Wow. If my goal was to do everything in my power to ruin the most people, cause the most damage, and eliminate as much of the economy as possible, I think you found our solution!
Let me explain to you, bit by bit, how incorrect everything you wrote is. :ssst:
Most people's retirements are wrapped up in 401K, IRAs and Pensions. All of which are generally in stocks of corporations. So you successfully ruined all those people,
The wording I presented made no mention of removing a corporation's ability to become recognized/legal. Collectivization is always an option, and stocks would not be effected, unless of course, you're only worried about executive salaries.
I have a serious longstanding issue with folks owning wealth they do not create. It's not the executive and the company's founder, nor is the government providing subsidies, who farms the wheat. As such, it's not the government or the executive who should own this wheat, it's the
farmer.
unless your goal was to make them more dependent on government programs, in which case you get a gold star.
I'm fully opposed to dependency on government programs. The government's only just use is to assure the necessities of life and equality on all levels.
Awww man. I wanted that star.
Then of course, most companies that grow to provide millions of jobs, and millions of products to our country, do so by becoming a corporation.
Workers' self management doesn't change this fact.
So you successfully ruined future jobs and wealth. Unless of course the goal was to make people more dependent on welfare and food stamps and other government programs, in which case you get yet another gold star
See above.
Lastly, the primary way a business becomes more open to the general public, in that you don't have to marry into the family to get a good job, is by having it turn into a corporation where shareholders have a say.
Workers' self management doesn't change this. Further, it gives the
employees say as well.
Michael Duke is CEO of walmart, and has absolutely no connection to the Walton family at all. If the WalMart had remained a solo proprietorship, which if corporations are eliminated they would have to, then the business would only be passed on to a member of the family. No non-Walton would ever have the business, or could ever be anything in management for Walmart.
I'm not advocating for elimination of corporations, merely the elimination of ones failing to abolish their top-down power structure. And kudos to Mike.
The whole "solo proprietorship" idea is a bit contrived...
Essentially, a corporation is one of the few ways an outsider can move up the ranks in a large company. But thanks to your new plan, you have virtually guaranteed that no one not a member of a wealthy family, will ever get into the higher levels of management,
First, that's not what my plan does. Second, your assertion that corporations would need to become a sole proprietorship is nonsense. It's still top down, so buh bye.
unless your goal was to protect the rich elite, in which case you get a third gold star.
I want to remove control from those "rich elite", we've already established that - it's just how cooperatives work. Damn, I keep missing these stars.
So let's recap. You wiped out peoples retirement savings. You killed off a large source of wealth, and jobs. You protected the rich and wealthy by eliminating a primary means of the middle class to move up. And you did all of this with a single law. Now that is an achievement to be proud of! You must be a Democrat, or a Leftist, or both. Even Maxine Waters would be proud of this plan.
So let's recap. I gave Americans control over their own means of sustenance. I improved job security. I eliminated the need for powerful folks at the top, giving the workers and the middle class more control. And I did all of this with a single law. Now that is an achievement to be proud of! I'm a Socialist, far left Democrat and Leftist. Anyone who uses that stuff between their ears would be proud of this plan.
