• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

If David Duke were sued, should he only get a white judge?

If David Duke were sued, should he only get a white judge?


  • Total voters
    27
Remind me again, what part of the Trump University fraud allegations.....have to do with US Hispanic socioeconomic issues?

1. Trump University is a scam.
2. Trump has a controlling interest in the university.
3. Trump wants to build a wall with Mexico, keeping out illegal Mexican immigrants (other illegal immigrants? Whatevs.)
4. Judge Curiel's parents emigrated to the United States, meaning Curiel has Mexican lineage.
5. Therefore, Trump believes that Curiel would be sympathetic to illegal Mexican immigrants and would therefore oppose said wall, despite having no good reason to believe this.
6. Judge Curiel, it should be reminded, is a naturally born American citizen.
7. Curiel belongs to La Raza Lawyers of Sacramento.
8. This institution shares the words "La Raza" with the reknowned "La Raza Counsil" believed by some to be pro-illegal immigrant. Most people believe these two institutions are one and the same.
9. "La Raza" means "The race" or "The people," therefore it's racist.
10. Therefore Curiel is racist.
11. Therefore Curiel is not fit to sit on the trial for Trump University.

Going by Trump's logic, only a white Christian male can preside over the trial because that may well be the one remaining demographic he hasn't insulted by now.
 
Last edited:
1. Trump University is a scam.
Wrong. That is an unproven allegation. The vast majority of those who attended are not complaining.


4. Judge Curiel's parents emigrated to the United States, meaning Curiel has Mexican lineage.
Did they do so legally or illegally? Not that it matters.
As they were citizens of Mexico, so would their children. That would make the Judge a Mexican citizen as well.


6. Judge Curiel, it should be reminded, is a naturally born American citizen.
The Framers of the 14th were clear in their intent, if he was born to illegals he is not a NBC.


5. Therefore, Trump believes that Curiel would be sympathetic to illegal Mexican immigrants ...
Would be? Trump is correct if this is his belief.
The Judge is sympathetic and supports illegals, not only in action (Part of a committee who granted an illegal a scholarship.), but also by membership in groups which are.
One such Association to which the Judge belongs, the Hispanic National Bar Association, is specifically and vocally oppositional to Trump and his interests.

This is enough to give the appearance of bias.
 
Wrong. That is an unproven allegation. The vast majority of those who attended are not complaining.

Proven, and the reviews of the graduates are worthless.

Did they do so legally or illegally? Not that it matters.

So why did you ask?

As they were citizens of Mexico, so would their children. That would make the Judge a Mexican citizen as well.

So that's Mexico's rule. So what?
The Framers of the 14th were clear in their intent, if he was born to illegals he is not a NBC.

Is he legally a natural born citizen or not?

Would be? Trump is correct if this is his belief.
The Judge is sympathetic and supports illegals, not only in action (Part of a committee who granted an illegal a scholarship.), but also by membership in groups which are.
One such Association to which the Judge belongs, the Hispanic National Bar Association, is specifically and vocally oppositional to Trump and his interests.

This is enough to give the appearance of bias.

Unless you have Curiel's own direct thoughts and actions on the matter, that is irrelevant speculation and "six degrees of Kevin Bacon."
 
Proven, and the reviews of the graduates are worthless.
Wow! You start off your reply with the first word being a lie.
That only indicates that nothing else you have to say is of import.


So why did you ask?
To make the point very clear to you.
He is also a Mexican.


So that's Mexico's rule. So what?
Irrelevant.
It makes him a Mexican.


Is he legally a natural born citizen or not?
Unless they were here legally, under their intent, he is not.


Unless you have Curiel's own direct thoughts and actions on the matter, that is irrelevant speculation and "six degrees of Kevin Bacon."
Wrong.
A perception is all that is required, not actual proof of bias.
 
Donald Trump claims that the fact that the judge in Trump University case is of Mexican descent, he is incapable of being fair to him as a judge. So, if David Duke were sued, should he only get a white judge?

Donald Teump is a pathetic, whinny, spoiled brat.

He rips people off and desperately tried to use the judge's background as an excuse.

What a loser.
 
Back
Top Bottom