- Joined
- Mar 9, 2017
- Messages
- 27,221
- Reaction score
- 19,605
- Location
- Ontario, Canada
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Progressive
I'm simply referring to how tyrants function with regard to us not knowing why she was deported. I understand that it is done in our name.
Yes, it is unbelievable isn't it. Wonder if there is more to the story? Of course I've seen TSA agents act like real asses a few times and I know customs folks are pretty no nonsense. so we will have to wait to see what else comes out.Australian woman says she was deported after visiting US army husband at Hawaii base
Nicolle Saroukos, 25, of Sydney, says she was held in federal prison overnight before she was deportedwww.independent.co.uk
Unbelievable.
You still don't know what ICE does.These ICE guys
You still don't know what ICE does.
We can read the source article and come to a few more likely conclusions that aren't quite so melodramatic. She says this was to be her third visit since getting married in December. If we do some basic math, we can see that that's right around six months. Because she's Australian, she's probably entering under the Visa Waiver Program, allowing a maximum stay of 90 days. Stay for 90 days twice, and that's six months. Stay for six months and it starts to look an awful lot like you don't have a job or fixed permanent residence in your home country. The more time you spend in the US, the less likely you are to have ties to compel your return. She has a husband in the US, and (quite possibly) has spent most of the last six months here. She has quite a bit of motive to stay and little demanding her presence in Australia (if she had long stays). And who knows what they found in her phone? Evidence of intent to seek employment? I just have no reason to believe this woman was picked at random and excuses were made up to refuse her admission.From the article, it appears that the agents dealing with her felt as if she had too many clothes in her suitcase for a three week visit, and that she was going to overstay her visa.
I don't know that she did, but it doesn't matter. Whether entering with a visa or on the Visa Waiver Program, you are not guaranteed admission to the United States.So, no, based on that, she was not entering illegally, she had a visa.
People entering my country have to prove to the satisfaction of the inspecting officer that they are not an intending immigrant. I have significant doubt regarding the veracity of the details of this story, especially since all we hear is her side of it.Do you think people entering your country legally should be treated this way?
Pretending it's all lies is pretty much all you have left at this point. But that's always been the escape for Trump supporters. Everyone else is lying except the felon rapist conman.you are probably right
People entering my country have to prove to the satisfaction of the inspecting officer that they are not an intending immigrant. I have significant doubt regarding the veracity of the details of this story, especially since all we hear is her side of it.
cancelOK, despite being shocked at both of your responses, I'll shelf this for now, we'll talk again when more details are available.
Unlikely. The whole point is that details will never be made available. The woman will not be given a reason why she was deported, and MAGA like @Bullseye and @Grizzly Adams aren't particularly curious about it--and even if they were, their role is not to question Donald but to simply accept his edicts so he's certainly not going to read the likes of them into his thought process and they certainly aren't going to ask questions that could be perceived as evidence of disloyalty. They're just foot soldiers, after all. Besides, her skin was somewhat darker and she had tattoos so it's not like they want the likes of her anywhere near them anyway.OK, despite being shocked at both of your responses, I'll shelf this for now, we'll talk again when more details are available.
yesDid she have a passport?
Ok-- but was she entering the country lawfully?
That wasn't part of the story.
Is this really neccesary? It's a sick, ****ing show put on by our sadistic commander in chief. Anyone doing this work should feel degraded.
"The officer checking passports “went from completely composed to just yelling at the top of his lungs, telling my mother to go stand at the back of the line and to excuse my language, ‘shut up’,” Saroukos recalled."
...She was then put through a body cavity search before being paraded through the airport in handcuffs and taken to the federal detention center.
“They stated, ‘No, you’re not under arrest. You haven’t done anything wrong, and you’ll be facing no criminal charges.’ So I was very confused as to why this was all happening,” she said."
his regime is literally letting in Sinaloa Cartel members on purpose
Unlikely. The whole point is that details will never be made available. The woman will not be given a reason why she was deported, and MAGA like @Bullseye and @Grizzly Adams aren't particularly curious about it--and even if they were, their role is not to question Donald but to simply accept his edicts so he's certainly not going to read the likes of them into his thought process and they certainly aren't going to ask questions that could be perceived as evidence of disloyalty. They're just foot soldiers, after all. Besides, her skin was somewhat darker and she had tattoos so it's not like they want the likes of her anywhere near them anyway.
So, I doubt there will be more talking again on this subject.
Ok-- but was she entering the country lawfully?
That wasn't part of the story.
Whelp Donald is begging for a revolution.Sorry, this is absolutely believable.
This is what you guys are until you're not.
America is quickly becoming a no go zone. And I'm not shocked anymore.
Whelp Donald is begging for a revolution.
Ready and waiting though im not so smug to think i am going to be the vanguard, dont have the ability.You guys ought to give him one.
I see what you are trying to imply.you are probably right
Lets not go there.You guys ought to give him one.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?