• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

I Think I'm Done With The Hill Rising

Oh please. Stalin murdered literally 1000x more leftists than Mussolini did. Does that make Stalin "right wing"?

That's not really hard to do considering just 26 people were executed by the Italian government under Mussolini.

Killing people of a specific ideology doesn't equal an automatic definition of ideological absolution. Stalin was a left winger despite his often conservative social views.
 
Is Milton Friedman on the left?






I agree, they often don't.



To make the case, you should provide some examples.

Department of Homeland Security
Patriot Act

"Liberalism is a political and moral philosophy based on liberty, consent of the governed and equality before the law. Liberals espouse a wide array of views depending on their understanding of these principles, but they generally support free markets, free trade, limited government, individual rights (including civil rights and human rights), capitalism, democracy, secularism, gender equality, racial equality, internationalism, freedom of speech, freedom of the press and freedom of religion."

 
Lol yes, it absolutely was. The Italian fascists attempted to exterminate every leftist they could catch. The same goes for the Nazis, who did so with the enthusiastic support of the Junker thugs.
No. They did not. In either case.
 
italian fascism was not right wing.

I hate this thread. Everyone is engaging in ridiculous oversimplification in order to promote their own political agenda.

The reality of fascism was more complex.

For instance:

Italian Fascists in 1920​

In 1920, militant strike activity by industrial workers reached its peak in Italy and 1919 and 1920 were known as the "Red Years".[134] Mussolini and the Fascists took advantage of the situation by allying with industrial businesses and attacking workers and peasants in the name of preserving order and internal peace in Italy.[135]

Fascists identified their primary opponents as the majority of socialists on the left who had opposed intervention in World War I.[133] The Fascists and the Italian political right held common ground: both held Marxism in contempt, discounted class consciousness and believed in the rule of elites.[136] The Fascists assisted the anti-socialist campaign by allying with the other parties and the conservative right in a mutual effort to destroy the Italian Socialist Party and labour organizations committed to class identity above national identity.[136]

Fascism sought to accommodate Italian conservatives by making major alterations to its political agenda—abandoning its previous populism, republicanism and anticlericalism, adopting policies in support of free enterprise and accepting the Catholic Church and the monarchy as institutions in Italy.[137] To appeal to Italian conservatives, Fascism adopted policies such as promoting family values, including policies designed to reduce the number of women in the workforce—limiting the woman's role to that of a mother. The fascists banned literature on birth control and increased penalties for abortion in 1926, declaring both crimes against the state.[138]

Though Fascism adopted a number of anti-modern positions designed to appeal to people upset with the new trends in sexuality and women's rights—especially those with a reactionary point of view—the Fascists sought to maintain Fascism's revolutionary character, with Angelo Oliviero Olivetti saying: "Fascism would like to be conservative, but it will [be] by being revolutionary".[139] The Fascists supported revolutionary action and committed to secure law and order to appeal to both conservatives and syndicalists.[140]

Prior to Fascism's accommodations to the political right, Fascism was a small, urban, northern Italian movement that had about a thousand members.[141] After Fascism's accommodation of the political right, the Fascist movement's membership soared to approximately 250,000 by 1921.[142]

 
No. They did not. In either case.

Another day, another round of EMN being wrong about history. How shocking....not🙄

The Blackshirts were fought by left wing groups from the get go— a prime example being in august of 1922, when a coalition of three hundred or so socialists and other leftists prevented twenty thousand fascist thugs from seizing Parma.


Mussolini’s death squads were hunting the left, while the full support of fellow far right thugs, from the very beginning.

As for the “noblemen”......


In Germany especially, they embraced the far right—- as shown by their support of the Nazis.

And that’s not even getting into the bulk of the junkers
 
That's not really hard to do considering just 26 people were executed by the Italian government under Mussolini.

Killing people of a specific ideology doesn't equal an automatic definition of ideological absolution. Stalin was a left winger despite his often conservative social views.

Stalin makes Margaret Thatcher look like a video hoe in terms of social views.

He executed artists, academics, musicians, homosexuals, made moral codes compulsory in schools, terrorized journalists, and used scientists to wipe out unworthy sectors of society.

Sure, he said many times he was an atheist - but then he replaced the church of Jesus, synagogues for Jews and mosques for Muslims, with the altar to the communist ego.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom