Oh so just because none of these things may be banned or happened in reality that doesn't mean that there is an attack on women's reproductive rights. That should have been stated in the OP and made this a debate in fantasy island. You justify attack LOL. So you like that broadcasters call women sluts. Shell we all take off oue shoes and get pregnant. I'm sure you wouldn't see that as attack either.
Oh so just because none of these things may be banned or happened in reality that doesn't mean that there is an attack on women's reproductive rights. That should have been stated in the OP and made this a debate in fantasy island. You justify attack LOL. So you like that broadcasters call women sluts. Shell we all take off oue shoes and get pregnant. I'm sure you wouldn't see that as attack either.
Oh so just because none of these things may be banned or happened in reality that doesn't mean that there is an attack on women's reproductive rights.
That should have been stated in the OP and made this a debate in fantasy island. You justify attack LOL. So you like that broadcasters call women sluts. Shell we all take off oue shoes and get pregnant. I'm sure you wouldn't see that as attack either.
No there is no war on women. If anything we need more woman on woman love...you know for support and such.
Do you support the killing of innocents in war? Do you support the death penalty? Do you support abortion if the woman's life is at risk or in cases of incest or rape? I'm more pro life than you ever dreamed of being. The lack of abortions being legal would do more harm to those already alive then you even consider. On top of it you would bitch about supporting all these unwanted kids. How many will you personally adopt 10 or 20. How many adopted kids do you have now. Stop with the nonsense of protecting unborn children.There is an attack on the murder of innocent unborn children.
Do you support the killing of innocents in war?
Do you support the death penalty?
Do you support abortion if the woman's life is at risk or in cases of incest or rape?
I'm more pro life than you ever dreamed of being.
Do you support the killing of innocents in war? Do you support the death penalty? Do you support abortion if the woman's life is at risk or in cases of incest or rape? I'm more pro life than you ever dreamed of being. The lack of abortions being legal would do more harm to those already alive then you even consider. On top of it you would bitch about supporting all these unwanted kids. How many will you personally adopt 10 or 20. How many adopted kids do you have now. Stop with the nonsense of protecting unborn children.
Umm, I was talking about the POLITICIANS leading the attacks. You know like Romney and Santorum. They have penises. But if you're going to dismiss my comments with "oh that's just a talking point", don't bother responding again because I won't be.
If we had more woman on woman love then there would be less women for you, soccerboi.
Just because it won't be banned doesn't mean that the right isn't constantly under attack. That is a women's reproductive right that is under attack. Some women struggle making that decision and yet they are subjected to protests in front of clinics. Many women do not make that decision lightly. It's not a wasted argument at all. There is certainly a chance that the law could be changed. It was changed once before in 1862 when they banned abortion because the process at the time damaged women's ability to reproduce. It had nothing to do with the fetus. It took about 110 years to get the right back.Not necessarily true. And abortion won't be banned...so it's just another wasted argument.
The problem I have with this argument is that I think any state outlawing abortion or contraception would be violating a woman's right to privacy. In other words, it's unconstitutional.i guess my point is allowing states rights allows choice in itself.like i said if a binch of people were super christian they could move to a state thats super christian,and someone who hates christianity as a view for making laws could move to a state opposing it.
making the federal government choose on these issues is the same as taking away peoples choice to be individual,its like some people like chevy some ford some dodge,but if the federal government had its way everyone would be driving ford and choices would be gone on what a federal government chooses is best for its people without considering what state or local governments view is best.
Your avatar is a picture of a person holding a gun and your trying to say you support life. LOLMy wife is a woman who fights the daily battle against the murder of innocent unborn children. And I support her in this war.
Your avatar is a picture of a person holding a gun and your trying to say you support life. LOL
Your avatar is a picture of a person holding a gun and your trying to say you support life. LOL
Do you support the killing of innocents in war? Do you support the death penalty? Do you support abortion if the woman's life is at risk or in cases of incest or rape? I'm more pro life than you ever dreamed of being. The lack of abortions being legal would do more harm to those already alive then you even consider. On top of it you would bitch about supporting all these unwanted kids. How many will you personally adopt 10 or 20. How many adopted kids do you have now. Stop with the nonsense of protecting unborn children.
Exactly. Attacks don't need to be successful to be attacks.Just because it won't be banned doesn't mean that the right isn't constantly under attack. That is a women's reproductive right that is under attack. Some women struggle making that decision and yet they are subjected to protests in front of clinics. Many women do not make that decision lightly. It's not a wasted argument at all. There is certainly a chance that the law could be changed. It was changed once before in 1862 when they banned abortion because the process at the time damaged women's ability to reproduce. It had nothing to do with the fetus. It took about 110 years to get the right back.
Your avatar is a picture of a person holding a gun and your trying to say you support life. LOL
The founders of the country even allowed abortion. This entire thing is a silly debate. It is not about life if for any reason you are willing to take the life of a living breathing person. I would believe that if there was never a reason you would take a life.I say it has everything to do with life. I am against the death penalty and against interventionist wars as well.
I suppose that depends on when you think life starts.The same could be said for people who support abortion.
Again, that's not a fair accusation. One could easily argue that there is just and unjust killing and that abortion is unjust while other forms of killing (like self-defense) are just.The founders of the country even allowed abortion. This entire thing is a silly debate. It is not about life if for any reason you are willing to take the life of a living breathing person. I would believe that if there was never a reason you would take a life.
Your avatar is a picture of a person holding a gun and your trying to say you support life. LOL
I would also have cancer cells removed as unwanted tissue growing in my body. Those cancer cells are life do you want people with cancer to remove them? That cancer is just trying to grow.Do you want to choose who dies. Are you playing god?
The founders of the country even allowed abortion. This entire thing is a silly debate. It is not about life if for any reason you are willing to take the life of a living breathing person. I would believe that if there was never a reason you would take a life.
I would also have cancer cells removed as unwanted tissue growing in my body. Those cancer cells are life do you want people with cancer to remove them? That cancer is just trying to grow.
I would also have cancer cells removed as unwanted tissue growing in my body. Those cancer cells are life do you want people with cancer to remove them? That cancer is just trying to grow.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?