm asking for is proof that an airliner can do the sort of damage
that was observed on 9/11/2001 (?) any precedent for this?

do you realize how off your questions are?
1. You have been given historical evidence that planes have been used as weapons.

2. To look for precedent of an airliner being used as a weapon before 9/11, proves nothing.
guess you would be asking for precedent of first flight in the US before the Wright Bros.

 

[Quag]

Re: Is there any way to cure a truther?

You have not really looked at the evidence
the fact that two airliners make identical gashes in the sides of two skyscrapers.
the fact that in the case of the Pentagon hit, the "aircraft" strikes the wall
at an angle and does NOT leave tons of aircraft wreckage on the Pentagon lawn,
the fact that WTC7 descends for 2.25 sec at free fall acceleration.
and NONE of this sets of alarms with you?

really?

lol
identical gashes what new nonsense will you come up with next.
There was no problems with any of the crashes they all obeyed the laws of physics.
Again just because you cant get your head around that doesn't make it impossible

 

[Quag]

Re: Is there any way to cure a truther?

REALLY? "ALL" of the evidence points to suicidal hijackers taking control of airliners & crashing them into buildings.

How much evidence have you personally reviewed?

oh well .........

have a nice day

: )

Apparently a heck of a lot more than you have

 

[Quag]

Re: Is there any way to cure a truther?

in what way did you prove that an airliner could be used effectively as a weapon?
and indeed produce the sort of damage that was observed on 9/11/2001?

In what way did you even give a poor explanation of why it couldn't?

 

[Quag]

Re: Is there any way to cure a truther?

AH, but using the events of 9/11/2001 as "proof" that an airliner can be used as a weapon,
is circular logic ... oops! What I'm asking for is proof that an airliner can do the sort of damage
that was observed on 9/11/2001 (?) any precedent for this?

tons of damage has been done by planes crashing but aside from cant think of any that crashed into something on purpose, definitely nothing as large or moving as fast as those used on 911. Does that make it impossible? Not it just makes it a first. Guess we never went to the moon because it was never done before. Heck you aren't even living in the USA because no colony ever successfully rebelled from Britain and set up its own country before. Heck no one ever sailed over the Atlantic before it was done so it could never have happened.
Yes I am mocking your failed logic in case you didn't get the message.

 

[Menard_K]

Re: Is there any way to cure a truther?

tons of damage has been done by planes crashing but aside from cant think of any that crashed into something on purpose, definitely nothing as large or moving as fast as those used on 911. Does that make it impossible? Not it just makes it a first. Guess we never went to the moon because it was never done before. Heck you aren't even living in the USA because no colony ever successfully rebelled from Britain and set up its own country before. Heck no one ever sailed over the Atlantic before it was done so it could never have happened.
Yes I am mocking your failed logic in case you didn't get the message.

Mocking does not constitute proof that an airliner caused all that damage.
people can say "OH but it was going SOOOO fast" however, speed alone does
not impart special qualities to an aircraft such that an aluminum wing can
cut through a steel wall as a hot knife through butter.
There is something VERY wrong with the picture that is presented by the MSM.

 

[Menard_K]

Re: Is there any way to cure a truther?

lol
identical gashes what new nonsense will you come up with next.
There was no problems with any of the crashes they all obeyed the laws of physics.
Again just because you cant get your head around that doesn't make it impossible

I will explain the problem I have with the identical gashes,
please think about this, the wall of the WTC had directly behind it
the horizontal decks so striking the tower wall between decks would be
more likely to penetrate than would striking the wall directly on a location
backed up by a deck. the hijacked airliners could not possibly be guided
with precision such to have both airliners strike the tower wall in exactly the
same manner. Therefore the two different hits by "aircraft" would have to
show differences in the appearance of the gash from penetration.
also, two times over, aluminum aircraft wings behave as a hot knife through butter,
just exactly how is that done? not to mention the fact that one wing would contact
the wall before the other, thus causing tremendous stress to the aircraft, why did it
stay together as it penetrated, to have only the bit that was inside the building shredded?

FLT11 & FLT175 both BOGUS! 9/11/2001 = FRAUD

Wake UP PEOPLE
its later than U think!