• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

ICE raids across L.A. spark backlash; Trump officials vow to continue operations

Flip parties.
Suppose it was a previous Democrat president in that court with those charges. Would you still feel the same and hold the same position?
I rather doubt it.

Yes, we would still feel the same and hold the same position. Dems were actually embarrassed by Bob Menendez and couldn't wait until he was gone. He was a POS.

And Menendez looks like a choir boy next to trump.
 
That it was politically motivated taints the entire proceedings, the judge, the decision, and especially the prosecutor and prosecution which bought this politically motivated case.

I would think that you'd object as much as I am when politicians use the courts and the legal system for their political purposes.
Your post quoted above appears that you aren't concerned about it, and this lack of concern has me concerned.

Flip parties.
Suppose it was a previous Democrat president in that court with those charges. Would you still feel the same and hold the same position?
I rather doubt it.
Nothing is tainted. The evidence proved his guilt. As far as switching parties, that means nothing to me. I'm neither Republican nor Democrat. Switch the parties and I feel thd same if the evidence proves guilt. Charge Biden. That would be political. If the evidence proves he's guilty, I want him charged. No one should be above the law.
 
See my response on that in previous post. Appears that there may be some confusion as to which day Pence was in Congress at 3:40 AM.
Honestly, I don't see how you could be confused.

eohrnberger: "Yes, yes, this is the politically motivated push narrative from the left, yet within a mere few hours that electoral count was held."

JohnfrmClevelan: "Yeah, at, like, 3:33 AM. Secret Service wanted to take Pence off campus, but he refused. Nothing to see here, just some rowdy tourists."​

YOU pointed out the electoral count was delayed a few hours. John pointed out it was more than a few hours. Can you explain how you thought time went backwards 24 hours, leading to your confusion?
 
Yes, we would still feel the same and hold the same position. Dems were actually embarrassed by Bob Menendez and couldn't wait until he was gone. He was a POS.
Yes, yes. I'm aware of Menendez and his corruption. Funny thing is, there's not nearly the front page coverage and constant fauxraging had it been a non-Dem.

And Menendez looks like a choir boy next to trump.
LOL. Yeah, yeah, sure sure. </sarcasm>
This is the opinion you've been told to parrot by the Dems' compliant and complicit propagandists in the MSM, and your liberal / progressive media echo chamber.
 
You just doubted it a few posts ago.

Again, you disputed this fact just a few posts back. How is it relevant? To those of us who have been debating you, it's yet another example of a trumpie not accepting even the most mundane bit of truth without a struggle.
I misunderstood which specific day / date you were talking about.
My mistake was thinking that was 3:40 AM the day of the Electorate College Vote Certification in the House, before the riot, not the dark AM morning after the riot.

Yeah, I don't think that's the problem here. I think the problem here is that you can't just admit when you are wrong.
Just did above. Wrong again. Oh well.

You describe EVERYTHING as subjective opinion. To you, water being wet is a subjective opinion.
Sorry, but this is not even remotely accurate.
 
Honestly, I don't see how you could be confused.

eohrnberger: "Yes, yes, this is the politically motivated push narrative from the left, yet within a mere few hours that electoral count was held."​
JohnfrmClevelan: "Yeah, at, like, 3:33 AM. Secret Service wanted to take Pence off campus, but he refused. Nothing to see here, just some rowdy tourists."​

YOU pointed out the electoral count was delayed a few hours. John pointed out it was more than a few hours.
So there's a difference of opinion on how many hours is 'a few'. 🤷‍♂️

Can you explain how you thought time went backwards 24 hours, leading to your confusion?
 
Nothing is tainted.
I understand you politically motivated need for not acknowledging the various points about that case which I've already posted.
There's no point in discussing this any further with you.

The evidence proved his guilt. As far as switching parties, that means nothing to me. I'm neither Republican nor Democrat. Switch the parties and I feel thd same if the evidence proves guilt. Charge Biden. That would be political. If the evidence proves he's guilty, I want him charged. No one should be above the law.
 
Yes, yes. I'm aware of Menendez and his corruption. Funny thing is, there's not nearly the front page coverage and constant fauxraging had it been a non-Dem.

Your boy trump demands the headlines. He feeds on the attention. Also, he is far and away the most corrupt POTUS in U.S. history.

LOL. Yeah, yeah, sure sure. </sarcasm>
This is the opinion you've been told to parrot by the Dems' compliant and complicit propagandists in the MSM, and your liberal / progressive media echo chamber.

No, I'm just going by the sheer number of indictments for serious crimes. (Plus the 34 convictions.)
 
Your boy trump demands the headlines. He feeds on the attention.
More like the MSM is feeding off of their ginned up hoaxes an fauxrage those instigate.

Also, he is far and away the most corrupt POTUS in U.S. history.
So you've been told to believe.

Were he as corrupt as you've been told to believe, he wouldn't have won the presidency.

No wonder you, and others on the left, are so angry all the time.

Whether you realize it, or more likely not, you are angry because of the hoaxes which you've been told to believe, and those hoaxes didn't matter in the election because those hoaxes didn't work as was expected.

Yeah, no wonder you, and others on the left, are so angry all the time.

No, I'm just going by the sheer number of indictments for serious crimes. (Plus the 34 convictions.)
We've already covered this ground. If you don't recall, scroll backwards through the thread.
 
Back
Top Bottom