• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

ICE raids across L.A. spark backlash; Trump officials vow to continue operations

Taylor said:
Nobody cares. It was a contrived charge built on a specious legal framework. The court system in New York has become a joke.
Click to expand...

I'm curious as to how you gained your expertise on the New York court system. Are you a practicing NY attorney or something?
 
anatta said:
probably funded thru NGOs like USAID grants
Click to expand...
More than likely.
It does seem to be the case that USAID was the Dem's flush fund to funnel money to their left NGOs run by their leftist buddies for leftist causes in support of their ideological war on societies.

The above would also be why the Dems, Libs and progs squealed like stuck pigs when USAID was cleaned up - it was their gravy train.
 
Taylor said:
Nobody cares. It was a contrived charge built on a specious legal framework. The court system in New York has become a joke.
Click to expand...

I know you guys don't care that Trump is a piece of shit, and a convicted felon, a lawless, authoritarian thug who doesn't care about the rule of law, but the rest of us care.
 
MTAtech said:
I’m not suggesting Taco lacked the legal authority to pardon 1,500 convicted criminals who attacked law enforcement officers. I’m saying he’s a hypocrite. In addition, while he has the authority to pardon he lacks the moral authority.
Click to expand...

Indeed, no getting around the blatant hypocrisy from all corners of the magasphere but especially from dear leader himself, the man who’s supposed to be held to the highest standard. It’s only excused deflected away as always.

Not only did he pardon them he said they didn’t assault, that the pardons were a great thing for humanity.

Yes, the President of the United States, the man who took an oath, the man who holds the world’s loudest megaphone, the man who’s praised, worshipped and glorified as the savior of law and order, truth, justice and the American way said the thugs on J6 didn’t assault, that they were the ones who were assaulted and pardoning them was a great thing for humanity
 
Last edited:
Napoleon said:
File your grievance with SCOTUS.
Click to expand...

NGOs fund the majority of legal expenses for unaccompanied immigrant minors, so all the Trump supporters who think toddlers separated from their families shouldn't have a paid lawyer can post their grievance on X with their anonymous white supremacist account.
 
W_Heisenberg said:
When I read comments like this, it's made clear to me that when you guys talk about ending illegal immigration, you really mean ending all immigration.
Click to expand...
LOL, there you go, inventing shit again.
The posts I have read up here are always welcoming legal immigration, and condemning illegal immigration.

W_Heisenberg said:
The grant that CHIRLA received was for English and civics classes and to give lawful permanent residents help filing the N-400 naturalization application. These funds were about the U.S. government funding an organization that helped immigrants assimilate by learning English and also provide help on becoming naturalized citizens. The idea that you'd be opposed to this sort of thing exposes your opposition to illegal immigration as being a bad-faith argument. You guys don't care if immigration is legal or not. You want no immigration at all.
Click to expand...
You mean in addition to funding the LA rioters, right?

W_Heisenberg said:
CHIRLA did organize lawful, non-violent protests in reaction to ICE's heavy-handed tactics in Los Angeles,
Click to expand...
Yeah, we see the burning cars, attacking police and ICE with fireworks, cinder blocks and frozen water bottles.

W_Heisenberg said:
but guess what? It's a free country and people are allowed to protest, even people who aren't of 100% European ancestry.
Click to expand...
You keep injecting your racism into what isn't about race, but is about enforcing existing immigration laws.
Well, you do your racist you, I guess.
 
eohrnberger said:
Irks me that public money is used to fund this crap, that which is exactly antithetical to the public's best interests, as expressed by their strong sentiment for these deportations to be implemented.
Click to expand...
Since this group's money helped to fund the LA "protests", wouldn't this qualify them as inciters of the LA riot? Their protesters doxed ICE raid locations. They should be held legally responsible.
 
eohrnberger said:
It's not the amount of money, it's the purpose that money is being used for.

In the case the case of CHIRLA and the over $33 million received from government grants, it is being used to tear down rule of law and the US society, two of Soros' favorite causes.
Click to expand...
Here comes the anti-semitism embedded in the MAGAt movement.
 
eohrnberger said:
LOL, there you go, inventing shit again.
The posts I have read up here are always welcoming legal immigration, and condemning illegal immigration.


You mean in addition to funding the LA rioters, right?


Yeah, we see the burning cars, attacking police and ICE with fireworks, cinder blocks and frozen water bottles.


You keep injecting your racism into what isn't about race, but is about enforcing existing immigration laws.
Well, you do your racist you, I guess.
Click to expand...

I see the old anti-immigration card is in play. Don't they know their woke tricks expired when the people elected DJT?
 
uptower said:
We're not just talking about a politician exploiting an existing crisis for political gain. That's pretty weak sauce compared to a president who manufactures and exacerbates crises as an excuse to expand authoritarian powers.
Click to expand...
This is the best explanation so far;



2. Donald Trump, unlike most politicians, actively seeks to fulfill his campaign promises.

3. Democrats see mass illegal immigration as their only achievable path to long-term political viability (with amnesty being inevitable, thus creating a new mass of dependent Democrat voters).

4. To survive, Democrats must find some way to stand public opinion on its head and end the push to deport their prospective illegal alien constituents.

5. In 2020, carefully planned, orchestrated and executed nation-wide riots were successful in defeating Donald Trump as Joe Biden represented a “return to normalcy.” Democrat leaders at all levels planned, participated in and fomented these riots for their own political gain. It worked.

6. Today, in 2025, Democrats see the antipathy of the average voter to illegal immigration as the biggest threat to their party’s survival. They are desperate to turn the tide of public opinion, and the only viable path they see to doing this is a repeat of the 2020 Saint George Floyd riots.

7. Thus, Democrat leaders at all levels are currently planning, orchestrating, funding and fomenting riots in Los Angeles (and ultimately elsewhere) while purposely ensuring law enforcement response is inadequate, all in an effort to break public opinion and save their party.

8. Given the above, President Trump sending in the National Guard against the will of the Democrat leaders actually benefits the Democrats.

9. However, the Democrats do not realize it’s not 2020 anymore and America is on to their game of violence and destruction.

10. Ultimately, We the People win.
 
W_Heisenberg said:
NGOs fund the majority of legal expenses for unaccompanied immigrant minors, so all the Trump supporters who think toddlers separated from their families shouldn't have a paid lawyer can post their grievance on X with their anonymous white supremacist account.
Click to expand...
Speaking from experience are you?
 
j brown's body said:
McCarthy never exposed one communist in government. But ruined the careers of a lot of decent people.
Click to expand...
Ahh, lying - last refuge of the failed National Socialist Democrat party.

How about Whittaker Chambers? Go ahead and lie, but Chambers acknowledged that he was a Communist and supported the USSR.

But of course it's FAR more than Chambers, Alger Hiss and a whole host of others. The undoing of your lie is that the Soviet Union fell. It was an event that not only devastated the democrats, but also exposed just how deeply entwined the Democrats were with the USSR. The Venona transcripts detailed it all - once the wall fell and historians gained access.

 
j brown's body said:
lol, you like the idea of 4 year olds representing themselves in court. What a defender of justice you are! :D
Click to expand...

No 4 year old has ever been deported.

The National Socialist democrats seek to separate 4 year olds who are anchor babies from illegal alien parents to create a crisis. democrat seditionists think they can cripple the judicial system and thus thwart enforcement of immigration law in this way. In fact, when a minor is involved, the parents have an option of leaving the child with a qualified relative if one is available, or taking the child with them.
 
venice_ca said:
1992 was a general uprising — and not even that chaos and destruction was called an insurrection.
Click to expand...

CHAZ/CHOP was an outright insurrection, in fact treason per the Constitution, waging war against the United States.

But it is you of the National Socialist democrats who decided that protests and riots are insurrection. In order to smear and slander the enemies of the party, it became standard to lie that the J6 Reichstag Fire was an insurrection.

Obviously the uprising by foreign nationals in Los Angeles fits the description of insurrection far better.

venice_ca said:
Even after the Rodney King beating, no reforms were imposed on the LAPD until the scandal in their Ramparts Division made police corruption too flagrant to ignore — officers selling confiscated drugs was even too much for the most ardent supporters of the force.
Click to expand...

That's a blatant lie. Massive changes were made.

venice_ca said:
The Ramparts Division covered the area where many recent Central American refugees had settled in Los Angeles. So police preying on that community — false accusations of gang involvement, brutality, planting drug evidence — is exactly the type of conditions that CHIRLA was fighting against to defend the Central American community.
Click to expand...

LOL

False huh?

The issue with Rampart is that they were in bed with the gangs - corrupt up to the rafters. The gangs had bought an paid for them.

John and Ken on KFI had the best coverage, but here is a Communist source so you can't complain of bias.

 
Bodecea said:
12 members of a jury who heard all the evidence disagree with you. They weren't groomed like you were.
Click to expand...
They didn't hear "the evidence" they heard a bunch of contrived nonsense.
 
trump-and-la-protesters.png
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom