• We will be taking the server down at approximately 3:30 AM ET on Wednesday, 10/8/25. We have a hard drive that is in the early stages of failure and this is necessary to prevent data loss. We hope to be back up and running quickly, however this process could take some time.
  • This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Infant Could Be Delivered and Then ‘Physicians and the Mother’ Could Decide If It Lives

Hitler is somewhere smiling.These liberals have and will continue to slaughter more than he ever dreamed of.

And 'gulfman' continues to own the stupidest post of the day category.
Must come naturally, huh? I mean, you probably had to put effort into making such stupid statements when you started but now it's become automatic- another 'gulfman' post, another idiotic statement.
 
I have some experience with this....a nephew who was born non-viable but the doctors performed several surgeries to keep him alive. THEN they told the parents that he would most likely die in a few months anyway. The child lived over 3 years, but never developed mentally or physically. His weight topped out at 19 pounds, and he could see and grin and that was about it. The doctors played god. The hard right conservatives who want a say in this matter should at the least be willing to adopt these kids instead of warehousing them.

That is so tough for a family facing that situation. Somewhere we need to have a common sense approach to this.

As someone who works in the medical field I know we can keep you alive for a long time. There may not be any brain activity but if one wanted to you can keep the body alive.


It is the same thing when someone has a cardiac arrest. We go all out full force in trying to keep you alive. We break your ribs during CPR. Your body is being flailed like a rag doll but we want to do all we can to help you survive.

But at some point the code is called by a physician. We stop CPR and turn off everything and let that person have some dignity in passing away. There is no need to keep pounding his chest, sending high energy shocks to his chest, and pushing meds down his veins.


Nobody enjoys stopping the code. There is no celebration by the medical staff. We aren't butchering anyone.
 
Irrelevant. The new Baby Slaughter Law is not limited to BORN BABIES who are DYING.


See the left RUN. Now it isn't just "PARTIAL BIRTH ABORTION, it's MURDER AFTER DELIVERY....

Severe birth defects can occur in the third trimester, defects like only having a partial brain, for example. Calling this a "baby slaughter law" is an emotional response, not a rational one.

When you can get pregnant, carry a fetus to term, only to find that your new baby has a disorder that will make their life short and painful, then your opinion will have merit. It is supremely arrogant for you to judge a woman facing such a horror of a decision.
 
Because I saw this same baby killing thing yesterday. I asked a question, didn't know it was an agenda.

Anyone who disagrees with grokmaster's emotional views on this issue has "an agenda." Don't look for logic or reason here.
 
They would be TERMINATED. Read the transcript of the conversation, and, if you really want to be HORRIFED, go find the interview with the bill's main sponsor.

Terminated how?
 
Wasn't my thread... and Baby Butchering IS an AGENDA, in more than one DEMCOCRAT STATE LEGISLATURE.

Please explain how the rare instances of a late term catastrophic birth defect is an agenda. For what purpose? Who gains from such a procedure?
 
I know; it has to sting being relegated to trying tired., stale ALINSKY BULL**** to try to RUN FROM THE FACTS...but then, that's SOP for the DP left...

You list yourself as a libertarian, but your words state otherwise. No libertarian would advocate for government interference in someone's private life. You are not what you claim to be, therefore your credibility is severely lacking.
 
lol...And you guys pretend to call others Nazis. Your rhetoric is almost verbatim to Hitler.

I don't call people Nazi's... what is next?
 
Maybe you need to talk to the DNC...it is clearly near or at the top of their agenda.

The BABY DESERVES TO LIVE...**** what its mother feels is more "CONVENIENT".

These are DELIVERED BABIES.


What SAVAGES are the left anymore....

You are an uninformed fool on this issue of late term abortions. There is nothing convenient about it. Your cruelty towards women who find themselves facing such dire circumstances sickens me.

https://www.forbes.com/sites/taraha...ut-of-wombs-but-they-are-needed/#269b71f25cf8

Educate yourself, or stfu. I don't care which.
 
You are an uninformed fool on this issue of late term abortions. There is nothing convenient about it. Your cruelty towards women who find themselves facing such dire circumstances sickens me.

https://www.forbes.com/sites/taraha...ut-of-wombs-but-they-are-needed/#269b71f25cf8

Educate yourself, or stfu. I don't care which.


The WOMAN CHOSE TO END THE LIFE...the BABY is who has no choice.


There is NO MEDICAL REASON for a PARTIAL BIRTH ABORTION, and deciding to TERMINATE A BORN BABY IS MURDER. PERIOD.

It is YOU who are UNINFORMED and BARBARIC.
 
Apparently baby butchers are ok killing children provided they get to choose when to kill it and sell its body parts but they think children killed by a crazy person with a gun is not acceptable. At least school children can duck eh lefties?

Great, another moron with no clue about the real issue here. All emotion, no thought.
 
Great, another moron with no clue about the real issue here. All emotion, no thought.

Great another name calling DP leftist.

There is NO MEDICAL REASON for partial birth abortions.


They are FINANCIAL/EMOTIONAL CHOICES.


And, deciding whether or not a DELIVERED BABY should be KILLED, is MURDER...no matter how you try to "dress it up".
 
Links to YOUR anecdotes? It is a rare event for a severely damaged fetus to develop anywhere near normal. No parent should have this situation forced on them. They are out there in the thousands. Maybe
you should go to your nearest long term care facility and volunteer to help.

That would require him to actually DO something, instead of just typing in his extremely emotional and judgmental vitriol towards women he doesn't understand.
 
The WOMAN CHOSE TO END THE LIFE...the BABY is who has no choice.


There is NO MEDICAL REASON for a PARTIAL BIRTH ABORTION, and deciding to TERMINATE A BORN BABY IS MURDER. PERIOD.

It is YOU who are UNINFORMED and BARBARIC.

There are MANY resasons. Read the article, which BTW is NOT a left wing biased source. Actually read it, then get back to me and tell me again that there is never a medical reason for this.
 
And, deciding whether or not a DELIVERED BABY should be KILLED, is MURDER...no matter how you try to "dress it up".

what bill allows killing a delivered baby?

why do you keep running from this question?
:)
 
There are MANY resasons. Read the article, which BTW is NOT a left wing biased source. Actually read it, then get back to me and tell me again that there is never a medical reason for this.

Bull****. If she has carried to term there is NO MEDICAL REASON to start the birth process, and MURDER THE BABY.

Makeup some more BULL**** to cover for the Democrats SOULSICK BARBARISM....
 
Bull****. If she has carried to term there is NO MEDICAL REASON to start the birth process, and MURDER THE BABY.

Makeup some more BULL**** to cover for the Democrats SOULSICK BARBARISM....

what bill allows the birth process to happen then allows you to murder the baby? :)
 
Great, another moron with no clue about the real issue here. All emotion, no thought.

lol...enligjten me on the rules of your baby killing process then. Lets hear straight from you how you want to factually kill babies. Please leave emotion out and walk us through the SOP rev1 on your latest Baby Killing Procedures. It is a baby and you do want to kill it right?
 
Irrelevant. The new Baby Slaughter Law is not limited to BORN BABIES who are DYING.

So what is your personal testimony as to what you personally do for the unborn other than go on message boards and rant and rave ? be specific...
 
Severe birth defects can occur in the third trimester, defects like only having a partial brain, for example. Calling this a "baby slaughter law" is an emotional response, not a rational one.

When you can get pregnant, carry a fetus to term, only to find that your new baby has a disorder that will make their life short and painful, then your opinion will have merit. It is supremely arrogant for you to judge a woman facing such a horror of a decision.

oh we get it, have a baby, dont want it, ok to kill it. At least we can drop the whole fetuses arent humans so its ok argument. Its now factually baby killing.
 
Can I summarize?

The OP is massively misleading. And that's being nice.


And on a side note, I started a thread saying that Trump would never lose the support of his base if he just kept tweeting about abortion, the wall and Jesus. I think 3-4 people in this thread proved that perfectly for me.
 
Back
Top Bottom