George_Washington said:
I really don't think you can compare someone's race to their sexual orientation. They're too different things. A person can't help his or her race but it's still in debate as to whether people are born gay or rather just certain circumstances make them that way. Ann Heche for example thought she was gay and now she says she's straight. So some people might just get confused for whatever reason. I'm not saying that's morally wrong or anything. I'm just saying that the comparison between race and lifestyle is rather weak.
Well of they were the exactly the same than it wouldn't be a metaphor!
Dude, it's true, some believe that whether or not you're gay is a choice (which seems illogical, because I don't recall ever choosing to like girls), or a result of somethings that happened while you were growing up (which seems like it could make sense), or just how you are (which also seems like it makes sense). But you should notice that the only aspect that required actual choice seems to be entirely unlikely.
But that's all beside the point, because whether or not someone is gay falls into the category of "Doesn't concern you how they got that way", or "It doesn't matter", if you will, which is an aspect it shares with race.
I have known a lot of kids who've been raised by gay parents, and I'm telling you that having two loving parents has never EVER ****ed a kid up.
Also, I'm not sure if you ever made the argument about kids getting picked on, but I can offer a little bit of insight, since I was a bully up until high school.
Of course a kid would get beaten up because of having gay parents, at least considering that the bully wasn't expressly taught that homosexuality was ok (which I was when I was young). I beat up kids for every reason imaginable. I beat up kids for being too short, or having voice that I didn't like, or looking at me the wrong way, or being jewish or pakistani, for being chinese and near my rocking horse, everything. That's how the mind of a bully works, if you don't like something, or you don't understand something, you beat it up. So thus this argument is "We shouldn't allow anything that could possibly be disliked or not understood by an unstable 7 year old.", which I feel that we can agree is ridiculous.
Some research might show that, yes. But we shouldn't just dismiss research that might prove the contrary and simply label them as, "bigots".
No, but that is also not to say that we shouldn't question the source. Also, we should compare it to legal precedent, I mean, does having gay parents **** a kid up worse than having only one parent, or being raised by zhis grandparents, or to the standard that we deny adoption or take away children from straight people.