I've seen nothing to that effect. Perhaps you would like to point me to the specific page numbers. Your word isn't worth squat to me without a citation from the bill itself.
I will check. The previous versions of the bill had a national insurance exchange. Perhaps it changed to state-based exchanges recently.
Let me save you the trouble: the exchanges are nothing more than joint risk pools that allow you to purchase insurance in your own state for slightly less.
There is no provision to open purchase of insurance policies across state lines.
The entire premise of this being "interstate commerce" is false.
If enough Republicans are elected into office with the intent to overturn Obama's socialist health care reform, I believe it can and will be overturned. The taxes will start immediately, but the "benefits" of ObamaCare do not begin until 2013. So, theoretically, the country has about three years to stop socialism before the entitlements begin and it becomes too late to kill the bill. Until the entitlements actually begin, it can be overturned if enough people vote politicians into office with the intent to stop socialism.
I will check. The previous versions of the bill had a national insurance exchange. Perhaps it changed to state-based exchanges recently.
FactCheck.org wrote, “The Ryan/Coburn bill and the Wyden/Bennett bill, which has four other Republican cosponsors, both create state-based insurance exchanges that would sell coverage that meets certain standards, just like the Senate-passed Democratic bill. (The House-passed bill sets up a national exchange, instead of state-based exchanges.)
The original House bill contained a NATIONAL exchange that allowed for buying policies across state lines. I dont' know if this law still does that, but the old one clearly involved interstate commerce.
The house bill had a national exchange, the enacted bill contains state exchanges.
I think those who voted "yes" are just wishful at this point. The government has never gotten it's hands out of anything after it gets in.
I think those who voted "yes" are just wishful at this point. The government has never gotten it's hands out of anything after it gets in.
It doesn't usually get in with such a tight party-line vote in such a big way, though. Actually, I'm pretty sure it's never happened before now.
But repealing it will be hard. I think they will at least significantly change it.
I read no such thing in the original house bill either.
The premise that the Fed can mandate a personal responsibility to buy insurance based on the interstate commerce clause is FALSE.
Scrap the whole damned thing and start over. without the mandatory coverage and other **** like that!
I decided to bump this poll seeing how there is another news story on the issue instead of just making another poll.
http://www.debatepolitics.com/breaking-news/71709-boehner-gop-repeal-health-care-law.html
Well what are they going to replace it with?
In 2000 reducing health costs through private insurance was a part of the Republican platform. That plan did not quite work out IMHO.
Hopefully it will be declared Unconstitutional before the GOP can cut it down
why would that ever happen? how is it unconstitutional and like I said I doubt the GOP will be cutting anything down because most agree with 70+ or it
popularity is not the same as being constitutional. sadly dem justices in the 1930's forgot that fact.
If you were right-Roe v Wade was wrong since most states banned abortion
Listening to some of the talk show host they seem to be under the impression that this will cost a lot of democrats their seats and somehow the republicans will repeal this. So I decided to ask ask this question-
If republicans get a significant majority will they repeal Obama health care reform?
I say no. I think a lot of these politicians say one thing and do another for votes.
I am impressed that the wealthy conservatives care not a hoot about their less fortunate fellow Americans, the "masses".If enough Republicans are elected into office with the intent to overturn Obama's socialist health care reform, I believe it can and will be overturned. The taxes will start immediately, but the "benefits" of ObamaCare do not begin until 2013. So, theoretically, the country has about three years to stop socialism before the entitlements begin and it becomes too late to kill the bill. Until the entitlements actually begin, it can be overturned if enough people vote politicians into office with the intent to stop socialism.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?