- Joined
- Jun 12, 2014
- Messages
- 11,283
- Reaction score
- 6,958
- Location
- https://www.debatepolitics.com
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Communist
People will sure take their pleasures in odd ways.
It vibrates, too.
People will sure take their pleasures in odd ways.
Sorry. That does not justify assault. Your disagreement to that is irrelevant.
Incorrect. There you go again. It has nothing to do with either. It has to do with their dishonesty in a relationship.
There are very few conditions which justify assaulting someone. Self defense would be at the top of the list, a few others might fly in a jury trial and result in an acquittal--assaulting someone who sexually molested your child, for example. There is no justification for assaulting someone who "tricked" you into thinking they were a woman or man. There may be grounds to sue them though.
Incorrect. The individual has no duty to date or not date anyone. All they have a duty to do is inform and then let the other decide if they are interested or not.
Incorrect. An MTF who is NOT gay can attempt to date anyone they want. It is not YOUR place to make these kinds of determinations for anyone else. You have NO say in those kinds of things. It IS the responsibility of the MTF to inform the man that they are an MTF, then allowing that person to make an informed decision.
I hope this correction in both your logic and in your understanding of how pertinent your opinion is to anyone else, is noted.
Ah, Henrin providing us with more examples of his ignorance on this topic. Firstly, Renae's comment was referring to one's intent to be disrespectful to another. You have already CLEARLY indicated on many occasions that you will intentionally be disrepectful to a transsexual... and yes, your using DNA to justify your disrepect doesn't alter the fact that it IS disrespect. Of course, you are quite OK with being disrespectful because of your inflexible agenda, so other than pointing it out, there is no purpose really discussing it with you. Secondly, the 'hormonal imbalance" is intentionally caused to TREAT the GDD caused by the biological inconsistency that is created by transsexuality. This is a complete different issue than what happens in the scenario you presented, rendering, as usual, your point irrelevant.
You don't get to tell me what justifies assault. It is my opinion that being tricked into sex with someone that is a man is grounds to beat their ass and I see nothing you said that displaces that belief.
So you would be completely calm if found out you were tricked into sex with a man? Hmmm..
Then in most legal systems you have already committed assault.
I would chalk it up to experience and move on.
So you wouldn't feel violated or anything like that?
Why would I? I don't get why you would take it so personally? Explain it to me.
Why would I not take it extremely personally is the better question.
I don't know. I can't answer that for you, all I'm trying to do is understand why you would?
Tell me why I shouldn't take it extremely personally.
It's cool. I am not a mind reader so I'll just leave it.
So you would be completely calm if found out you were tricked into sex with a man? Hmmm..
I'd say that having a penis precludes someone from being a woman. But, I am apparently stuck in the 20th century. :lol:
You don't get to tell me what justifies assault. It is my opinion that being tricked into sex with someone that is a man is grounds to beat their ass and I see nothing you said that displaces that belief.
Incorrect. An MTF who is NOT gay can attempt to date anyone they want. It is not YOUR place to make these kinds of determinations for anyone else. You have NO say in those kinds of things. It IS the responsibility of the MTF to inform the man that they are an MTF, then allowing that person to make an informed decision.
I hope this correction in both your logic and in your understanding of how pertinent your opinion is to anyone else, is noted.
I would not be surprised to find a jury acquitting the assailant who was tricked into a homosexual act by a man pretending to be female. If the judge lets in all the evidence, that is.
I wouldn't convict unless they were beat to death. If it was a well deserved beating the judge can just forget about me convicting.
I wasn't justifying it...just stating how it is.There are very few conditions which justify assaulting someone. Self defense would be at the top of the list, a few others might fly in a jury trial and result in an acquittal--assaulting someone who sexually molested your child, for example. There is no justification for assaulting someone who "tricked" you into thinking they were a woman or man. There may be grounds to sue them though.
I wasn't justifying it...just stating how it is.
Not telling has lead to some very serious assaults and even murders. If they feel the person won't accept them the best course of action is for them to not involve themselves with the individual. Failing to inform and then tricking the guy into sex is a great way to get seriously hurt.