If you Believe in Science and Mathermatics

[roguenuke]

Listen to the end of the video.

What point of what video are you claiming she was under oath at this meeting, while this meeting was being conducted?

 

[Paradoxical]

Complete BS... They were not under oath.. stop lying..

What did she say at the end of the video?

 

[Paradoxical]

who knows, she is clearly not the sharpest tack in the box.

but as you know they were not allowed to put anyone under oath, you even attacked the guy that tried to make that happen.

Another person who testified in Philly said the same thing as her.

 

[Paradoxical]

She wasn't under oath there, at that "hearing". What exactly is in the affidavit she signed? According to a judge, it did not match what others claimed happened, nor the information we have about voting and the voting machines.

You mean others at CNN or at the DNC?

 

[GolfingChef]

Another person who testified in Philly said the same thing as her.

she probably her the Philly lady say it and choose to parrot her. That is why these things need to be done in a court of law and not as press conferences.

 

[Paradoxical]

What point of what video are you claiming she was under oath at this meeting, while this meeting was being conducted?

Signing an affidavit that says if you lie you face prison is just like being under oath.

 

[roguenuke]

Another person who testified in Philly said the same thing as her.

Post the video of that. Post the transcript. Post anything that shows they match.

But we know she lied about at least one thing that she stated there, and that was her social media. But even the GOP rep was highly skeptical about her claim about voter rolls.

 

[Paradoxical]

she probably her the Philly lady say it and choose to parrot her. That is why these things need to be done in a court of law and not as press conferences.

You're not very well read.

 

[Paradoxical]

Post the video of that. Post the transcript. Post anything that shows they match.

But we know she lied about at least one thing that she stated there, and that was her social media. But even the GOP rep was highly skeptical about her claim about voter rolls.

I don't have time to do your homework.....but.....lookey jhere

BREAKING: Dominion Software was Accessible to Far Left Indivisible Organizers on Election Night — An Obama-Linked Group That ENDORSED JOE BIDEN

On November 25th a 21-year-old electronic intelligence analyst under 305th Military Intelligence with experience gathering SAM missile system electronic intelligence signed a declaration of evidence for Attorney Sidney Powell in her investigation of the massive fraud in the 2020 presidential...

allenwest.club

 

[roguenuke]

Signing an affidavit that says if you lie you face prison is just like being under oath.

No, it isn't. Under oath, in a real hearing, someone else gets to ask you questions about what you saw, to determine if you could be wrong and see if you are lying or just mistaken. In fact, I'll reference the same movie as Giuliani here, My Cousin Vinnie. They show how people may make certain claims, and simply be wrong. That doesn't mean they would get in trouble, go to jail because their claims on paper are wrong. In fact, in order to go to jail for that, someone has to prove you deliberately lied, that you knew what you were saying was false.

She could simply be wrong. Maybe she's delusional. Maybe she really thinks she saw something she didn't. We also don't have her affidavit here to see how much it matches what she is claiming in the video she has. There is no comparison.

 

[roguenuke]

I don't have time to do your homework.....but.....lookey jhere

BREAKING: Dominion Software was Accessible to Far Left Indivisible Organizers on Election Night — An Obama-Linked Group That ENDORSED JOE BIDEN

On November 25th a 21-year-old electronic intelligence analyst under 305th Military Intelligence with experience gathering SAM missile system electronic intelligence signed a declaration of evidence for Attorney Sidney Powell in her investigation of the massive fraud in the 2020 presidential...

allenwest.club

You expect me to believe "Breaking news" from a site called "allenwest.club"?

Yep, not reliable source.

Flash News Corner - Bias and Credibility

QUESTIONABLE SOURCE A questionable source exhibits one or more of the following: extreme bias, consistent promotion of propaganda/conspiracies, poor or no

mediabiasfactcheck.com

Ret Col Phil Waldron is not breaking news. Please post his credentials.

 

[pamak]

Like Obama?

No, Obama did not separate children from their mothers.

 

[GolfingChef]

You're not very well read.

you say that a lot, it is your go to line.

it might mean some thing coming from someone other than you.

 

[Paradoxical]

No, Obama did not separate children from their mothers.

Who built the cages?

 

[Paradoxical]

you say that a lot, it is your go to line.

it might mean some thing coming from someone other than you.

I have to continually prove things to you, so you are not well read.

 

[GolfingChef]

I have to continually prove things to you, so you are not well read.

you have never proven anything to me. you are rarely right about anything and lack the basic intelligence to understand the purpose of wearing a mask in a pandemic

 

[pamak]

Who built the cages?

Not for kids coming together with their families. And those unaccompanied kids who were detained wre also released (all were issued a date to appear in court for their case).

In fact, Obama's policy with respect to illegals coming as a family was called " catch and release" which Trump "addressed" with his policy of separating kids from their families. This is from the White House

What You Need to Know About Catch and Release | The White House

WHAT: Our immigration system continues to encourage and allow an influx of aliens to illegally cross our borders and resettle in American communities. Poro

www.whitehouse.gov

What You Need to Know About Catch and Release
IMMIGRATION

Issued on: April 2, 2018

WHAT: Our immigration system continues to encourage and allow an influx of aliens to illegally cross our borders and resettle in American communities.

Porous borders, legal loopholes, and insufficient immigration enforcement resources allow aliens to illegally cross our borders and often prevent their removal once here. Waves of Unaccompanied Alien Children (UACs) and Family Units have been exploiting these weaknesses in our immigration system for years in order to enter and remain in the country.
Since fiscal year (FY) 2016, more than 107,000 UACs have been released into the interior of the United States. 2,895 UACs were released into the U.S. in February 2018 alone, bringing the total for FY 2018 thus far to 13,186. Once released, most UACs remain here by failing to either show up for court hearings or comply with removal orders. As a result, only 3.5 percent of UACs who are apprehended are eventually removed from the U.S. The surge of UACs entering and remaining in the U.S. is in addition to the more than 167,000 Family Units which were apprehended between FY 2016 and February 2018.

So, back to my initial point: The "zero tolerance" crowd should be dealt with zero tolerance when they break any law. Throw the book at the mother****ers

 

[Jay59]

There is no evidence. If there was, it could easily be presented to a judge. Yet judges are saying there is nothing there. And so is the AG, Bill Barr. But somehow you have access to this evidence that those who do this for a living have not yet found. Obviously you are wasting your time here. you should run to the nearest court and present the evidence that you have "seen".

Now you move the goalposts. First you say there is not any evidence. Now you are saying there isn't enough to take to court. No one ever said there was enough evidence to go to court. All that was ever claimed probable cause for an investigation.

Complete BS... They were not under oath.. stop lying..

Affidavits are under oath.

 

[Rawley]

Judge wants to see evidence for LA County’s restaurant dining ban

In denying an appeal of health orders, the judge told public health representatives to return with evidence justifying the policy banning outdoor dining.

www.dailynews.com

Judge orders LA County to come back to court this time with some actual scientific evidence that outdoor dining causes a specific risk of Covid transmission.

 

[GolfingChef]

Judge wants to see evidence for LA County’s restaurant dining ban

In denying an appeal of health orders, the judge told public health representatives to return with evidence justifying the policy banning outdoor dining.

www.dailynews.com

Judge orders LA County to come back to court this time with some actual scientific evidence that outdoor dining causes a specific risk of Covid transmission.

good to see. why they hell ban outdoor dining. it is like when the idiots here closed the bike trails...WTF?

 

[pamak]

Now you move the goalposts. First you say there is not any evidence. Now you are saying there isn't enough to take to court. No one ever said there was enough evidence to go to court. All that was ever claimed probable cause for an investigation.

I still have not seen any probable cause for an investigation based on the OP statistics. I am still waiting for the explanation regarding the sample issue we are discussing. Also, again, who is the person who wrote this thing? Finding on internet "studies" with dubious claims (and they remain dubious until I hear a reasonable explanation) which are written by anonymous authors do not establish a case for any probable cause. And also, I do not think that there is a requirement to have "probable cause" for opening an investigation and doing thing like recounts.

 

[GolfingChef]

I still have not seen any probable cause for an investigation based on the OP statistics. I am still waiting for the explanation regarding the sample issue we are discussing. Also, again, who is the person who wrote this thing? Finding on internet "studies" with dubious claims (and they remain dubious until I hear a reasonable explanation) which are written by anonymous sources do not establish a case for any probable cause. And also, I do not think that there is a requirement to have "probable cause" for doing thing like recounts.

The people who put out the data in the OP should have done further investigation before publishing. They did shoddy work and have not given anyone outside of Trumpians a reason too look deeper

 

[Paradoxical]

you have never proven anything to me. you are rarely right about anything and lack the basic intelligence to understand the purpose of wearing a mask in a pandemic

I have referred you to scientific studies. You chose to ignore them.

 

[Rawley]

good to see. why they hell ban outdoor dining. it is like when the idiots here closed the bike trails...WTF?

They are power hungry assholes who hide behind the chant of Science Science Science, Well this judge has called them out on it. About ****ing time. They should so the same with the schools.

 

[prometeus]

I have referred you to scientific studies.

No doubt those were the basis of your moronic predictions too.