- Joined
- Dec 1, 2010
- Messages
- 61,746
- Reaction score
- 32,386
- Location
- El Paso Strong
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- Political Leaning
- Conservative
Thomas was a traitor because he allowed Troy Davis to be killed when there was evidence that the allegations against him were forced. He is a traitor because he allowed Troy Davis to be a victim of the racism within the death penalty.
"Anyone who doubts the death penalty’s past connection with racism need only consider this statistic: Between 1930 and 1967 (at which point executions stopped pending a decade-long Supreme Court overhaul of the death penalty), 54 percent of the 3,859 people put to death under civilian authority in the U.S. were African American. This was not only out of proportion with the black share of the total population but also out of proportion with the percentage of serious crimes committed by blacks. Given that history, lingering racism is an undeniable risk factor looming over today’s system." The Death Penalty and Racism - Charles Lane - The American Interest Magazine
"Several years after the death penalty was reinstated in 1976, a University of Iowa law professor, David C. Baldus (who died last month), along with two colleagues, published a study examining more than 2,000 homicides that took place in Georgia beginning in 1972. They found that black defendants were 1.7 times more likely to receive the death penalty than white defendants and that murderers of white victims were 4.3 times more likely to be sentenced to death than those who killed blacks." http://www.nytimes.com/2011/07/09/opinion/09dow.html?_r=0
This is an incredibly un-politically correct opinion, but I believe it is factually correct. Unfortunately, too many people want to bury their head in the sand and pretend otherwise.Absolutely, Black people have been holding down their own by giving other black people the Uncle Tom label for generations.
Dude, how can someone be a traitor to their race unless it's based on race?
This is an incredibly un-politically correct opinion, but I believe it is factually correct. Unfortunately, too many people want to bury their head in the sand and pretend otherwise.
No, in no way do I consider it racist. For me, to be racist, a comment has to indicate superiority or inferiority of a race. Slurs and derogatory comments towards an individual do not necessarily indicate inferiority of a race. In the Clarence Thomas comment, as vile as it was, it did not indicate that he was less than others due to race.
To my way of thinking, we do a disservice by overuse of the word "racist/racism". It should be a big one. As there are a number of examples in this thread, it is used far to often in a petty manner to score political points. I find it embarrassing that racial issues in this country are seen more as politics and less as something to overcome. It's all about pointing fingers at the other guy. It is pathetic, it is sad, and it is holding us back.
If a White calls a Black an "Uncle Tom" or a "Tom" it is racist, if a Black calls a Black it is not.
The double standard is justified because the term means different things to different users.
To a white it is a racial slur just like the n-word: the target's race is what is wrong with him.
To a Black it is a character slur: it is not the target's race that is wrong with him, but his attitude.
It's one black saying to another, "You're not black enough. You're blackness is inferior to mine. You're not like me. I'm better than you. You must be like me to gain approval.", hence it's still a racial pejorative in that it is intended to detract and degrade based on race and/or racial idealism.If a White calls a Black an "Uncle Tom" or a "Tom" it is racist, if a Black calls a Black it is not.
The double standard is justified because the term means different things to different users.
To a white it is a racial slur just like the n-word: the target's race is what is wrong with him.
To a Black it is a character slur: it is not the target's race that is wrong with him, but his attitude.
Well, there's a clear and concise difference between racist and bigot. And I've seen both terms used incorrectly when arguments are made.
But in this case...I think USVIKING on post #16 has come as close to the core of what the "term Uncle Tom" usage does in terms of how it impacts blacks and other races. He posted:
It's one black saying to another, "You're not black enough. You're blackness is inferior to mine. You're not like me. I'm better than you. You must be like me to gain approval.", hence it's still a racial pejorative in that it is intended to detract and degrade based on race and/or racial idealism.
I disagree with that, an insult is not in itself racist. In this case, calling Clarance Thomas an Uncle Tom is not suggesting he is inferior because of his race, so it is not racist.
I don't dispute that, but I'm not so sure today's common usage reflects that. As language is wont to do over time, I think the term has evolved away from that.Yeah, kind of...but the history behind the name is the telling story...and the changing of the story...is the guts of the issue, which does make Uncle Tom a traitor of sorts, that he placates to whites for favors or personal gain.
As I mentioned in a prior post, in the original story of Uncle Tom's Cabin. Uncle Tom was a hero...and died protecting his home, culture, etc. and was far from a traitor or sell-out, if you prefer.
I disagree with that, an insult is not in itself racist. In this case, calling Clarance Thomas an Uncle Tom is not suggesting he is inferior because of his race, so it is not racist.
I disagree with that, an insult is not in itself racist. In this case, calling Clarance Thomas an Uncle Tom is not suggesting he is inferior because of his race, so it is not racist.
:roll: I'll probably regret this, but I'll play along.No such thing as race
I don't dispute that, but I'm not so sure today's common usage reflects that. As language is wont to do over time, I think the term has evolved away from that.
I didn't say such regarding Clarence Thomas.
Calling CT "Uncle Tom" was another way of saying that he's a sell-out to his own race, that he's placating to the ideas of "whitey"...and for some personal gain, whatever that might be???
So I assume that blacks who consider CT an Uncle Tom...isn't making a racist comment, but saying that he's abandoned his culture or race. But whether or not one would include the word "racist" or "bigot"...would be entirely based on their person perception of C.T.'s motives for siding with the majority.
I can't say....because I don't know. I don't live inside of Clarence Thomas' head...
It is saying that he is wrong to rule or even think a certain way because of the race he is.
Clarence Thomas has been referred to as an Uncle Tom since the day he was nominated as a Supreme Court judge and it's entirely because of his race. White judges, regardless of political affiliation are not called Uncle Toms.
I love watching Liberals defend this.
No, it is one black saying "your attitude is not appropriate for a black person.It's one black saying to another, "You're not black enough. You're blackness is inferior to mine. You're not like me. I'm better than you. You must be like me to gain approval.", hence it's still a racial pejorative in that it is intended to detract and degrade based on race and/or racial idealism.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?