![]()
RFK Jr., once poisoned by mercury, is silent as EPA weakens rules against it
The HHS secretary has fought mercury pollution for years. He’s now in an administration that wants to make it easier for industries to dump it into the airwww.eenews.net
Canola oil, though, now THAT'S gotta go.
Revelation said:Nola, i think some of the Ignorant responses you are getting could be that many here have a small grasp of Politics, but no grasp of what is good for natural health.
i tend to comment less on politics but more on the religious debates, as i have more experience with that. health care should be of interest to all, but apparently many on the Left who used to be part of the Organic movement back in the day, have been co-opted by industry propaganda.
propaganda works, billions are spent on advertising everything because it does work. but 'truth in advertising' ? not so much.
.
Revelation said:
a benevolent dictatorship is preferable over a democracy or a republic.
however i would prefer a christian theocracy over even that kind of thing.
Well said!
Well said!
“Has there been one single chronic disease medication in modern American history that has lowered rates of the chronic disease?”
“Is it appropriate that the American Academy of Pediatrics right now, which is 90% funded by pharma, is pushing Ozempic on six year olds?”
“The lobbyists in this room do not have the humility to admit that we have gone completely wrong.”
“The lobbyists in this room laughing when we have the sickest children in the developed world.”
I bet you can't say specifically what is supposedly bullshit.This is bullshit on its surface. From someone who is spinning you bullshit.
Calley Means is a businessperson. Not a doctor, not a scientist. Not formally trained in either.
He's in BUSINESS. And only recently in any sort of "business" even associated with "health".
Start with the first sentence you quoted?I bet you can't say specifically what is supposedly bullshit.
A medication designed to treat a chronic disease wouldn't be a medication that would lower the rate of chronic disease.“Has there been one single chronic disease medication in modern American history that has lowered rates of the chronic disease?”
Oh okay. What have they done at all for the chronic disease epidemic? Nothing at all except pad companies profits.Start with the first sentence you quoted?
A medication designed to treat a chronic disease wouldn't be a medication that would lower the rate of chronic disease.
Because simple logic and understanding of two things:
Chronic diseases don't have cures.
Treatments are not the same as preventing something from happening
Who is “they”?Oh okay. What have they done at all for the chronic disease epidemic? Nothing at all except pad companies profits.
The scientists at the agencies that are supposed to be protecting us but weren't.Who is “they”?
Protecting you from what?The scientists at the agencies that are supposed to be protecting us but weren't.
Making sure food and medications are safeProtecting you from what?
It's not a requirement to be a scientist to talk about this subject.And you don’t care about science - the guy you shared the video of isn’t a scientist.
He's making a living. The horror!He makes his money selling books and running a company.
You attack the person and you can't discredit what he's saying because he's right.He’s not “protecting” you either. He’s trying to get more tax dollars for his stuff vs. for actual scientific studies.
Here is me not watching your stupid X spam.
Here is me not watching your stupid X spam.
That bill needs to die. Those Republicans and anyone who voted for this should be ashamed of themselves.