Onion Eater
Well-known member
- Joined
- Jun 28, 2008
- Messages
- 753
- Reaction score
- 139
- Location
- Scottsdale, AZ
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Libertarian
Problem > solution. The Russians simply leveled the city.
Indeed. And the Chechens are not the Russians.Russians just kicked ass.
...in a cityIs there suddenly the need to fight the Russians?
...in a city
When you're caught in some city somewhere with a sniper rifle and the Russians are invading you'll wish that you'd paid better attention.
Seriously man.
Seriously.
...in a city
When you're caught in some city somewhere with a sniper rifle and the Russians are invading you'll wish that you'd paid better attention.
Seriously man.
Seriously.
Seriously... your advice would be of no use. I payed attention to my all arms instructors. Are you a fantasist?
Paul
Indeed. And the Chechens are not the Russians.
The Russians basically leveled Grozny. Infantry patroled the ruins in tandem with tanks. Anyone remaining in the city was considered a hostile and dealt with severely. The Russians also employed Kontrakniki. These are Russian military vets (mercenaries and all alcoholics) who sign a three year contract. They are outfitted and supplied by the Russian military, yet they answer to no one. They sometimes man checkpoints, but their main forte is sweep and destroy missions. God help you if your bribe stash is deemed insufficient.
Russians....Piss poor discipline, Terrible habits, Drink alot, Tough as nails. The only thing worse then fighting a russian soldier is fighting a native american.
Problem > solution. The Russians simply leveled the city.
Not to belitle the achievment of a guerilla force holding up a military super power on its own doorstep for a decade. Lets not pretend the tactics arent effective.
Russians....Piss poor discipline, Terrible habits, Drink alot, Tough as nails. The only thing worse then fighting a russian soldier is fighting a native american.
Effective, but effective at what? Simply killing Russians? Drawing the conflict out? Getting their city completely razed?
Effective is a relative term.
A tactic can be effective, but that doesn't mean it's actually successful. I'm asking only because I'd like to know if you're just speaking in general or does your argument go deeper in this specific situation?
If you are going to fight Russians in an American city then just spray paint all the freeway signs in your county. They will never get there.
What the hell is that supposed to mean? That sounds like a line out of an old war movie. What are you correlating here?
It means the only two fist fights I've ever lost were a Russian and a Big Native American.
Effective, but effective at what? Simply killing Russians? Drawing the conflict out? Getting their city completely razed?
Effective is a relative term.
A tactic can be effective, but that doesn't mean it's actually successful. I'm asking only because I'd like to know if you're just speaking in general or does your argument go deeper in this specific situation?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?