The fact that you choose to troll people online instead of "disproving" AGW in peer-reviewed journals says everything: that you know every last one of you Anonymous Internet Deniers are lying for political reasons.
That's why it's so funny when you think you sound like you're *getting* someone.
The worst bit is that our children and grandchildren will pay for the dishonest arrogance of denierism.
AGW is very real, just not as sensitive as the simulation suggest.
It begins with they are simulating something that cannot happen, ECS, which is an abrupt doubling of the CO2 level.
TCR, while still higher than observed CO2 growth, is a much closer simulation.
Context for interpreting equilibrium climate sensitivity and transient climate response from the CMIP6 Earth system models
In the IPCC AR3, it was argued that TCR, rather than ECS, was a more relevant metric of model response to increasing CO2.
Meanwhile, the range of transient climate response (TCR, the surface temperature warming around the time of CO2 doubling in a 1% per year CO2 increase simulation) for the CMIP6 models of 1.7°C (1.3°C to 3.0°C) is only slightly larger than for the CMIP3 and CMIP5 models.
CO2 growth for the last 20 years has averaged 2.74 ppm per year, or about 0.7% lower than the 1% per year of TCR.
If TCR is the more relevant response, and the doubling warming of added CO2 is actually 1.7°C,
then the potential warming from added CO2 unlikely to cause many issues.
A much large factor is also caused from Human activity, but we cannot do anything about it.
Particulate aerosols started growing when we replaced animal power with energy extracted from coal.
they grew until in the 1970's we thought this dimming would cause the next ice age to come quicker.
Global changes, radically reduced aerosol emissions, and by 1985, then amount of available sunlight reaching
the ground started to increase. We basically reversed something that had taken 2 centuries to build up, in less than a few decades.
From Dimming to Brightening: Decadal Changes in Solar Radiation at Earth’s Surface
Over the period covered so far by BSRN (1992 to 2001), the decrease in earth reflectance
corresponds to an increase of 6 W m-2 in absorbed solar radiation by the globe (22)
This change in energy imbalance is more than ten times greater than the change from added greenhouse gases over the same time.
In short we have already seen most of what will happen, there is some capacity remaining, but only minimal.
The sea levels will continue to rise, until they do not, and we Humans will have to adapt, but nothing we
do or do not do will likely change the trend in sea level.