Yes that is the definition of racism and if japan does that they are racist
So instead of dealing with the issue, you're just going to go the nihilistic route and pretend that we don't both know exactly what white is. Your dodging of the issue speaks volumes.What's a white country? Examples?
I stand by my post. It is the very definition of racismI asked this question in another thread and got what I found to be a very interesting answer.
So what do you think? Is it racist for a white country to remain white?
I'm not dodging the issue, I simply want the parameters clearly defined.So instead of dealing with the issue, you're just going to go the nihilistic route and pretend that we don't both know exactly what white is. Your dodging of the issue speaks volumes.
Sent from my HTC6545LVW using Tapatalk
I just wanted to quote the entire post. No, obviously Japan is not a white country. We both know that. So quit playing semantics and give a straight answer.I'm not dodging the issue, I simply want the parameters clearly defined.
What's a white country? Japan was listed in the OP, but last I checked, Japanese aren't considered white/Caucasian. So, you can see my conflict, yes?
Australia was a good example.What's a white country? Examples?
You realize the implication of this, right? If remaining white is racism, then by necessity white existence is itself racist. You're essentially supporting the notion that all white people are racist, which while common among SJW types, will totally isolate you from most decent, working Americans.Yes, discrimination on the basis of race is racism.
I asked this question in another thread and got what I found to be a very interesting answer.
So what do you think? Is it racist for a white country to remain white?
Australia was a good example.
Until about the 1970s it had a "White Australia" policy which barred non-white immigration.
Most European countries probably had similar restrictions for most of their histories.
It depends mainly on why and how they remain that way.I asked this question in another thread and got what I found to be a very interesting answer.
So what do you think? Is it racist for a white country to remain white?
So instead of dealing with the issue, you're just going to go the nihilistic route and pretend that we don't both know exactly what white is. Your dodging of the issue speaks volumes.
Sent from my HTC6545LVW using Tapatalk
You realize the implication of this, right? If remaining white is racism, then by necessity white existence is itself racist. You're essentially supporting the notion that all white people are racist, which while common among SJW types, will totally isolate you from most decent, working Americans.
Sent from my HTC6545LVW using Tapatalk
That would be, but would barring immigration to a white country and thus stabilizing demographics so that it remains white would be racist according to what you said earlier.What? How the **** did you get to there from "discrimination on the basis of race is racism"? If Obama had halted immigration to the US except for Africans in an effort to make the US black, would that not have been racism?
That would be, but would barring immigration to a white country and thus stabilizing demographics so that it remains white would be racist according to what you said earlier.
Sent from my HTC6545LVW using Tapatalk
Also based on this you must agree that the visa diversity lottery is racist.What? How the **** did you get to there from "discrimination on the basis of race is racism"? If Obama had halted immigration to the US except for Africans in an effort to make the US black, would that not have been racism?
None, and the ones who are importing the most foreigners are seeing the greatest increases in violent crime.Yes that is racist. What "white" country does that?
None, and the ones who are importing the most foreigners are seeing the greatest increases in violent crime.
Sent from my HTC6545LVW using Tapatalk
That would be, but would barring immigration to a white country and thus stabilizing demographics so that it remains white would be racist according to what you said earlier.
Sent from my HTC6545LVW using Tapatalk
The ones that have come closest like Poland have negligible rates of homicide.So.....again.....no country on earth is willing to adopt your plan. Ok
Also based on this you must agree that the visa diversity lottery is racist.
Sent from my HTC6545LVW using Tapatalk
Because pursuing diversity qua diversity isn't a moral good. Why should we disrupt homogeneity with diversity?Yes, because barring immigration for the explicit purpose of maintaining racial purity is still racist.
How do you think it's not racist? What is your definition of racism, and why doesn't this fit it?
Yeah, and there's no correlation between those two things. :rollAs far as I'm aware, the visa lottery is based on nationality, not race.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?