• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Is it Racist for White Countries to Remain White?

Is it Racist for White Countries to Remain White?

  • Yes

    Votes: 23 38.3%
  • No

    Votes: 37 61.7%

  • Total voters
    60

phattonez

Catholic
DP Veteran
Joined
Jun 3, 2009
Messages
30,870
Reaction score
4,246
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Very Conservative
I asked this question in another thread and got what I found to be a very interesting answer.

Yes that is the definition of racism and if japan does that they are racist

So what do you think? Is it racist for a white country to remain white?
 
What's a white country? Examples?
 
What's a white country? Examples?
So instead of dealing with the issue, you're just going to go the nihilistic route and pretend that we don't both know exactly what white is. Your dodging of the issue speaks volumes.

Sent from my HTC6545LVW using Tapatalk
 
I asked this question in another thread and got what I found to be a very interesting answer.



So what do you think? Is it racist for a white country to remain white?
I stand by my post. It is the very definition of racism
 
So instead of dealing with the issue, you're just going to go the nihilistic route and pretend that we don't both know exactly what white is. Your dodging of the issue speaks volumes.

Sent from my HTC6545LVW using Tapatalk
I'm not dodging the issue, I simply want the parameters clearly defined.

What's a white country? Japan was listed in the OP, but last I checked, Japanese aren't considered white/Caucasian. So, you can see my conflict, yes?
 
I'm not dodging the issue, I simply want the parameters clearly defined.

What's a white country? Japan was listed in the OP, but last I checked, Japanese aren't considered white/Caucasian. So, you can see my conflict, yes?
I just wanted to quote the entire post. No, obviously Japan is not a white country. We both know that. So quit playing semantics and give a straight answer.

Sent from my HTC6545LVW using Tapatalk
 
What's a white country? Examples?
Australia was a good example.

Until about the 1970s it had a "White Australia" policy which barred non-white immigration.

Most European countries probably had similar restrictions for most of their histories.
 
Yes, discrimination on the basis of race is racism.
You realize the implication of this, right? If remaining white is racism, then by necessity white existence is itself racist. You're essentially supporting the notion that all white people are racist, which while common among SJW types, will totally isolate you from most decent, working Americans.

Sent from my HTC6545LVW using Tapatalk
 
I asked this question in another thread and got what I found to be a very interesting answer.



So what do you think? Is it racist for a white country to remain white?

Depends. On the other hand, it is generally a ****ing retarded goal for a country.
 
Australia was a good example.

Until about the 1970s it had a "White Australia" policy which barred non-white immigration.

Most European countries probably had similar restrictions for most of their histories.

Yep. At it's inception, Australia barred anyone from outside Western Europe from immigrating to Australia, at one point even refusing to allow shipwrecked sailors on to shore. The policy was first relaxed in the wake of WW2, allowing people of North Mediterranean and Eastern European descent to enter into the nation. From then on successive governments watered it down until it was abolished entirely in 1975.
 
I asked this question in another thread and got what I found to be a very interesting answer.



So what do you think? Is it racist for a white country to remain white?
It depends mainly on why and how they remain that way.

If it involves not allowing immigration, then perhaps not. Yet if the reason is because they don't want any non-white persons in their area, then probably. But if it's a desire for cultural stability, then maybe not.
If it involves selective immigration that lets white people but no others in, then almost surely.
If it involves forcible expulsion or termination of anyone not white, then without question.

As a few examples.
 
So instead of dealing with the issue, you're just going to go the nihilistic route and pretend that we don't both know exactly what white is. Your dodging of the issue speaks volumes.

Sent from my HTC6545LVW using Tapatalk

No, stop playing cute and give us "YOUR definition" or whatever definition it is you think CONSTITUTES a "so called" white country.
It could be a country that was something else, then was settled by whites who instituted apartheid, or it could be a country that has codified "WHITES ONLY" into its constitution from the very get go, or it could be something else.

If you don't want to get into specifics, then your thread isn't worth answering.
 
You realize the implication of this, right? If remaining white is racism, then by necessity white existence is itself racist. You're essentially supporting the notion that all white people are racist, which while common among SJW types, will totally isolate you from most decent, working Americans.

Sent from my HTC6545LVW using Tapatalk

What? How the **** did you get to there from "discrimination on the basis of race is racism"? If Obama had halted immigration to the US except for Africans in an effort to make the US black, would that not have been racism?
 
What? How the **** did you get to there from "discrimination on the basis of race is racism"? If Obama had halted immigration to the US except for Africans in an effort to make the US black, would that not have been racism?
That would be, but would barring immigration to a white country and thus stabilizing demographics so that it remains white would be racist according to what you said earlier.

Sent from my HTC6545LVW using Tapatalk
 
That would be, but would barring immigration to a white country and thus stabilizing demographics so that it remains white would be racist according to what you said earlier.

Sent from my HTC6545LVW using Tapatalk

Yes that is racist. What "white" country does that?
 
What? How the **** did you get to there from "discrimination on the basis of race is racism"? If Obama had halted immigration to the US except for Africans in an effort to make the US black, would that not have been racism?
Also based on this you must agree that the visa diversity lottery is racist.

Sent from my HTC6545LVW using Tapatalk
 
What are the hell are white countries? Please tell.
 
Yes that is racist. What "white" country does that?
None, and the ones who are importing the most foreigners are seeing the greatest increases in violent crime.

Sent from my HTC6545LVW using Tapatalk
 
None, and the ones who are importing the most foreigners are seeing the greatest increases in violent crime.

Sent from my HTC6545LVW using Tapatalk

So.....again.....no country on earth is willing to adopt your plan. Ok
 
That would be, but would barring immigration to a white country and thus stabilizing demographics so that it remains white would be racist according to what you said earlier.

Sent from my HTC6545LVW using Tapatalk

Yes, because barring immigration for the explicit purpose of maintaining racial purity is still racist.

How do you think it's not racist? What is your definition of racism, and why doesn't this fit it?
 
So.....again.....no country on earth is willing to adopt your plan. Ok
The ones that have come closest like Poland have negligible rates of homicide.

Sent from my HTC6545LVW using Tapatalk
 
Yes, because barring immigration for the explicit purpose of maintaining racial purity is still racist.

How do you think it's not racist? What is your definition of racism, and why doesn't this fit it?
Because pursuing diversity qua diversity isn't a moral good. Why should we disrupt homogeneity with diversity?

Sent from my HTC6545LVW using Tapatalk
 
As far as I'm aware, the visa lottery is based on nationality, not race.
Yeah, and there's no correlation between those two things. :roll

Sent from my HTC6545LVW using Tapatalk
 
Back
Top Bottom