Idiotic Environmental Predictions

[flogger]

Typical. You didn't read a single page.

Each of the pages in the final, that isn't really the final says its subject to editing. The SPM is the only section actually finalized, so they must make the science match the agenda.

Why waste the keystrokes on someone who is only here to be an irritant ? You'll find that the 'ignore' button is more useful with this guy.

 

[longview]

Why waste the keystrokes on someone who is only here to be an irritant ? You'll find that the 'ignore' button is more useful with this guy.

I still not convinced he is not a Turing test!

 

[watsup]

Why waste the keystrokes on someone who is only here to be an irritant ? You'll find that the 'ignore' button is more useful with this guy.

Psychological projection BIGTIME.

 

[Sandokan]

Just A Coincidence

Just A Coincidence | Real Climate Science

Posted on July 28, 2021 by tonyheller




Study: What Stopping Global Warming Would Require of Americans – IER

My first wife grew up in the Soviet Union in a 600 foot apartment and her family did almost all of their transit by bus. It is just a coincidence that climate alarmists want those same restrictions imposed on everybody else (excluding themselves, of course.)
Click link above for full article.

This what the power hungry Progressive/Regressive of the green new deal have in storage for the rest of us. Under the disguise of global warming they are bringing back the communism system. They will used every trick in the book to accomplished there goal

 

[longview]

This what the power hungry Progressive/Regressive of the green new deal have in storage for the rest of us. Under the disguise of global warming they are bringing back the communism system. They will used every trick in the book to accomplished there goal

I have a very different view of the future!
Fairly soon, oil will increase to about $90 a barrel, at which point the higher profits for a refinery,
will come from harvesting CO2, combining the carbon form CO2 and hydrogen from water and carbon free electricity
to make carbon neutral fuels, which could sell for less at the pump than fuels made from oil.
It breaks the chain that ties fuel production to locations with oil, as any place with a supply of energy can make fuel.
Solar, nuclear and wind, can store surplus energy as hydrocarbon fuels for transport in existing vehicles, jets, and ships,
as well as peaking power plants to cover the alternate sources duty cycle issues.
Because surplus power will have a value, solar homeowners may choose to exchange their surplus for fuel credits rather than electricity credits.
Homeowners will build out more solar to increase the energy credit.
The biggest impact will be in the third world, remote farms could make fuel for tractors, and vastly increase food production, and general lifestyle.
In short a sustainable energy path forward for everyone alive.

 

[watsup]

This what the power hungry Progressive/Regressive of the green new deal have in storage for the rest of us. Under the disguise of global warming they are bringing back the communism system. They will used every trick in the book to accomplished there goal

Conspiracy theory.

 

[Sandokan]

Climate Math At The Economist

Climate Math At The Economist | Real Climate Science

Posted on September 16, 2021 by tonyheller

Climate Math At The Economist (Agnes Version)

Video: (105) Climate Math At The Economist (Agnes Version) - YouTube

The Economist: “were almost no losses from natural disasters in 1974”. That year, “Australia experienced its worst bushfire season in 30 years. About 15 per cent of Australia’s physical land mass sustained extensive fire damage.” That year Darwin was destroyed by Cyclone Tracy. Northeast Australia turned into an inland sea due to record rainfall and flooding. The US had its worst tornado outbreak on record. The National Academy of Science blamed the draught on global cooling. Time magazine, June 24, 1974: “Since the 1940s the mean global temperature has dropped about 2.7° F…Scientists have found other indications of global cooling… Man, too, may be somewhat responsible for the cooling trend.” By the way, in 1972 hurricane Edna in the U.S., caused an estimate of $2.1 billion in damages. Taking inflation into consideration, the $2.1 billion lost in 1972 would be $10.7 billion in 2018. Thanks for the reality check Tony.

These people are shameless, they lied through their teeth. Most of what The Economist publish now a day is political propaganda under the disguise of science.

 

[watsup]

The Economist: “were almost no losses from natural disasters in 1974”. That year, “Australia experienced its worst bushfire season in 30 years. About 15 per cent of Australia’s physical land mass sustained extensive fire damage.” That year Darwin was destroyed by Cyclone Tracy. Northeast Australia turned into an inland sea due to record rainfall and flooding. The US had its worst tornado outbreak on record. The National Academy of Science blamed the draught on global cooling. Time magazine, June 24, 1974: “Since the 1940s the mean global temperature has dropped about 2.7° F…Scientists have found other indications of global cooling… Man, too, may be somewhat responsible for the cooling trend.” By the way, in 1972 hurricane Edna in the U.S., caused an estimate of $2.1 billion in damages. Taking inflation into consideration, the $2.1 billion lost in 1972 would be $10.7 billion in 2018. Thanks for the reality check Tony.

These people are shameless, they lied through their teeth. Most of what The Economist publish now a day is political propaganda under the disguise of science.

What a mishmash of gibberish.

 

[Sandokan]

A New Climate Prophet | Real Climate Science

Posted on September 21, 2021 by tonyheller

Great video by Tony Heller. These prophets of doom used of words like could, might and potential, means that they are speculating over worst case scenario. In other words, their speculation is pure fiction. By the way, the cyclone picture used on the article is from cyclone Yasi, of the coast of Australia in the southern hemisphere where they rotate clockwise. In the northern hemisphere, where Europe is located, they rotate counterclockwise. A new climate prophet of doom has joined the crowd.

 

[Lord of Planar]

Great video by Tony Heller. These prophets of doom used of words like could, might and potential, means that they are speculating over worst case scenario. In other words, their speculation is pure fiction. By the way, the cyclone picture used on the article is from cyclone Yasi, of the coast of Australia in the southern hemisphere where they rotate clockwise. In the northern hemisphere, where Europe is located, they rotate counterclockwise. A new climate prophet of doom has joined the crowd.

When the prophets of doom are too stupid to at least flip the image so it turns the right way, we know they don't have a clue of what they speak of.

Imagine, all the people here in these forums, stupid enough to follow the morons.

 

[Threegoofs]

When the prophets of doom are too stupid to at least flip the image so it turns the right way, we know they don't have a clue of what they speak of.

Imagine, all the people here in these forums, stupid enough to follow the morons.

Tony Heller, of course, is a well known moron.

Steven Goddard

Steven Goddard (Tony Heller) Credentials Masters in Electrical Engineering – Rice University. [1], [2] BS Geology – ASU. [1], [2] Background Steven Goddard is a climate science denier, regular contributor to WattsUpWithThat (WUWT), and operator of ”The Deplorable Climate Science Blog.” The name...

www.desmog.com

It’s exactly the kind of ‘scientist’ confused deniers look up to and rely on for ‘truth’. Embarassing.

 

[Lord of Planar]

Tony Heller, of course, is a well known moron.

Steven Goddard

Steven Goddard (Tony Heller) Credentials Masters in Electrical Engineering – Rice University. [1], [2] BS Geology – ASU. [1], [2] Background Steven Goddard is a climate science denier, regular contributor to WattsUpWithThat (WUWT), and operator of ”The Deplorable Climate Science Blog.” The name...

www.desmog.com

It’s exactly the kind of ‘scientist’ confused deniers look up to and rely on for ‘truth’. Embarassing.

Who cares about what you believe.

Prove it!

 

[Threegoofs]

Who cares about what you believe.

Prove it!

Prove it? Thats kind of the concept of backing my statement up with a reference, which has many examples of his moron qualification.

 

[Lord of Planar]

Prove it? Thats kind of the concept of backing my statement up with a reference, which has many examples of his moron qualification.

Yes, I've seen the lies you believe.

Care to show us a credible one?

 

[watsup]

When the prophets of doom are too stupid to at least flip the image so it turns the right way, we know they don't have a clue of what they speak of.

Imagine, all the people here in these forums, stupid enough to follow the morons.

Psychological projection.

 

[Buzz]

Great video by Tony Heller. These prophets of doom used of words like could, might and potential, means that they are speculating over worst case scenario. In other words, their speculation is pure fiction. By the way, the cyclone picture used on the article is from cyclone Yasi, of the coast of Australia in the southern hemisphere where they rotate clockwise. In the northern hemisphere, where Europe is located, they rotate counterclockwise. A new climate prophet of doom has joined the crowd.

Oh Boy!! It's another completely idiotic video from that friggin moron Tony Heller.

So.... he starts out with what looks like a tweet about a climate scientist with just one quote from her. And then to refute what she says he gives a graphic of sea surface temps from just one day. And anyone who knows anything about science knows that one day temps don't prove or disprove anything. Then he shows a plot of cyclone tracks from the past that in no way proves the scientist's predictions wrong. And then makes a big deal about some past winter storms that also don't prove or disprove anything. Hell... he doesn't make a single real argument that actually comes close to refuting what the scientist is predicting.

Then he goes on to attack James Hansen using a few instances where he made some predictions that didn't turn out to be true. Never mind that Hansen for the most part has been correct far more than he was wrong.

Then there is the article about beaches on the east coast disappearing. Doesn't Tony know that many beaches on the east coast have to regularly truck in fresh sand to maintain them and that if they didn't many would be gone by now? Heller is just willfully ignorant.

Tony goes on to make a few more idiotic statements like when he makes the point that we are not seeing 220 MPH hurricanes when the article he was referring to was predicting hurricanes by the middle of the next century.

And then his last point is truly dumb. He goes back to the tweet he started with and pointed out the link to more information. And instead of actually informing himself he makes a big deal about where the cyclone is in the picture suggesting the scientist "didn't notice" something. But since Tony Heller doesn't actually care about whether or not the stuff he says is true or not, he didn't even go and read the article where the tweet came from. If he had he would have found out that the article was NOT written by the scientist. And that it was actually written by a college student using free stock pictures of a cyclone. Oh... and it also turns out that the scientist quoted uses models to study extreme weather in the southern hemisphere.

https://www.euronews.com/green/

Imagine, all the people here in these forums, stupid enough to follow this moron.

 

[watsup]

Oh Boy!! It's another completely idiotic video from that friggin moron Tony Heller.

So.... he starts out with what looks like a tweet about a climate scientist with just one quote from her. And then to refute what she says he gives a graphic of sea surface temps from just one day. And anyone who knows anything about science knows that one day temps don't prove or disprove anything. Then he shows a plot of cyclone tracks from the past that in no way proves the scientist's predictions wrong. And then makes a big deal about some past winter storms that also don't prove or disprove anything. Hell... he doesn't make a single real argument that actually comes close to refuting what the scientist is predicting.

Then he goes on to attack James Hansen using a few instances where he made some predictions that didn't turn out to be true. Never mind that Hansen for the most part has been correct far more than he was wrong.

Then there is the article about beaches on the east coast disappearing. Doesn't Tony know that many beaches on the east coast have to regularly truck in fresh sand to maintain them and that if they didn't many would be gone by now? Heller is just willfully ignorant.

Tony goes on to make a few more idiotic statements like when he makes the point that we are not seeing 220 MPH hurricanes when the article he was referring to was predicting hurricanes by the middle of the next century.

And then his last point is truly dumb. He goes back to the tweet he started with and pointed out the link to more information. And instead of actually informing himself he makes a big deal about where the cyclone is in the picture suggesting the scientist "didn't notice" something. But since Tony Heller doesn't actually care about whether or not the stuff he says is true or not, he didn't even go and read the article where the tweet came from. If he had he would have found out that the article was NOT written by the scientist. And that it was actually written by a college student using free stock pictures of a cyclone. Oh... and it also turns out that the scientist quoted uses models to study extreme weather in the southern hemisphere.

https://www.euronews.com/green/

Imagine, all the people here in these forums, stupid enough to follow this moron.

That’s some superb checking and analysis of an obvious fraud.

 

[Buzz]

That’s some superb checking and analysis of an obvious fraud.

Thanks. And that isn't the first time I have personally debunked Tony Heller's BS.

 

[Threegoofs]

Oh Boy!! It's another completely idiotic video from that friggin moron Tony Heller.

So.... he starts out with what looks like a tweet about a climate scientist with just one quote from her. And then to refute what she says he gives a graphic of sea surface temps from just one day. And anyone who knows anything about science knows that one day temps don't prove or disprove anything. Then he shows a plot of cyclone tracks from the past that in no way proves the scientist's predictions wrong. And then makes a big deal about some past winter storms that also don't prove or disprove anything. Hell... he doesn't make a single real argument that actually comes close to refuting what the scientist is predicting.

Then he goes on to attack James Hansen using a few instances where he made some predictions that didn't turn out to be true. Never mind that Hansen for the most part has been correct far more than he was wrong.

Then there is the article about beaches on the east coast disappearing. Doesn't Tony know that many beaches on the east coast have to regularly truck in fresh sand to maintain them and that if they didn't many would be gone by now? Heller is just willfully ignorant.

Tony goes on to make a few more idiotic statements like when he makes the point that we are not seeing 220 MPH hurricanes when the article he was referring to was predicting hurricanes by the middle of the next century.

And then his last point is truly dumb. He goes back to the tweet he started with and pointed out the link to more information. And instead of actually informing himself he makes a big deal about where the cyclone is in the picture suggesting the scientist "didn't notice" something. But since Tony Heller doesn't actually care about whether or not the stuff he says is true or not, he didn't even go and read the article where the tweet came from. If he had he would have found out that the article was NOT written by the scientist. And that it was actually written by a college student using free stock pictures of a cyclone. Oh... and it also turns out that the scientist quoted uses models to study extreme weather in the southern hemisphere.

https://www.euronews.com/green/

Imagine, all the people here in these forums, stupid enough to follow this moron.

Your last sentence should cause some people around here to sit up and think about themselves.

But it wont.

 

[Sandokan]

UN Grants Earth A Reprieve | Real Climate Science

Posted on October 26, 2021 by tonyheller

Another excellent video by Tony Heller about global warming. Heller says: “In 1989, the United Nations said we only had until the year 2000 to stop global warming. But now they have granted the planet an additional fifty years.” He is great at providing real facts. I am very happy that the world has until 2052 to stop global warming again, since the previous stops on 2000 and 2016 did not materialized, and the 2030 “the end is near” has been canceled by the new UN forecast. No problem, the climate alarmist will keep resetting the year that the world has to stop global warming.

 

[flogger]

Climate change is not an economic question. It's physics.

Prove it using empirically established data ? Heads up climate models arent it

 

[flogger]

Another excellent video by Tony Heller about global warming. Heller says: “In 1989, the United Nations said we only had until the year 2000 to stop global warming. But now they have granted the planet an additional fifty years.” He is great at providing real facts. I am very happy that the world has until 2052 to stop global warming again, since the previous stops on 2000 and 2016 did not materialized, and the 2030 “the end is near” has been canceled by the new UN forecast. No problem, the climate alarmist will keep resetting the year that the world has to stop global warming.

Funding for this scam has reached $2.3 Trillion annually to date and that will only increase as governments find new ways to tax the air we breath via their well funded pseudoscientific entities like the IPCC

Prepare to get poorer as this juggernaut is now unstoppable especially here in the UK where our nominally Conservative government has bought into this eco anarchism big time.

 

[Deuce]

Prove it using empirically established data ? Heads up climate models arent it

You quoted a post from two years ago to try an argue... what, that climate change is actually a result of communism? Ok dude see you in 2023.

 

[flogger]

You quoted a post from two years ago to try an argue... what, that climate change is actually a result of communism? Ok dude see you in 2023.

So that will be a no then ?

Green Marxism is real and has been for the last 30 years. When the wall fell they simply swapped their red flag for a green one but the agenda is still identical. Bring down the west at any cost

 

[Buzz]

Another excellent video by Tony Heller about global warming. Heller says: “In 1989, the United Nations said we only had until the year 2000 to stop global warming. But now they have granted the planet an additional fifty years.” He is great at providing real facts. I am very happy that the world has until 2052 to stop global warming again, since the previous stops on 2000 and 2016 did not materialized, and the 2030 “the end is near” has been canceled by the new UN forecast. No problem, the climate alarmist will keep resetting the year that the world has to stop global warming.

And yet another video full of lies and misinformation from the denialist hack Tony Heller. I especially love it when he lies about the UN giving the Earth another 50 years. The UN wasn't talking about how many years the Earth has before AGW can't be stopped. It is too late for that. The Earth is going to continue warming no matter what we do. The 50 years is a goal for stopping CO2 emissions to hopefully keep warming from being much worse than what the planet is likely to see already.