If Iran Attacks Targets in USA, Should Republicans Impeach & Remove Trump?

[MamboDervish]

Republicans ahould have impeached him long before now. But they lost their integrity and manhood in 2016 and never regained them.

Indeed. Try as I might, I can't recall the day I first woke up and suddenly realized the entire GOP seems to have been neutered. Ironically, the only Republicans on the congressional floor who can still sing tenor are Boebert and Greene. They should both be tested for testosterone levels. The rest of the obsequious Republican castrati all seem to be harmonizing for Trump somewhere up in the Soprano range.

 

[Lycanthrope]

Indeed. Try as I might, I can't recall the day I first woke up and suddenly realized the entire GOP seems to have been neutered. Ironically, the only Republicans on the congressional floor who can still sing tenor are Boebert and Greene. They should both be tested for testosterone levels. The rest of the obsequious Republican castrati all seem to be harmonizing for Trump somewhere up in the Soprano range.

"Obsequious Republican castrati" -

 

[Simon W. Moon]

Are you actually ignorant of the reality that when someone's in one of these roles they seek advice.

No.
That is why I did not question the value of seeking advice the way you questioned the value of experience.

Experience doesn't make you a good decision maker.
Experience doesn't equal competence.

that's some sad, sad arguing there.
that is a desperate, desperate argument

Trump has backed you into a corner of having to argue that a lack of professional experience is somehow preferrable

In no world is inexperience preferred to experience when it comes to on the job performance.


Inexperience is more likely to lead to bad decisions than experience

Inexperience is more likely to lead to poor performance than practice

I'm sorry that you're so bigoted about this.

Are you really sad that rational people can acknowledge that experience is preferrable to inexperience when it comes to on the job performance?

 

[Simon W. Moon]

If I was a new auditor and I was inexperienced I would think council from some that are I've been a young person and had to gain experience that's the way you do it

Which twenty-something on Doge had the experience working in the SSA to do the counselling you imagine?​

 

[Fletch]

Not surprised that you lack an awareness of the relationship between the USA and Russia in the 20th and 21st century.



Having a "biggest obstacle" necessarily implies that there are other obstacles.
So, you comment isn't actually a point.

Im well aware of that relationship. But that doesnt mean I can make sense out of senseless posts. If you have a point to make, maybe you could learn to write more clearly.

 

[CaughtInThe]

 

[CLAX1911]

Which twenty-something on Doge had the experience working in the SSA to do the counselling you imagine?​

The fact that they didn't have experience made them qualified. Ssa has been a problem for decades the people in charge of it have screwed the pooch

 

[Simon W. Moon]

Im well aware of that relationship. But that doesnt mean I can make sense out of senseless posts. If you have a point to make, maybe you could learn to write more clearly.

I will post my comment here again with context to help you out.

Why would Putin be laughing? His ally Iran is getting its ass kicked just like he is.

because the USA is no longer an obstacle to his ambitions, probably

Which part of my post above is unclear to you?

 

[Simon W. Moon]

The fact that they didn't have experience made them qualified. Ssa has been a problem for decades the people in charge of it have screwed the pooch

lol

Did you keep a straight face when you posted this?​

​

This is some of the stupidest shit ever. So, Shirley, it MUST be a joke, yes?​

Does the lack of experience make them qualified to do your job too?
ROFLMAO

 

[Fletch]

I will post my comment here again with context to help you out.




Which part of my post above is unclear to you?

Whats clear is your determination to make everything about Trump. Other than that your post still says nothing.

 

[ModerationNow!]

Why exactly would Donald Trump be blamed for an attack on us by a foreign country? Donald Trump wasn't the one who sent missiles against Iran. That was Israel, who therefore are 100% to blame for retaliatory attacks by Iran. That's logical. But since when do the left want the US to do more middle eastern "regime changing" wars? That's basically what you're calling for by blaming Trump for potential attacks on American interests by a foreign country who were attacked by someone else.

By now it should be fairly clear that Trump avoided getting us into more wars. Remember how he wanted to pull us out of Syria during his first presidency, but the deep state & the "news" media started incessantly whining about it! If you looked at the map of land that we controlled, it was blatantly obvious that they had our troops occupying Syria's primary oil drilling areas, along with the crude oil transportation corridor(train tracks etc), and the port where their oil is shipped out!

So it looked like we were basically stealing their oil, moving it to the ports, then shipping it elsewhere! Gee, I wonder who's pockets were being lined by all that stolen oil $$$? In light of that, it becomes obvious why they wanted us to remain in Syria.

Also, remember how Afghanistan suddenly became the world's primary opium poppy and heroin production center within about a year of us defeating the Taliban(who'd outlawed poppy growing). Remember the footage of US soldiers patrolling rural areas of Afghanistan while being flanked on both sides by enormous opium poppy fields, which didn't exist a year earlier?

 

[Simon W. Moon]

Whats clear is your determination to make everything about Trump. Other than that your post still says nothing.

Since you said you failed to understand my post,​

how can your assessment of its content be trusted?​

sounds like you're talking out your ass about something you admittedly don't understand

 

[ElChupacabra]

Voted "no" because I don't think that's an impeachable offense. This logic would make all sorts of US presidents impeachable because the policy in the Middle East over the decades has led to all sorts of consequences, some of which are blowback against the US.

 

[stealthycat]

Subject line says it all, we were not obligated to start a war with Iran.
Now, if a future September 11th style attack occurs on our shores with significant civilian casualties, Trump owns this.

so you want us to nuke Iran and eliminate the chances they'd attack us, right ?

 

[ModerationNow!]

Whats clear is your determination to make everything about Trump. Other than that your post still says nothing.

Dude, I had a headache yesterday, and my great uncle died of multiple sclerosis in the 70s. Then I had a flat tire in 2021. I blame the ee-vil orange man for it all!

 

[ModerationNow!]

so you want us to nuke Iran and eliminate the chances they'd attack us, right ?

I'm willing to bet every penny my descendants ever make for the next 1,000 years that you wouldn't have blamed ANY Democrat president under the exact same circumstances.

Then again, if the Democrats and UN(and EU, WEF, Open Society Foundation etc) manage to fulfill their goal of trafficking 50-100 million more "asylum seekers"(i.e. 90% illegal immigrant single male economic migrants) into the country and grant them amnesty soon after, the Dems will achieve their permanent power majority and turn the US, Mexico and Canada into a communist economic zone run by mega-hedge funds like BlackRock and Vanguard.

Then the majority of citizens will become poor and oppressed, as always happens under socialism/communism.

 

[CLAX1911]

lol

Did you keep a straight face when you posted this?​

​

This is some of the stupidest shit ever. So, Shirley, it MUST be a joke, yes?​

Does the lack of experience make them qualified to do your job too?
ROFLMAO

Well of experienced means experience it being corrupt then yes.

 

[CLAX1911]

I will post my comment here again with context to help you out.




Which part of my post above is unclear to you?

. The lie

 

[Simon W. Moon]

Well of experienced means experience it being corrupt then yes.

WHY THE **** WOULD IT MEAN THAT?

In the context of job performance, why the **** would you think that experience means means experience with being corrupt?​

​

Are you really so desperate to pretend you have a point?​

 

[Simon W. Moon]

. The lie

Are you quite sure @Fletch needs you to explain his thinking?

'cause it seems like you ****ed up the explanation.

Maybe send your mind reading machine back to the shop

 

[CLAX1911]

WHY THE **** WOULD IT MEAN THAT?

In the context of job performance, why the **** would you think that experience means means experience with being corrupt?​

​

Are you really so desperate to seem like you have a point?​

I think my points pretty solid you can clutch your pearls all you want I think it's kind of funny.

 

[ModerationNow!]

Voted "no" because I don't think that's an impeachable offense. This logic would make all sorts of US presidents impeachable because the policy in the Middle East over the decades has led to all sorts of consequences, some of which are blowback against the US.

Obviously you haven't yet learned that it's an impeachable offense when a republican breathes in the wrong direction! But it's definitely NOT an impeachable offense for Democrats to intentionally plan and coordinate the trafficking of 10+ million single male illegal immigrant economic migrants into the country for the express purpose of using them to gain more power by counting them in the census to increase the number of democrat congresspeople.

Then later granting them amnesty, so as to further undermine democracy by bribing them with tax dollars to vote for Democrats in presidential and senatorial elections!

 

[Simon W. Moon]

I think my points pretty solid...

You point is what exactly?

Hiring experienced personnel to perform a job is a bad idea because experienced personnel are corrupt?

 

[CLAX1911]

Are you quite sure @Fletch needs you to explain his thinking?

'cause it seems like you ****ed up the explanation.

Maybe send your mind reading machine back to the shop

This is disjointed

 

[CLAX1911]

You point is what exactly?

That sometimes experience isn't a good thing

Hiring experienced personnel to perform a job is a bad idea because experienced personnel are corrupt?

Occasionally. If the experience is in how to be corrupt then yeah it's a bad thing.

I'll stand by that too