• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
  • Welcome to our archives. No new posts are allowed here.

If you Believe in Science and Mathermatics

I mentioned many times that hospital resources are being used up at a high clip because epidemiologists demand that hospital resources be used at a high clip to fight this pandemic. A sort of self-fulfilling prophecy.on the psrt of epidemiologists.
Apparently you don't have any idea what epidemiologists do.... Pretty funny really.
 
Give examples where I:
Am authoritarian to anyone who disagrees with me.
Am authoritarian to anyone who questions me. I mean, you of all people should know that an authoritarian's main reason to shut out dissenting opinions is to shut out dissenting opinions. :rolleyes:
Answer my questions in the post first.
 
You made up definition for authoritarianism doesn't make my usage of authoritarianism false.
I didnt make 'em up...I just proved yours wrong. Several times. 😄

"authoritarian: of, relating to, or favoring blind submission to authority"


"authoritarian: demanding that people obey completely and refusing to allow them freedom to act as they wish."


post 855 for reference 😄
 
To say “zero evidence” is the height of arrogance.
This topic has ZERO evidence of fraud. You can't prove fraud with "statistical anomalies". It is a curiosity at best. Most likely explained by the preponderance of mail-in votes for Biden and we already know why that happened. The one term mistake and covid caused that.
 
Twenty percent of the US's population is elderly...the retired. That's 20% of approx. 330 million. That's 66 million, approximately.
Now add the cancer survivors, those with compromised immune system (like me), the diabetics, those with chronic heart or lung or kidney or liver disease, etc. and you add another 30-50 million or so.

And how many workers have to join them in quarantine? 20 million for 100 million in quarantine perhaps? If you put these people in facilities that are quarantined, you have to also force the workers who deal with them daily, and they will have to deal with them daily, into quarantine or it won't work. You'd just be putting people in conditions where an outbreak from an infected worker spreads like wildfire. So the workers have to leave their families, if they have them. Etc.....

There's a reason no government tried this, and it's because they thought it out beyond the sharpie on a bar napkin talking point all the way to the very first complication - how to deliver services to these quarantined people for months...
 
You reverse quarantine the elderly by age and not by testing.:rolleyes: You test those with multi-comorbidities (which is lot less of an amount of people than the elderly) before you reverse quarantine them.

DUH! :rolleyes: You have to test ALL OF THEM, including medical staff, etc. BEFORE interning them all together. Otherwise you will introduce the virus to the facility and everyone will end up getting it.

Jeebus, Mary, and Joe Cocker! Again...you demonstrate zero understanding of epidemiology AT ALL and you criticize those professionals????
 
I mentioned many times that hospital resources are being used up at a high clip because epidemiologists demand that hospital resources be used at a high clip to fight this pandemic. A sort of self-fulfilling prophecy.on the psrt of epidemiologists.
Are you suggesting that medical staff are using more 'hospital resources' than are needed to treat patients? Are using them 'improperly?'

If so, source that. Otherwise it's pure BS you made up.

The links proved that other hospital resources, like medical staff and beds are also overwhelmed and there arent enough. What 'high clip' are they being improperly used at? Please explain?

And where do medical staff get more hours in the day?
 
Then it's the epidemiologists who've failed to learn.
You have yet to prove that. Go ahead.

You havent proven them wrong yet. You havent even demonstrated that you understand their jobs, period.
 
There was no evidence of fraud in the Trump campaign investigation after the 2016 election by either the FBI nor by Mueller but most applauded that investigation. There was no evidence of fraud in the impeachment of Trump by the house over the Zelensky phone call but most applauded that investigation.:rolleyes:

I wonder if you're more concerned with your candidate winning (and hurting the opposing candidate) than having free and fair elections in America?
I want the largest number of citizens possible to vote, and I want that vote to be as accurate as possible.

As an aside, I dislike the winner take all system most areas of the USA use for elections.
I'd prefer a ranked choice system.
But digression over.

There is no evidence that any fraud significant enough to change the election results occurred in 2020.

None.

I know people are claiming there is, but every time I break down and go look at something which is claimed to be evidence, it's not.
All those testimonies and affidavits are either lies or claim completely normal and legal behavior as evidence of fraud.
 
Ah. Many accuse the Donald of being authoritarian or even fascist. Was the Donald confused as to what he could do as an authoritarian or fascist?...Because, you see, a true authoritarian or fascist wouldn't let a little thing like the law keep them from doing what was in their personal interests.
The one term mistake never did anything that was not in his personal interests. He also flouted our laws at will. That's why so many of his EO's were thrown out by the courts. You give him far too much credit for our Govts. checks and balances which thwarted his authoritarian bent on many occasions. He did get impeached too if you remember and the Senate Republicans told us that it was up to the voters to decide if he was guilty. We did decide. Guilty as charged.
 
Something will get done after Joe Biden and Kamala Harris are sworn in if Democrats win both Georgia races. That would mean Republicans have to get the Senate back in 2022 - and they would still have a Democratic president to work with.
Biden’s crew is all about ending fracking, loving the Paris accords where we cut CO2 output of our factories by moving industry back to China, the zero-sum game of “equality” and equity, and more illegals to keep wages down, and H2B slaves to keep Silicon Valley happy.
He’s got some real characters in his cabinet, a few bright bulbs but mostly 90 watters helping Calif Guv Newsom dump his liabilities.
 
Biden’s crew is all about ending fracking, loving the Paris accords where we cut CO2 output of our factories by moving industry back to China, the zero-sum game of “equality” and equity, and more illegals to keep wages down, and H2B slaves to keep Silicon Valley happy.

He’s got some real characters in his cabinet, a few bright bulbs but mostly 90 watters helping Calif Guv Newsom dump his liabilities.

My message went way over your head. I was saying more will get done with a Democratic Senate than a Republican Senate because a Democrat is in the White House.

You also have no idea what Joe Biden really wants to do with industry and illegal immigrants.
 
How many times have I answered that I use logic, inference and deduction to come up with my theories? To you directly, is the count up to 10?
A fact doesn't have to bite you on the ass to be considered a fact, ya know. Or do you know?
You making this claim does not make it show and your posts reflect the actual evidence to either support or refute this claim.
 
but not from lack of trying.
Mebe the fact that Trump allowed each state to devise their own protocol to fight Covid was an indication that Trump was an authoritarian or fascist?:ROFLMAO:
 
Yes, you've "written" that but you havent "demonstrated" that in any of your posts.

Do you understand the distinction?
You are authoritarian and any thought or idea that is against your personal beliefs must be eliminated....You understand this? I understand this.
 
Last edited:
I'm not whining here. I'm explaining why you are wrong.
The whole narrative by authoritarian progressives over the constitutional election of Trump as president in the 2016 election was that the Trump election was invalid...That the popular vote was more for Hillary than Trump, for example. Authoritarian progressives spent the entirety of the Trump presidency claiming that the Trump presidency was invalid...Authoritarian progressives 'resisted'.
 
You making this claim does not make it show and your posts reflect the actual evidence to either support or refute this claim.
it's not my fault that you aren't able to grasp abstract thinking concepts like logic, deduction and inference.:rolleyes:
 
The whole narrative by authoritarian progressives over the constitutional election of Trump as president in the 2016 election was that the Trump election was invalid...
this is a strawman. nobody said it was invalid.
That the popular vote was more for Hillary than Trump, for example.
which is a demonstrable fact.
Authoritarian progressives spent the entirety of the Trump presidency claiming that the Trump presidency was invalid...Authoritarian progressives 'resisted'.
strawman. nobody claimed this.
 
You are authoritarian and any thought or idea that is against your personal beliefs must be eliminated....You understand this? I understand this.
LMAO, I understand just fine...I understand that I have constantly asked you to prove your claims. And I understand you have constantly failed. I understand that this 'constant' request means that I do not want to eliminate your personal beliefs, but see you prove them. Which again, you have failed. I understand that if you had valid support for your personal beliefs, there'd be no reason to eliminate them.

I also understand that you now understand that you have failed to make any of your arguments on the CV19 issue. However I also understand that this is as close to admitting it as you will get.

And lastly, I understand that you still cannot use the word 'authoritarian' properly. 😆
 
You have it backward. The population mean is used as a statistic to test the samples. It's like using 50% as the statistic when you test to see if a coin tosses fairly.

So, back to what I was saying in the past because we have some updates

But the sample is not random!

LOLOL

This is because counties reported first mostly their "heads" (in person voting which favored Trump) and then reported mostly their "tales" (mail in ballots which favored Biden), and then one looks at the late "samples" (updates) of the mail in ballots (and they were late because they came from big counties which also favored Biden) and tries to argue that it should reflect the population.


One of my favorite youtube channel by a legit mathematician addressed made the same basic point starting at around 7:30



So, after more than 30 years of learn some stats at the university level, I can still figure out what Trump minions who file lawsuits and their "experts" cannot grasp
 
Back
Top Bottom