Ummm...Should one man with nukes be able to hold the whole world hostage? What if he decides to invade poland, does the whole nuke thing just go out the window because poland is a part of nato?
At what point is it time to stop him?
Naive....its is not a matter of balls.Its a matter of process.Ummm...
First you need some leaders who have balls.
First you need proof and it is lacking so far .
All that we have is US inspired Fake News .
Interesting tit bit re. the mass graves they found caused by Ukey killing from incursions into Donbass villages
Laughable...you can't do better than parroting some Putin line?First you need proof and it is lacking so far .
All that we have is US inspired Fake News .
Interesting tit bit re. the mass graves they found caused by Ukey killing from incursions into Donbass villages
Should one man with nukes be able to hold the whole world hostage? What if he decides to invade poland, does the whole nuke thing just go out the window because poland is a part of nato?
At what point is it time to stop him?
Ask the UK, France and Germany. It's in their backyards and they have to funds to fight if they want. The USA doesn't need to fight this war.Should one man with nukes be able to hold the whole world hostage? What if he decides to invade poland, does the whole nuke thing just go out the window because poland is a part of nato?
At what point is it time to stop him?
Should one man with nukes be able to hold the whole world hostage? What if he decides to invade poland, does the whole nuke thing just go out the window because poland is a part of nato?
At what point is it time to stop him?
Poland is a NATO treaty member. The only country that has ever invoked Article 5 of the NATO charter after being attacked is....the United States. Are you suggesting that having use the Charter for its benefit the US then walk out on its obligation to another NATO member?Ask the UK, France and Germany. It's in their backyards and they have to funds to fight if they want. The USA doesn't need to fight this war.
You can't be serious? Do you watch the news?What determines that Russia/Putin has committed war crimes that justify exactly what military response? What officially constitutes "most of the world", or a representation of such?
Yes and no. We shouldn't do it alone, but we should care about this war and do what we can.Ask the UK, France and Germany. It's in their backyards and they have to funds to fight if they want. The USA doesn't need to fight this war.
It's a pretty good analogy, and yes it took several years, until he was voted out in 2000.How many years was it before the war criminals in Serbia were arrested for their war crimes? It took a while, if I recall correctly; and they didn't even have nukes.
Are our NATO members fighting a war? If they do, we should aid them. Currently, they aren't, yet people are clamoring for the US to go over there and fight FOR them not WITH them.Poland is a NATO treaty member. The only country that has ever invoked Article 5 of the NATO charter after being attacked is....the United States. Are you suggesting that having use the Charter for its benefit the US then walk out on its obligation to another NATO member?
They have not to this point been attacked. Why don't you do yourself a favor and read the NATO charter. It isn't that long.Are our NATO members fighting a war? If they do, we should aid them. Currently, they aren't, yet people are clamoring for the US to go over there and fight FOR them not WITH them.
I say we are. Unless our NATO members actually get into a hot war with Russia, we should stay out of direct military action against Russia.Yes and no. We shouldn't do it alone, but we should care about this war and do what we can.
Are our NATO members fighting a war? If they do, we should aid them. Currently, they aren't, yet people are clamoring for the US to go over there and fight FOR them not WITH them.
Of course.I say we are. Unless our NATO members actually get into a hot war with Russia, we should stay out of direct military action against Russia.
Please show us where in the NATO charter that states the USA should fight for any and all NATO members despite their lack of action? No. We fight with our members, not for them.They have not to this point been attacked. Why don't you do yourself a favor and read the NATO charter. It isn't that long.
.... the title of the thread suggests that the US acts. Do you know what thread you're replying to?Nah, there is no talk of the US going to war without its European allies. Not sure where you're getting this stuff. Sounds a little odd and made-up- like propaganda or something.
NATO members respond if a member nation is attacked and invokes Article 5 of the charter. Again READ THE DOCUMENT.Please show us where in the NATO charter that states the USA should fight for any and all NATO members despite their lack of action? No. We fight with our members, not for them.
Should one man with nukes be able to hold the whole world hostage? What if he decides to invade poland, does the whole nuke thing just go out the window because poland is a part of nato?
At what point is it time to stop him?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?